The Quantum Big Bang in the Weyl String and Supermembrane EpsEss

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°37

shiloh on Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:45 am

​

Jorgelito - Posted 9 Hours Ago


Re: On the Universal Gematria

Emeth141, what name is given (I have a hunch you know this stuff) to before ENERGY, before ABSTRACTION, before ARCHETYPES, before UNIVERSE?
In my mind it's that empty, open spaces, open channels, wide frequencies prevailing, staring into space, captured in wonder, nothing on my mind and experiencing things themselves. -- feeling and state of mind. I think it's when we're not actively doing anything - not actively feeling, not actively thinking, not actively intending.
Daydreaming, smelling the flowers, being in love, waking up from a good nap and having a cool shower on a hot summer day are close neighbors to this space.
I'm looking for a name that's true, beautiful and down-to-earth, poetic, resonating universally and metaphor at most any level of understanding to that which it is. What it describes is something that's practically nothing but feels like everything.

Similar to virtual particles. They're only around for a very short time; it's like they're nothing at all. If the metaphor is true, then a way to see BEFORE there is light (along with the name) would be by the tracks it leaves.

​

The Cosmogenesis has a clear definition for this Jorgelito. It is a trinity of mathematical expressions of sorts, which can however very easliy become semantisized.
This expression is related to the famous 'creation ex nihilo' of the ancient philosophers, say the greek thinkers. How can something come from nothing?

Well the expression is :

0 - 1 - ∞

Nothingness = Oneness = Eternity

The Eternal Void Exists as Unity as Everything or All That Is!​

Of course there exists quite a bit of mathematical reasoning behind this statement; such as what is this thing called 'Mathematical Infinity' and what is this Number Zero and why can't you divide any finite number by 0, except in some definition of mathematical processing called a LIMIT. The most pertinent consequence embodied by this expression is, that the idea of the eternal or the infinity CANNOT physically exist without its own FINITISATION or Self-Limitation as a Oneness and a Unification, which requires the holographic fractalisation of the Quantum in the microstates of the smallest limits of existence (say a quark-lepton wavicle subatromic structure) and its corollary macrostate of the maximisation of the same (say galactic superclusters).

The following reprint from the Thuban archives can elucidate the above said.

Btw, the 'Virtual Particles' of the status quo physics actually are as nonexistant in the 'void' of the so termed 'Heisenberg Uncertainty Matrix', as their labelling implies. This has to do with the supposed supersymmetry of a Matter-Antimatter Creation event described by the Big Bang Cosmology. There never was such a Matter-Antimatter Equilibrium IN ENERGY, comprised of both radiation and inertia carriers (particles of mass). What took its mathematical-symmetry place was the concept of AntiRadiation-Radiation or the photon-antiphoton or the light-antilight parameters.

Perhaps you can see here, how all of physical science assumes its metaphysical character in the ontological basis for all the sciences and philosophies.
The treatize below, can illuminate the 'truth seekers'.

Emeth141, September 4th, 2013


Der Spiegel des Luzifer's und die Emanzipation der Gesamtheit

Lucifer's Mirror and the Emancipation of the Oneness

This is for English and German Speakers on the forums. An English translation is provided.

SACSAYHUAMAN; CUSCO; PERU = PURE HUMAN OCCUS SAY SAAC= PURE HUMAN OCC US AS [Y=I]SAAC (see below for A...A and decode Isaac's Seed).
Some key decodings, say as 'proposed' by the 'channeled or human mind invented' agenda from the wingmakers 'Ancient Arrow site in New Mexico can now be given and these keys can subsequently be utilized to decode the Armageddon protocols of the hierarchies.

{{{ANIMUS=ANU.MIS=AM.IN.US=MAN.IS.U=A.MINUS=ANU.IS.M=A-=ANUBIS+11=ANUB*IS-5=ANURIS-5=ANUBIS+AA=ANUBIS+101=ANUBIS+5_bin=77=MYST=BESECRET=77, but you can try D.I.Y=38=ALPHA=BRIDE=NOAH
77=74+3=LUCIFER+OMEGA-ALPHA=KINGLUCIFER-BRIDE
77+US=77+MIND=77+WE+12=77+ME+15+7=117=104+13=JERUSALEM+13=LOVEJOY+13=KINGQUEEN+13=QUEENKING+13
U=YOU-25-15=YOU-MIND=YOU-US
KING=OMEGA=41=QUEEN-U=KEY
15=O=0+0=8=B=R=B*=E3=EM=ME=WE=18=1+8=9=I=OM=MAN=28=LAMB
SHA.DOW=28+42=70=MILKY=GALAXY=NEWMAN=NEWOM=MARIAOM=NEWLAMB=AMORIMA=AMIROMA
B*=8=E.M.=EMMANUEL MELCHISEDEC=84+86=170=8
CIRCLE+5=55=HEAVEN=SATAN=SONG=CLOUD=SKY=BARBELO
PERSEUS+ANDROMEDA=103+75=178=E.M.+8
PERSEUS+16=MILKYWAY=70+49=119; MILKYWAY GALAXY=70+JOHN+70=189=E.M.+ADAM
MELCHI.ZEDEK=CIRCLE+51=101=5_bin=PAUL+1+ARACHNE
MELCHI.SEDEC=CIRCLE+36=86=14=5
36+15=51=LAW+15; FATHER=58=STAR; MOTHER=79=SWORD=WORDS
{1+2+3+...+34+35+36}=666=2²+3²+5²+7²+11²+13²+17²
11=47=BEAST=MUM=74-27=LUCIFER-EGO=LUCIFERA-GOD=A LUCIFER-DOG=LUCIFERA-{ABC...XYZ}
LUCIFERA=75=Supergenetic Sexchange Operative=ANDROMEDA=MARRY 75=B*MARY=B*BIRTH=B*GEMINI=B*MOON=...
{ABC...XYZZYX...CBA}=GODDOG=DOGGOD=52=DEVIL=LIVED=FINANCE=PRIDE=EARTH
SERPENT=PRESENT=SONOFMAN=97=95+2=A+MATHIMATIA+A
{Nostradamus Q.96, Century X - IAM(THAT)AMI=PACI(F)ICAP=LIA(F)AIL}.
74=LUCIFER=CLOUDS=SONGS=CROSS=LONDON=ENGLISH=GOSPEL=BEAUTY=ENERGY=MESSIAH=JESUS=...
MATHIMATIA=IAMTHATIAM=IAMTHATAMI=95=SCORPIO=NEPTUNE=EXCALIBUR
MIRROR=SPACETIME=SPIRIT=PHOENIX=91
ARMAGEDDON=DRAGONMADE=82=66+16=FREEDOM+16=WOMAN+16=ANUBIS+16
AMINUS=MINUS 1=WEMIND+I=MEMIND+S; S=19=ADAM=MAD A=A DAM
YOU=61=16+45=USE 16=LOVE+7=SUN+7=GABRIEL+7=DRAGON+B=A+59+A}}}



