In A Real Pandemic - Katie Jayne

Katie Jayne

In a real pandemic:

The TV doesn’t have to keep reminding you that you’re in one.

They wouldn’t need to coerce you into having a ‘vacc1ne’, everybody would be queueing up.

The media would try to calm the population, not subject us to a relentless fear campaign.

Everybody would know someone who had died from it.

You wouldn’t continue to employ methods of l0ckd0wn and ma5k mandates that have been proven ineffective.

People would be scared to mingle anywhere. Not just in places where rules apply,
to virtual signal their compliance.

They’d be able to provide evidence of isolation of the disease/v1ris. As it is supposedly everywhere?

There wouldn’t be thousands of doctors/scientists/noble prize winners telling us there is no pandemic.

If they weren’t correct there would be no need to censor said doctors/scientists.

They would let them speak and debunk them head on.

There wouldn’t be nurses and doctors working on so called cv wards speaking out against the agenda
(putting their jobs at risk) and quitting their jobs in shame.

There wouldn’t be a patent for said virus (ie rendering it man made) years
in advance of us supposedly knowing of said v1rus.

There wouldn’t be patents for PPE naming said v1rus years in advance of advent of said v1rus.

There wouldn’t be multiple agenda documents, written years in advance,
setting out the occurrence of said virus and how they would use it to
push a NWO.

There wouldn’t be fake footage of people keeling over in the street at the start of this,
never to be seen again in reality.

Those that ignore all rules would be affected, not just those that believe the narrative.

All age and fitness levels would be affected not just the old and/or vulnerable
(in excess of what we would expect for a normal flu).

The vacc1ne wouldn’t have a lower survival rate than the ‘v1rus’ itself.

They would require isolation of said v1rus in order to make a legitimate vacc1ne.

There wouldn’t be a 99.7% survival rate.

It wouldn’t replace annual flu deaths in exactly the same numbers.

It would be measured by death rates only, not the number of so called ‘cases’ (measured by a ‘test’ that isn’t fit for purpose).

Those dying of other causes would not need to be ‘lumped’ together with so called cv deaths

(just because they were ‘tested’ positive within the past 28 days) to exaggerate true figures, to increase fear.

They’d be an excess of deaths compared to an average year.

They’d be no dispute as to whether you’re actually in one.

And the list goes on....

Katie Jayne