Robert F Kennedy Jr Wins A Massive Court Victory That Is Sending 5g Back To The Drawing Board

Discussion in 'OFF TOPIC SUBJECTS' started by CULCULCAN, Aug 25, 2021.

  1. CULCULCAN

    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,226
    Robert F Kennedy Jr Wins A Massive Court Victory

    That Is Sending 5G Back To The Drawing Board

    Kennedy challenged the safety of 5G and took the FCC, FDA, and

    Telecommunications Giants to court

    alleging that there was virtually no studies to determine

    the negative health impacts the increased radiation

    from 5G exposure would have.

    After a lengthy court battle, going all the way up to the Court of Appeals,

    eventually the Judge ruled in Kennedy's favor, agreeing that there was

    so little evidence proving that 5G technology was safe that it can not be used

    until such time that it can be proven to not cause harm.

    Now for 5G to move forward in the United States,

    these companies have to hold public hearings,

    present their safety studies, and allow for their data to be challenged.

    This is huge.

    In essence, Robert Kennedy just drove the nail in the coffin

    for the "Internet of Things".

    The technology was never meant to improve the lives of anyone,

    but rather was a system of totalitarian tracking and control.

    As many speculate that this was the ultimate purpose

    of putting graphene oxide nanoparticles in the jabs,

    those sinister plans, too, have now been torpedoed.

    This is a major victory for humanity, thank you, Robert Kennedy Jr

    video:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/TyHbtr5bBKoz
    [embed]https://www.bitchute.com/video/TyHbtr5bBKoz[/embed]/
     
  2. CULCULCAN

    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,226
    I'm still willing to bet that there was and is a correlation between 5G technology and Covid-19, Covid_19, Covid 19 or cornavirus
    Exposure to high frequencies, like 5G, as, it will reduce oxygen to white blood cells
    and it will greatly diminish the immune system.

    The pilot city for 5G was Wuhan, China in November of 2019.

    This got me thinking, is 5G - THE MASTER KEY
    that can act as THE SWiTCH, and, then the VACCiNE OR VAX engineers could make it do anything they wanted it to do ???

    WOW; if it could do that, it could activate,
    or, it could deactivate absolutely anything and everything that in your DNA :(

    #Yikes, that is one #scary-SCARY thought !!!

    @13LiNESofSPiRiT
    @iN12d
    #thefinalfire #theoriginalspark #the13thbridge
     
  3. CULCULCAN

    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,226
  4. CULCULCAN

    CULCULCAN The Final Synthesis - isbn 978-0-9939480-0-8 Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,226
    FCC-Not-Environmental-Agency.

    5G

    Press Conference: FCC Lawsuit Decision in Favor of Environmental Health Groups and Petitioners


    By B.N. Frank

    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is supposed to protect Americans from the telecom and cable industries. Instead the agency has catered to these industries for decades (see 1, 2). Lawsuits have been filed against it for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of cell phone and WiFi radiation, 5G on Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), in space (see 1, 2) and also for allowing telecom and cable companies to overcharge Americans for decades.

    Earlier this month, a federal court ruled in favor of organizations and petitioners that claim the agency is not adequately protecting the public from harmful wireless exposure.

    Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for posting more details online about this as well as a video with excerpts from its press conference.

    EHT v. FCC Lawsuit | Press Conference Excerpts of Frank Clegg, Former President of Microsoft Canada

    In an historic decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judged in favor of environmental health groups and petitioners on Aug. 13, 2021, finding the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) violated the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to respond to comments on environmental harm. The court ruled that the decision by the FCC to retain its 1996 safety limits for human exposure to wireless radiation was “arbitrary and capricious.” and held that the FCC failed to respond to “record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the Commission’s current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer.”

    Read on:https://www.activistpost.com/2021/0...ROsX-uBmtUqu9rOvXZlSR2HpObrRd6evoYrR6NXzXfZeM
     

Share This Page