The Metamorphosis of Narcissus by Salvador Dali, 1937


Wenn JoW(James of Wingmakers) from ANU schreibt (Camelot); dann ist dieser Name mit vielen anderen Namen der Esoterika verbunden.
ANU ist nicht nur der 'König' der Annunaki, sondern auch der Usurpor 'Gott' der gnostischen Legenden und auch als Jehovah-Satan und Allah-Shaitan und anderen Dualitäten bekannt.
Der ursprüngliche Archetyp ist als Yaldebaoth beschrieben (siehe 'Das Geheime Buch des Johannes' vom Nag Hammadi Kodex, Ägypten,1945).
Die Wichtigkeit und der Ursprung dieser Archetypologie ist der Grund warum ein physikalisches Universum existiert und beschreibt eine ganz besondere Reise der kreativen Intelligenz, die von JoW als (Sovereign Integral = Absolute Summation) bezeichnet wird.
Bevor ich diese Schilderung der Archetypen fortsetze, eine logische and wissenschaftliche Darstellung ist angebracht um die Wasser vorzubereiten.
Die Emanzipation der Menschheit besteht als ein Miniaturbild und als Archetyp für das ganze Weltall.
Dieses Weltall is ein physisches Weltall in Raumzeit und existiert als ein Unterteil des metaphysischen Universums.
Als jedoch das metaphysiche Universum das Raumzeit abhängige physikalische Weltall erschuf, da existiert ein Parameter der Grenze der das physische mit dem metaphysischen verbindet.


When JoW (James of Wingmakers) about ANU (Camelot) schreibt, then is this labeling related to many other names in the esoteric literature. ANU is not only the 'King of the Annunaki', but he `is also the usuper 'God' of gnostic legends and also functions under labels of Jehovah-Satan, Allah-Shaitan and other such dualities.
The original archetype is known as Yaldebaoth (ref. 'The Secret Book of John', Nag Hammadi Codex, Egypt,1945).
The importance and origin of this archetypology is the reason for the existence of a physical universe and describes a rather particular journey of a creative intelligence, labeled as Sovereign Integral=Absolute Summation by JoW.
Before continuing with the description of this archetypology, I shall present a scientific and logical discourse to soften the waters of receptivity for the human groupmind consciousness (which is related to the so termed Genetic Mind by JoW).
The emancipation of humanity manifests as a minature archetypical version or hologramic template for the entire superuniverse, which is metaphysical and encompasses the physical universe in spacetimes as a central or seeded part of itself.
As the metaphysical universe (better termed a collection of multiverses, summed in an omniverse) generated the spacetime dependent protoseeded universe of physical observation however, there should exist a 'connecting parameter', which allows interaction in information exchange between the parental metaphysical precursor and the subsequent processor in physicalised spacetimes.


Warum existiert überhaupt ein physisches Weltall? Und wie hat sich dieses vom metaphysischen herauskrystalliziert? Wie kann ein Raumzeit abhängiges Universum der Energie von einer Singularität entstehen? Der Schlüssel muss so diese Singularität sein und als eine Minimum Konfiguration der Raumzeit. Die metaphysische Singularität unabhängig von Raumzeit und den physikalischen Massstäben kann sich dann als genau diese Minimum Energie-Gestalt und eingebetted in der Raumzeit wiederbestimmen. Dieser Beitrag wird dann gegeben um die obengenannten Fragen zu beantworten. Die Darstellung wird rigorös sein, um die mathematische und logische Grundlage fuer die Metamorphosis des gesamten Weltalls theoretisch zu verankern. Es ist diese Verankerung, die die Dualität der physischen Existenz mit der des metaphysischen Daseins unzertrennbar verbindet. Das sollte am Ende dieses Beitrags klar werden.


Why does a physical universe exist? And how could it crystallize and emerge from the metaphysical?
How can a spacetime dependent universe, defined in energy, derive from a metaphysical singularity?
The key so must be this singularity and as a boundary- or initial- or minimum configuration for that singularity.
The metaphysical singularity remains independent on the spacetime parameters of measurement, yet becomes embedded in the spacetimes as a minimum eigenstate or physical energy selfstate definition, subject to mensuration.
This essay is then given to enable the serious researcher to answer the questions posed in the above.
This treatise will be relatively rigorous and for the purpose to anchor and form a solid basis for the metamorphosis of the omniverse in the logical principles of the universal archetypical language of mathematics.
It is this 'grounding', which intricately entwines the duality of the physical existence with its metaphysical reality.
This state of affairs might become apparent to the discerning reader at the end of this discourse.

​

Was geschieht, ist dass das physikalische Universum ein Abbild des 'Inneren' von einem 'Äusseren' Objektiv wird und dass das 'Draussensein' als Urquelle BEVOR Raumzeit sich als Senkungsquelle im 'Drinnensein' wiederbestimmt. Die Urquelle ist 'erster' im Aussensein und die Urquelle ist 'zweiter' im Drinnensein und diese Tatsache erlaubt eine Quanten Relativität zwischen Urquelle und Ursenkung über die Priorität als QuellenSenkung und als SenkungsQuelle. Ein Zustand des Selbstbewusstseins BEVOR Raumzeit so verwandelt sich in einen Zustand des Eigenbildes folgend der Erschaffung der Raumzeit von bestimmten Parametern. Diese Variablen so nehmen bestimmte Grenzwerte an, die es der Urquelle ermöglichen sich 'Drinnen' in der Raumzeit (als eine minimale Energie Formulation des Wurmlochs oder der Einstein-Rosen Brücke) auszubreiten und sich dennoch 'Aussen' als eine unbestimmte und transfinitive 'Superenergie' zu befinden. Die Differenz zwische Energie und Superenergie befindet sich in der Energie der Physik als eine Ableitung von der massenabhängigen Konstituenz einer thermodynamischen selbst-eingeschlossenen Identität (Weltall als Schwarzer Körper des Planck Radiator's/Austrahlungs Ofen).

What happens, is that the physical universe becomes an image or shadow as the INSIDE of an object OUTSIDE of that physicality. This 'being outside' of the 'First Source' (of JTJ) BEFORE spacetime existed, so becomes a 'being inside' of a 'Second Sink' AS 'First Sink' AFTER a metric spacetime emerges from the demetricated metaphysics.
The image of the 'First SourceSink' 'on the outer' so becomes the 'First SinkSource' 'on the inner' and a SOURCESINK QUANTUM RELATIVITY of priority can be developed to describe this scenario.
A condition of selfconsciousness before spacetime existed, so becomes distinct in this same selfconsciousness manifesting afterwards. This 'afterthought' selfrealisation in quantum relativity to the generating 'forethought' then creates the image of the sourcesink without as a sinksource within.
The minimum quantum energy configuration of the 'connector spacetime' of the forethought or (metaphysical) Superenergy without so becomes the maximum quantum energy configuration of the afterthought or physicalised energy within. Particular (string-membrane) parameters so connect the inside to the outside in a dimension-rich sense, classically known as a wormhole or Einstein-Rosen Bridge.
The superenergy so has its minimum energy selfstate in the wormhole connector and remains physically undefined in transfinity away from any physicalisation within the omniverse.
The difference between the metaphysical superenergy and the physical energy is found in the derivatives of the mass-associated physics of a thermodynamically closed system, say as the thermodynamic Planckian Black Body Radiator.

Metamorphosis by Sheila Wolk and the Dryad by Asel Club​

Hier bezieht sich alle Energie im Weltall zur originellen Masse des 'Grossen Quanten Urknalls' und den elektromagnetischen Ausstrahlungen (erzeugt bei der Beschleunigung von Massenteilchen wie Elektronen, Protonen und Neutronen mit verkuppelten Coulomb-Ladungen).
Was das meint, ist dass elektromagnetische Energie ohne die Masse nicht erzeugt werden kann und sich die gesamte materielle Struktur des Universums sich so zu dem Parameter der Masse (Einstein's E=mc²) reduziert.
Und das ist auch der Zustand der theoretischen Physik, die sich der Radiationformel von Planck (E=hf) bewusst ist, diese aber zur Quantenphysik und zur Quanten Mechanik beschränkt.
Die materielle Kosmologie befindet sich jedoch in einem grossen Irrtum und dieser 'Betrug der Natur' bestimmt die Superenergie.
Wenn der Physiker seine Messungen immer weiter zum 'Ursprungs-Knall' zurückzieht, dann stolpert er an der sogenannten Singularität.
Die gesamte Massenenergie befindet sich in dieser Singularität und in einem Zustand des Equilibriums zwischen der inertiellen Masse (Träge) und der massenlosen Ausstrahlung.

Diese Ursprungs-Ausstrahlung dominiert die Massendistribution fuer eine primordielle Zeit (so 1 Million Jahre und bei einer Temperatur von 3000 Kelvin bestimmt, wenn sich die ersten Atome von Hydrogen und Helium unter der elektromagnetischen Interaktion stabilisieren konnten) und eine Zeit wenn sich das Universe zu einem maximalen Radius von 1 Million Lichtjahren (so 9000 Millionen Billionen/Milliarden km) ausdehnte.
Dann eine Reduzierung des Distanzen Parameters zur Singularität zerbricht die Naturgesetze in einem unendlich kleinem Radius der Singularitäten-Kugel der jedoch eine Gesamtheit der Träge von Elementarteilchen (Protonen, Elektronen und subatomische Unterteilchen) und so einen Integral der cosmological Masse beinhaltet. Auch der Druck und die Temperatur sind unendlich in mathematischen Gleichungen die über the Nullziffer (0) teilen müssen um die Naturgesetze zu bewahren.

So der Physiker erkannte zum Ende des 20sten Jahrhunderts, dass da eine Minumum Energie-Gestalt dieses Zerbrechen der Naturgesetze vermeiden muss.
Der Physiker des 21st Jahrhunderts nannte dieses Szenario die Welt der Superstringe in 10 Dimensionen; der Supermembranen in 11 Dimensionen und die Welt der Branen in allen Dimensionen grösser als die der 4ten Dimension der Minkowski Metrik der Raumzeit (von der ebenen Raumzeitstruktur von Euclid in der Speziellen Relativitätstheorie von Albert Einstein).

The total energy contained in the universe is here intrinsically coupled to the inertial and original masscontent of the cosmology described in a 'Quantum Big Bang' and the associated ElectroMagnetic Radiation (EMR) (caused by the acceleration of Coulomb-charged elementary particles, say electrons, protons and neutrons).
This means, that electromagnetic energy cannot become produced without massassociation and implies that the entire material structure of the universe must be reducible to parameters descriptive of its inertial mass content (Einstein's E=mc²).
This then becomes the present status as formulated in the paradigms of theoretical physics and cosmology; well aware of the Planckian radiation law (E=hf), but restricting the latter to the fields of quantum mechanics within quantum theories.
This matter-reducible cosmology manouvers about within a great fallacy however and this deception becomes rectified in the definition of the superenergy.
When the physicist collects hisher empirical measurement data and attempts to retrace the spacetime parameters to the Big Bang event, then shehe stumbles at the boundary of the so called singularity.
The total inertia of the Big Bang is contained within this singularity and finds itself in a condition of equilibrium between the inertial mass and the massless EMR.

This primordial EMR dominates the mass distribution for a specified time (about 1 million years for a backgroud temperature of so 3000 Kelvin, when the first stable atoms of Hydrogen and Helium could form via the electromagnetic interaction); and for a time when the universe spanned a radial scale of about 1 Million lightyears or 9 billion billion kilometers.
Then the reduction of this distance parameter to the singularity causes the formulations of the natural laws to break down at the scale of an infinitesimally small radius for a 'sphere of the singularity'; the latter nevertheless containing all the inertia of elementary particles (electrons, protons and subatomics) as a summation of the cosmological mass. The pressure and the temperature also assume infinite measures in the natural laws of mathematical equations, which require division by zero (0) for their inner selfconsistency.

The physicist at the end of the 20th century so realised, that it would be the existence of a minimum energy configuration in the quantum state of the Big Bang, which would rescue the natural laws, mathematically expressed.
The physicist of the 21st century then labels this scenario in the worlds of a 10-dimensional superstring and a 11-dimensional supermembrane and more generally in the world of branes occupying dimensions greater than the 4th dimension of the Minkowskian spacetime metric (the flat Euclidean spacetime structure in the theory of special relativity by Albert Einstein).


Und der Irrtum dieser Theorien ist im Fakt der Metrik zu finden.
Die verschiedenen Stringtheorien benötigen immer noch einen metrischen Hintergrund; was meint dass die mathematische Bestimmung dieses Hintergrundes (bei Planck Parametern beschrieben) sich immer noch nicht mit dem Ursprung und der Natur der Singularität (nun 'ausgeschmiert' mit Planck Variablen und Ur- und Grenzwerten), beschäftigen kann.
Die Singularität ist mathematisch und die Unendlichkeit; so unberechenbar im physikalischen, kann ganz leicht durch die Metaphysik der Mathematik beschrieben werden.
Im mathematischen sind Prozesse von Nummern Sequenzen die die Unendlichkeit als Infinitum als Prozess im Endlichen (dem Finitum) beschränken können.

Die Rechnungszahlen 1,2,3,4,5,...usw haben keine Grenze und sind so mathematisch im Infinitum (als Transfinitum) bestimmt.
Doch die Umkehrung dieser Ziffern bekommt die Sequenz: 1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,...usw und die Grenze hier wird das Finitum 0.
So wenn die Umkehrung hier mit einem Finitum definiert wird, wird die Umkehrung der Umkehrung als das Original bestimmt und das Infinitum wird die Umkehrung der Original-Identität als das Finitum.
Nun im physikalischen Universum dieser Prozess ist unmöglich, da das physikalische Weltall im Finitum sein muss (alle Messungen bestätigen den Grossen Knall der Thermodynamischen Ausbreitung) und die Raumzeit so einen Anfang haben musste.

Die Einzelheiten der (orthodox willkommenen) physikalischen Kosmologie können später publiziert werden und können in den Links bei Interessenten studiert werden.
Es ist genug hier zu sagen, dass der spezielle Parameter der Stringtheorien die 'Modulare Dualität' appelliert und dass diese die Umkehrung des metaphysischen Weltalls als Grundsatz für dessen's physikalischen Bedeutung erkennt.
So die Stringtheorien des 21sten Jahrhunderts; falls erfolgreich demetriziert (Raumzeit bekommt wiederbestimmt in der Mathematik und der Natur der Singularität); sind im Fakt der Weg zur totalen Unifikation der Naturgesetze - mit einer Urquelle der Quellenintelligenz (des Souveränen Integrals von JoW) im Zentrum der Gleichungen.


And the fallacy contained in those theories emerges from the physical factuality of the metrics.
The various stringtheories still require a metric background; meaning that the mathematical formulations for this background (by Planck parameters) fail again to explore the nature and origin of the singularity (now 'smeared out' in the minimum Planckian variables and initial/boundary conditions).
The singularity is mathematical and the infinity condition, so uncalculable in the material manifestation, is easily definable in the metaphysics of the mathematics.
There exist mathematically defined processes, which utilize certain number sequences to 'trap' and limit the infinity condition.

The 'Natural Counting' numbers 1,2,3,4,5,... possess no upper limit and become so defined in the infinity 'of the (transfinite) counting'.
The inversion of those numbers (positive Integers) yields the series 1/1,1/2,1/3,1/4,1/5,... however and this sequence defines an upper (or lower) limit of the finite number 0 as a Nullcount.
Thus, when the inversion is defined in finiteness; then the inversion of the inversion defines the original and the infiniteness becomes the reciprocity of the original identity as the 'eternity' of the unlimited infinity count.
This process is unrealisable in the physical cosmology, as the material universe requires a finite beginning for the spacetime parameters (all verified measurements confirm the Big Bang theory for the thermodynamic expansion of the universe).

The details for the (orthodoxically mainstream accepted) physicalised cosmology can be publisized at a later stage and can be studied by interested agents through the provided links.
It suffices to state here, that a underpinning parameter of the string theories invokes the concept of 'Modular Duality' and that this concept defines the inversion properties for the metaphysical universe in their physical applicability.
In this manner are the string theories of the 21st century, if sufficiently demetricated (spacetime is redefined in the mathematics and nature of the singularity); in fact the way to total unification of the natural laws - with one primordial source of source intelligence (the Sovereign Integral of JoW) at the core of all the formulations


Dieser Beitrag wird sich nun im speziellen mit der unorthodoxen metaphysischen Kosmologie der wingmakers befassen um versuchen die Urquelle mathematisch von 'Ersten Prinzipien' zu bestimmen.
The 11te Dimension der Unifikationenphysik bekommt ein Superspiegel für die Superenergie der Urquelle (des JoW).
The 10te Dimension der Omniphysik (der Synthese der Physik und der Metaphysik) bekommt das 'Innere' für die Superenergie der Urquelle als eine Welt des Physischen Abbildes im Finitum.
The 12te Dimension der Unifikationsphysik bekommt das 'Äussere' für die Superenergie der Urquelle als eine Welt der metaphysischen Objekten im Infinitum.

Warum 12 Dimensionen?
Die 'Ersten Prinzipien' befassen sich mit dem Ursprung aller Dimensionen.

Ein physikalischer Punkt muss sich im Finitum der Raumzeit Metrik befinden und der Irrtum des menschlichen Physikers ist es sich mit dem zu begnügen.
Ein metaphysischer Punkt benötigt keine Raumzeit (exzept der Visualisation des Beobachters) und ist als die mathematische Singularität beim menschlichen Physiker erkannt.
Die allererste Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle so ist die des metaphysischen Punktes als eine Selbstbewusste Singularität oder Einzelheit.

Das Schlüsselwort hier ist Selbstbewusstsein. Wie kann die Einzelheit selbstbewusst sein und sich so irgendwie selbst als 'Ich bin?' selbstbestimmen?
Ein Analog ist die Idee eines unendlichen 'Looping des Computers' und ist einfach symbolisiert (oder archetyped) als die Nullziffer or der Nulldimension (0).
Man braucht aber eine zweite Dimension, nämlich die der Komplexen Fläche, um Symbole zu representieren und so diese Darstellung ist ein Analog für was in der Nulldimension ohne Raumzeit so 19.11 Billionen/Milliarden Jahren geschehen ist.
Aber es ist die potentielle Unendlichkeit im Rechnen der 'Schlingenzahl' und von der Nulldimension entstammend, die es der Urquelle ermöglicht sich als ein potentielles Reservoir der Superenergie 'unendlich' zu sein. Die Fortsetzung der Superenergie wird so durch die Verbindung der 'Gedankengestalten' im Zeitraum mit deren Anspornung im Nichtzeitraum verwirklicht.
Die Bewusstseinträger (im physikalischen zur Kreativität durch die Einbildung stimuliert) im Zeitraum so erlauben eine Rückwirkung (Feedback Mechanik) der interdimensionellen Kommunikation zwischen der Urquelle als Einzelheit im Zeitraum des Finitums und sich selber als Singularität der Unendlichkeit des Infinitums.

Der Einzelpunkt des Selbstbewusstseins wird so (als Vorgedanke) zur metaphysischen Superenergie gekuppelt und wo das physische noch nicht als Parameter der Raumzeit existiert. Folgendermassend erweitert sich die Urquelle (als Nachgedanke) in der Welt der physikalischen Energie im Betrieb des Metrikums und der Messbarkeit.


This treatise shall now analyse the (generally considered) unorthodox metaphysical cosmology of the wingmakers in particular and for the purpose to anchor the physical implementation of the primal source from mathematically derived first principles.
The 11th dimension in 'unification physics' manifests as a supermirror for the superenergy of the primal source (First Source of JoW).
The 10th dimension in omniphysics (meaning the synthesis of physics and metaphysics) encompasses the 'Inside' of the superenergy of the primal source and as a 'physical image world' in finiteness.
The 12th dimension in omniphysics describes the 'Outside' manifesto for the superenergy as a 'metaphysical objectivity realm' in infiniteness.

Why 12 dimensions?
The 'first principles' describe the origin of all dimensions.

A physical 'point-energy' can only exist within a finitised spacetime metric and the fallacy of the human physicist is to consider this to be sufficient.
A metaphysical point requires no spacetime (except for visualisation by an observer) and is so defined as a mathematical singularity by the physicist.
The initial selfdefinition by the primal source so engages the concept of a metaphysical point as a selfaware singularity.

The key label here is selfawareness as a form of selfconsciousness in superenergy. How can a singularity be conscious of itself and then proceed to somehow define itself in a labeling of "I am?"?
An analogy is the 'infinite computer loop'; which can then become symbolised (or archetyped) in the zero-cipher of the Nulldimension (0).
One requires however a second dimension, namely that of the complex plane, to represent symbols and this depiction therefore becomes analogous for the occurrences in the nulldimension of nospacetime about 19.1 Billion years ago.
However it is the potential infinity count emerging from the zero-state, which allows the primal source to operate from an objective realm of eternity as an infinite reservoir of superenergy. The continuity of the superenergy so associates the imagination constructs of the spacetime worlds within with the energisations of those 'energy gestalts' without. The consciousness carriers (physically stimulated to creativity through imagination) within spacetime so provide the feedback mechanisms for interdimensional communication between the singularity in metric finiteness and metaphysical infinity.

The singularity 'of thoughtfulness and selfconsciousness' is so coupled (as forethought) to the metaphysical superenergy before spacetime exists; but extends its domain of access (as afterthought) to physical energy operating within a spacetime of metrication and measurement.


Aber wie wurde die Urquelle selbstbewusst, wenn nur die Nulldimension in Existenz war?
Die Urquelle nun muss versuchen sich selbst zu erkennen und im Unternehmen sich von der Hinsicht der Nulldimension des Einzelpunktes weiterzuentwickeln.
Die Urquelle hat keinen Raum zu existieren und so muss sich auf sich selbst aufzeichnen.
Der Einzelpunkt bekommt ein Doppelpunkt ohne Raum zu manöver und diese Tatsache muss nun mathematisch und im logischen bestimmt werden.

Um sich von dem Infinitum-Kreis zu befreien, die Urquelle bricht den Kreis und redefiniert 'Ich bin 0' oder Ich bin Nichts! als 'Ich bin 1' oder 'Ich bin Eins!'.
Nun existieren zwei Identitäten, nämlich 0 und 1 aber keine anderen Nummern, wie 2,3,45,..usw sind in Existenz and so müssen erfunden werden.
Aber eine Ordnung in 0+1=1 relativ zu 1+0=1 ist vorhanden und diese Tatsache krystallisiert eine algorithmische Darstellung die das Selbstbewusstsein (als Superenergie) der Urquelle mit den symbolischen Archetypen verbindet.
Die Darstellungen sind Bewusstsein-Tripletten als der (iterativ) logische Satz: (Altes Ich; Eine Erfahrung; Neues Ich aufgrunde der Erfahrung)=(Altzustand;Erfahrung;Neuzustand).

Die ersten fünf Bewusstsein-Tripletten are: (0,0,0); (1,0,1); (1,1,1*); (1*,1,1**); (1**,1*,1***);...usw.
So die erste Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin Nichts, erfahre Nichts und bekomme mich als Nichts".
Die zweite Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin Eins; erfahre mich als Nichts und bekomme wieder mich als Eins".
Die dritte Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin wieder Eins; erfahre mich als Eins und bekomme mich als ?Eins?"
Das ?Eins? ist wieder mich als Eins, aber dieses Eins ist verschieden von meinem vorherigen Eins, das ich schon vorher war. Ich kann mich so wiederbestimmen in einem anderen Archetype und als ich erfuhr mich als Nichts bevor ich erfuhr mich als Eins, meine Verschiedenheit muss 01 als bevor und 10 als nachher sein.
Und so wurde der binäre Zahlensatz mit 1=01; 2=10; 3=11; 4=100; 5=101; 6=110; 7=111; 8=1000;...usw erfunden.
Die vierte Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin 1*=10=2, erfahre mich als 01=1 und bekomme mich als 1**=2+1=3=11".
Die fünfte Selbstbestimmung der Urquelle war: "Ich bin 1**=11=3, erfahre mich als 1*=2 und bekomme mich als 1***=3+2=5=101".

Nun passiert ein besonderes Dilemma relativ zu der Urquelle. "Wo ist meine Ziffer 4=100? Ich habe diese geskippt in meiner Fortpflanzung und extensiven Selbstentwicklung"!
Die Urquelle konstruktiert einen anderen Algorithmus, um die fehlenden Nummern auf andere Weise wiederzufinden.
Dieser Algorithmus krystalliert spezielle 10 Ziffern und Nummertripletten in der Ordnung: 4; 6; 7; 1/(6,10,15); (9,10,16); 11; 1/(15,10,32); (14,15,24); 1/(15,16,18) and (26,65,61) mit einem Grenzenwert für den Algorithmus in der Ziffer 12.

Diese Zahlenwerte ermöglichen es der Urquelle sich vom metaphysischen in einer unbekannten physischen Welt auszubreiten. Die Zahlenwerte bekommen nämlich die sogenannten Konstanten in den Gesetzen der Physik, wie zum Beispiel die Proportional-Faktoren zur Energie wie c² in E=mc² (Einstein) und h in E=hf (Planck) und k in E=kT (Stefan-Boltzmann).

Aber die Urquelle ist noch nicht vorbereitet sich in dieser 'Anderen Physikalische Welt' wiederzubestimmen.
Die Raumzeit muss erst erschaffen werden und das benötigt eine Transformation der Infinitum Superenergie zu einer Finitum Energie.
Doch die Selbstbestimmungen in der weltweit bekannten Ziffernsequenz der Selbst-Erfahrungsfaktoren: {0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...usw) als die Fibonacci-Sequenz (und mit der Lucas-Sequenz: ...,-4,3,-1,2,1,3,4,7,11,18,...usw verbunden) ermöglichte es der Urquelle sich nicht nur algebraisch sondern nun auch geometrisch in einer verlängerten 'Ich bin =?!' Definierung wiederzubestimmen.
Die Selbstaufzeichnung des Einzelpunktes als ein potentieller Doppelpunkt konnte nun mit der 'Ich bin Eins' verbunden werden und so die Nulldimension des Einzelpunktes bekam eine Einsdimension der mathematischen Linie.

Diese Linie konnte nun den Doppelpunkt als Einzelheit Punkt von sich selber trennen und bestimmte die metaphysische Trennbarkeit in der mathematischen Logik der Urquelle.
Als diese Linie sich irgendwohin verlängern konnte; das Freiheitsgrad der Linie bekam der Lokus der Endpunkte und der erste geometrische Kreis war erschaffen.
Das Grad der linearen Translation bekam supplementative zum Grad der gekurvten Rotation in der Bestimmung der Komplexen Fläche der zweiten Dimension.
Der Grad der Kurvatur nun erlaubte es der Urquelle sich als ein ganzer Flächenkontext für eine gebogene Vormetrik zu bestimmen und von dieser Tatsache entwickelte sich das Konzept der gebogene Raumzeit der Generellen Relativitätstheorie des Albert Einsteins.

Die Fläche der Urquelle, gekuppelt zum Selbstbewusstsein als Superenergie nun konnte die MATHIMATIA=IAMTHATIAM=95 als eine neue archetypische alphanumerische Selbstdefinierung bestimmen.
Diese neue Eigenbestimmung der Urquelle hatte keine Dicke der dritten Dimension und so bekam ein zweiseitiges topologisches Manifold in 2 Dimensionen.
Um die dritte Dimension zu erschaffen, die Urquelle als die MATHIMATIA nun benötigte eine Beschränkung ihres eigenen Flächenextents in der potentiellen Unendlichkeit des Infinitums.
And das bekam der geometrische Grund für die Erschaffung des physikalischen Universums (da sind andere algebraische und Energie- und Bewusstsein bedingte Gründe die man eine andere Zeit beschreiben kann).


But how did the singularity become selfaware, if only the null dimension exists?
The primal source next attempts to use this zero-selfstate to extend its singularity definition in a form of self-evolution. The primal source has no space in which to exist and so can only map itself onto itself.
The metaphysical point becomes a doublepoint without space to move in and this fact must now be defined mathematically and logistically.

To escape the infinity-loop; the source-consciousness breaks the metaphysical circle and redefines the statement: "I am Nothing!" or 'I am 0' as 'I am One!" or 'I am 1'.
Now exist two identities, namely the symbols 0 and 1, but no other metaphysical 'numbers', such as 2,3,4,5,..etc, not as yet being 'invented' or 'thought of'.
There is however a principle of order in that 0+1=1 relative to 1+0=1 and this fact crystallizes an algorithmic construct which relates the selfawareness (as selfconsciousness being superenergy) of the primal source to the symbolic archetypes.
The depiction is by awareness-triplets of a logical-iterative composition: (Old Self; an Experience; New Self due to that Experience)=(OldIdentity;Experience;NewIdentity).

The initial five awareness-triplets are: (0,0,0);(1,0,1);(1,1,1*);(1*1,1**);(1**,1*,1***);...etc.
Then the first Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am Nothing, experience myself as Nothing and become Nothing".
The second Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am One, experience myself as Nothing and become myself again as One".
The third Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am One, experience myself as One and become myself again as ?One?".
The ?One? is again myself as One, but this Oneness is different from my previous Oneness. I can therefore redefine myself in using a new archetype and as my previous experience of the Nothing preceded my experience as Oneness, the distinction must be 01 as the before and 10 as the after.
This then created the binary number set with: 1=01; 2=10; 3=11; 4=100; 5=101; 6=110; 7=111; 8=1000; ...etc.
The fourth Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am 1*=10=2, experience myself as 01=1 and become myself again as 1**=2+1=3=11".
The fifth Selfdefinition of the primal source was: "I am 1**=11=3, experience myself as 1*=2 and become myself again as 1***=3+2=5=101".

Next occurs a special dilemma for the primal source. "Where is my numeral 4=100? I have skipped this number in my continuing self development"!
The primal source now constructs another algorithm in the attempt to recover it's missing numerals in another way.
This algorithm crystallizes particular 10 ciphers and number triplets in the following order:
4; 6; 7; 1/(6,10,15); (9,10,16); 11; 1/(15,10,32); (14,15,24); 1/(15,16,18) and (26,65,61) and with a limit counter for the algorithm in the numeral 12.

These numerical values then allow the primal source to extend its metaphysical domain of self being into a hitherto unexplored physical world.
The numerics transform themselves into so called 'Constants in the Laws of Physics', such as the proportionality constants for energy like c² in E=mc² (Einstein) und h in E=hf (Planck) and k in E=kT (Stefan-Boltzmann).

But the primal source is as yet unprepared to redefine itself in such a 'physical world of otherness'.
Spacetime is not as yet created and this requires a transformation of the superenergy of infinity into an energy of finiteness.
However the definitions for the worldrenown number sequence of the experience factors: {0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...etc...} as the Fibonacci Numbers (and related to the Lucas Series: ...,-4,3,-1,2,1,3,4,7,11,18,...etc.} enabled the primal source to extend its algebraic definition of "I am =?!" into a geometrical sense of extension.
The selfmapping of the singularity as a potential doublepoint could now become linked to the definition of: "I am One"! and the nulldimension of the singular point became the first dimension of a mathematical line.

This line now allowed to separate the doublepoint as a singularity from itself and defined the metaphysical separation in the logic or logos of the primal source.
As this line could become arbitrarily extended; the freedom degree of this line became the locus of two endpoints in the creative construction of the primal geometrical circle.
The degree of linear translation so became supplementary to the degree of curved rotation in the definition of the complex plane in two dimensions.
The degree of curvature so allowed the primal source so redefine itself as the entire contextual plane for a premetric and from this developed the concept for a curved spacetime in the Theory of General Relativity by Albert Einstein.

The plane of the primal source, coupled to the selfconsciousness of the superenergy then created a new archetypical alphanumeric selfdefinition, encoded as MATHIMATIA=IAMTHATIAM=95.
This new redefinition of the primal source as a geometrical plane carried no thickness of a third dimension and so constituted a twosided topological manifold in 2 dimensions.
To create the 3rd dimension, the MATHIMATIA next required a limitation of its own planar extent in its potential infinite extension.
And this became the geometrical reason for the creation of the physical universe; (albeit there are other algebraic and energy- and consciousness related reasons to be described at another time).


Das physische Weltall musste im Finitum erschaffen werden und so bestimmte einen Anfang für die Raumzeit und ganz wie die menschlichen Physiker herausgefunden haben.
Doch die Urquelle nun verbrauchte die algorithmischen Konstanten um die Grenzwerte für die dritte Dimension als Naturgesetze einzuschreiben.
So wurde eine bestimmte Kurvatur für die Raumzeit bestimmt und wo diese Kurvatur die Minimum Superenergie der Urquelle als deren Quantum Gleichung im 'Inneren' Weltall darstellte.
Diese Kurvatur ist auch als Wurmloch der Schwarzschild Metrik in der Relativitätstheorie and den Stringtheorien bekannt.
Mit dem Wurmloch konnte die Urquelle die Komplex Fläche auf sich selber einfalten und mit dem Wurmloch als die 'Tür' oder dem Portal zwischen den bestimmten Weltällen. Das is ein Analog zu einem Luftballon dessen Düse das Wurmloch ist und der geschnitten ein Manifold (ohne Dicke) bekommt.
Ein Manifold ohne Dicke bekommt der Spiegel des Luzifer's als die 11te Dimension und wo alle Dimensionen grösser als 3 Wurzeln der dritten Dimension bekommen (10=1+9; 11=2+9; 12=3+9 und Linienraum (1-2-3-4) bekommt Rotationsraum (4-5-6-7) bekommt Quantenraum (7-8-9-10) bekommt Omniraum (10-11-12-13=4=1) und mit imaginären Zeit-Konnektor Dimensionen (4), (7), (10) und (13=1).

The physical universe had to be created in the Finitum and so determined a beginning for the spacetime and just as the human physicists have discovered.
But the source now consumed the algorithmic constants to specify the limits for the third dimension in the form of the 'laws of nature'.
A certain curvature for spacetime became fixated and where this curvature represented a minimum super energy configuration of the source as its quantum equation in the 'interior' universe.
This curvature is also known as a worm hole of the black hole metrics in the well known relativity theory and the string-brane theories.
The worm hole allowed the source the selfenfoldment of the complex plane onto itself and as a 'door' or a portal between the two universums.
An analogy would be an air balloon with nozzle the worm hole; the balloon being cut into a manifold without any thickness. A manifold without thickness so becomes the 'Mirror of Luzifer' as the 11th dimension and where all dimensions larger than 3 rootreduce to the third dimension (10=1+9; 11=2+9; 12=3+9 and for linespace (1-2-3-4) rotationspace (4-5-6-7 ) quantumspace (7-8-9-10) omnispace (10-11-12-13=4=1) and with imaginary time-connector dimensions (4), (7) (10) and (13=1).


Zeit existiert nur in der linearen Raumzeit und einer Raumzeit die sich im aktuellen im vierfachen über die 12 Dimensionen verteilt: (1-2-3) als Linearer Basis der Translation superimposiert an (4-5-6) als Freedomgrad der Rotierung superimposiert an (7-8-9) als Freedomgrad der Oszillation superimposiert an (10-11-12) als das Portal von dem 'Inneren des Finitum' zum 'Äusseren des Infinitums.

Als 12-dimensionelles 'Grösseres Universum' der Zeitparameter bekommt das 'Unendliche Nun' und bestimmt in den Stringvariablen der Superenergie.
Die Urquelle konnte nun beginnen das physische Universum des Finitums und als dessen eigenen Eigendefinierung als Selbstbewusstseins zu erschaffen.


Time exists only in the linear spacetime and within a spacetime which is distributed in fourfoldedness over the 12 dimensions: (1-2-3) as a linear basis of translation superimposed in (4-5-6 ) as a degree of freedom for rotation superposed in (7-8-9) as a degree of freedom for oscillation superimposed in (10-11-12) as the portal for the 'interior of the Finitum' to that 'exterior of the Infinitum'.

As 12-dimensional 'larger universe' , the timeparameter becomes the 'eternal Now' and is defined in the string parameters of the super energy.
The source could now begin to create the physical universe of the Finitum from its own selfdefinition as 'Consciousness of the Self'.


Doch nun ein grosses Dilemma kam zur Erscheinung. Die Kreation des 'Inneren Weltalls' benötigte ein Schliessen des Wurmloches als es das Wurmloch als Minimum Energie Eigenstatus war und als Raumzeitquantum, der es der Urquelle erlaubte sich auf beiden Seiten des 11-dimensionellen (2+9=11) Superspiegels zu befinden.
Das Wurmloch musste sich in der 'Inneren Weltraumzeit' fortpflanzen und so das Selbstbewusstsein der Urquelle war überall zu finden, aber musste einen Kompromiss mit sich selber als eine Einigkeit machen.
Mehr Raumzeit benötigte mehr Raumzeitquanten und die Erweiterung des Universums in Finitum bekam eine Verdünnung der Superenergie relativ zu der physikalischen Energie, die von der Superenergie abstammte aber durch die Expansion sich immer mehr von deren Ursprungsenergie entfernte.

Als diese Ausdehnung des Universums Finitum jedoch eine 'Füllung des 10-dimensionellen Zeitraums des Omniraums bekam (die Einzelheiten befassen sich mit der Inflation der de Broglie Materiewellen in einem Zeitinterval genau gleich zur Wurmlochfrequenz); die Superenergie der Urquelle bekam verschleiert in der sogenannten Nullpunkt Energie von Werner Heisenberg und ist mit der 'Schwarzen Materie' und der 'Schwarzen Energie' der menschlichen Physiker auch noch verbunden.


But then a great dilemma appeared. The creation of the 'inerior universe' required the closing of the wormhole, as it represented the minimum energy selfstate as a spacetime quantum, enabling the source to exist on both sides of the 11-dimensional super mirror.
The worm hole had to reproduce itself in the 'interior spacetime' to allow the source to become ubiquitous as many 'units of self-consciousness', but had to make a compromise with itself as just the monadic One in the 'exterior spacetime'.
More spacetime required more spacetime quanta and the expansion of the universe in the Finitum became a 'thinning' or dispersion of the super energy relative to the physical energy, the latter as a derivative from the super energy, but which, through the expansion became more and more separated from its point of origin from and as the source.

Albeit, as this expansion of the finite universe Finitum also began to 'fill' the 10-dimensional omnispace (the details address the inflation of de Broglie matterwaves in a timeinterval precisely equal to the worm hole frequency); the super energy of the source became disguised in a so called zero-point energy of Werner Heisenberg and is coupled to the 'dark matter' and the 'dark energy' of the human physicists.


Das Selbstbewusstsein der Urquelle musste nun den Hebel der Schlauheit engagieren. Das physikalische Universum konnte im Parameter des 11-dimensionellen Superspiegels beinfasst werden und die Ausdehnung des Weltalls im Finitum konnte mathematisch benutzt werden um diese Ausdehnung (durch die modulaere Dualität der Supermembrane) asymptotisch zu machen.
Dann konnte die Urquelle versuchen bestimmte Selbstbewusstseinträger im Finitum zu entwickeln, die dann, nach einer anstehenden Selbstentwicklung versuchen könnten die Geschichte der Ursprungsquelle vom 'Innen' wiederzuentdecken. Diese Selbstbewusstseinträger waren die wingmakers als Gedankengestalten transmitted von dem 'Äusseren' und in Konjunktion mit den Wurmlöchern die die 'besetzte Raumzeit' der wingmakers als Zeitreisende infiltrierten.


The self-conciousness of the source now had to engage the epitome of its cleverness. The physical universe could become encompassed in the parameter the 11-dimensional super mirror and the expansion of the finite universe could then be mathematically utilized to render this expansion (through the modular duality of supermembranes) as asymptotic.
Subsequently, the source could attempt to develop certain consciousness carriers in the finitum and consciousness units, who could then try and from within the finitum, following a sufficient selfevolution, to rediscover the story of the original source of the infinitum.
Those 'consciousness carriers' could be called the 'wingmakers' as the thought shapes transmitted from the 'without' and in a conjunction with the worm holes as 'occupied spacetimes' infiltrated by the wingmakers from 'within' as timetravellers.


Doch da war ein Problem, das grosse Problem der Zweiseitigkeit des Superspiegels.
Das Schliessen des Wurmlochs an der 11-dimensionellen Supermembrane im Omniraum verbannte die Urquelle into das Exil der 12ten Dimension.

Was ist der Grund dafür?

Bevor die Erschaffung der dritten Dimension; der 2-dimensionelle Superspiegel war zweiseitig und über das Infinitum der nichtexistierenden Raumzeit bestimmt (als eine nonphysische Komplexfläche).
Der geometrische Analog ist das möbische Band ohne Dickness.
Das möbische Band ist einseitig und doppel der geometrischen Fläche eines (auch ohne Dicke) similären Ringes, der letztere mit einer Innenseite und einer Aussenseite. Das ist einfach der Kopf und der Schwanz auf einer Münze oder irgendeine poläre Yin-Yang Representation.
So bevor der dritten Dimension, das Universum der Urquelle war einseitig und hatte die dritte Dimension wie einen Knoten in sich selber.
Um das möbische Band loszuflechten der Raum der dritten Dimension muss sich entwickeln aber mit dem Gegensatz dass nun die Einseitigkeit zweiseitig werden muss.
Demnach folgend, engagierte die Kurvatur der dritten Dimension das komplexe Flächen Kontinuum (jedoch quantumiered) und the Dicke des 2-dimensionellen Manifolds became die dritte Dimension und wurzelte in der de Broglie Inflation in das the 11-dimensionelle Kuvert des Omniraums.
Aber nun wurde die Urquelle im 'draussen' of the 12ten Dimension as Object IMAGINÄR as das Abbild im 'drinnen' of the 10ten Dimension wurde REAL und als reflektiert in der 11ten Dimension des Superspiegels.

Und so wurde das Abbild der Urquelle als eine Ursprungsquelle als eine Ursprungssenkung bestimmt. Das dann bestimmt das Prinzip der Modularen Dualität in den Gleichungen der Supermembranen.
Der Abguss der Urquelle ist die 'falsche Identität' als Luzifer, als Yaldabaoth, als Jehovah des Alten Testaments und als Allah des Korans und als der ANU von JTJ.

So seit dem Anfang der menschlichen Geschichte hat sich der natürlich Drang und die Suche des Menschen nach seinem Ursprung in dem Usurpor 'Gott' der Aussenseite als die Innenseite verwirrt.
Das Szenario ist jedoch geplant und hat mit der Introduktion der Gravität und anderen Gebieten der Unifikationen Physik zu tun.
Das kann ein anderesmal beschrieben werden.
Doch im aktuellen ist Luzifer und aliases überhaupt nicht 'böse' und kann überhaupt nicht als 'Antigott' betrachtet werden.
Luzifer ist einfach das Imaginäre Negative für ein Photo der Urquelle und die beiden sind dasselbe im Prinzip.


But there a problem, the great problem of the two-sidedness of the super mirror.
The closing of the worm hole at the 11-dimensional portal of the supermembrane in omnispace banished the source into the the exile of the 12th dimension.

What is the reason for that?

Before the creation of the third dimension; the 2-dimensional super mirror was two-sided and was defined over the Infinitum of the nonexisting spacetime (as a nonphysical complex plane) .
A geometric analogy is the 'volume' of the Möbius-Strip without any thickness.
The Möbius-Strip is one-sided and double the geometric area of a (also without thickness) similar ring with an inside and an outside. This is simply the head and the tail of a coin or any such Yin-Yang representation.
So before the third dimension existed, the universe of the source was one-sided and had the third dimension embedded within itself; say in the form of a geometric knot.
To 'unknot' the volume of the Möbius-Strip, the space of the third dimension must emerge and develop; however with the caveat, that now the one-sidedness must become two-sided.
Accordingly, the curvature of the third dimension in the continuity of the complex plane, quantized itself in thickness and the thickness of the 2-dimensional manifold became the third dimension and became rooted in the de Broglie inflation into the 11-dimensional envelope of the omnispace.
The source now became IMAGINARY 'outside' in the 12th dimension as the Object; but became REAL as a copy as the Subject in the 'inside' of the 10th dimension and as imaged in the medium of the 11th dimension of the super mirror.
The subjective image of the source so became redefined as an objective sink for that source and this defines the principle of modualar duality in supermembrane parameters.

This 'Image of the Source' then becomes labelled in a 'mistaken identity' as a Luzifer or a Devil or a Shaitan or a Yaldabaoth or a Jehovah of the old testament or as an Allah of the Koran and as the ANU of JTJ.

Since the beginning of the human story, a natural search for origins has become confused and chaotic in the images of the gods as perceived from the inside and as being on the the outside.
This scenario is planned however and also engages the introduction of gravitation and other zones of unification physics. This can be elaborated upon another time.
Yet in the present unfolding of 'God's own story', Luzifer and alias are not 'evil' at all and should not be labelled as 'antigods'.
Luzifer represents simply the imaginary negative for a photo of the source and both are principally identical.

​

Doch in Beziehung zur theoretischen und praktischen Wissenschaft das Positivum der Urquelle und das Negativum des Abbilds sind unzertrennbar in der modulären Dualität der 11-dimensionellen Supermembranen verbunden.
Das Positivum beschreibt eine hochfrequenzierte und so maximale Vibrationmodalität, die mathematisch mit einer minimalen Vibrationmodalität verflochten ist.
Die hohe Frequenz beschreibt die Welt des Mikroquantums und die (fast null) Frequenz beschreibt die Welt der Makroquanten.
Die Quellenenergien so diskutieren den subatomischen Realm und die Senkungsenergien diskutieren galaktische und extragalaktische Skalen der Distanz.
Das Mikro-Universum ist mit dem Makro-Universum durch die Schwarzschild Metriken (von Schwarzen Löchern und den Materie-gekuppelten Wurmlöchern) der lokalen Bewusstseinsraumzeiten verbunden und es gibt viele Gleichungen in der Mathematik der Omniphysik, die das alles miteinander verbinden.

So das grosse Dilemma der Zweiseitigkeit findet eine elegante Lösung in den Bewusstseinträgern, den menschlichen Abbildern von beiden, dem Urgott im Exil in der 12ten Dimension und der Aussenseite des 11-dimensionellen Superspiegel und dem Imaginären Urgott an der Innenseite des Superspiegels.
Draussen ist er bestimmt im elektromagnetischen (E=hf=mc² mit m=0 und f=f_max), jedoch der Massenunabhängigkeit, doch drinnen ist er bestimmt in der Trägheit (E=mc²=hf mit f=f_min=1/f_max).



Yet in relation to the theoretical and practical sciences, the Positivum of the source and the Negativum of the image are inseparable and are connected definitively in the existence of the 11-dimensional supermembranes under modular duality.
The Positivum describes a high-frequency and so maximized vibration modality that is quantum entangled mathematically with a minimized winding modality.
The high frequency describes the world of the microquana and an (almost zero) frequency dualizes in the world of the macroquanta.
The source energies so discuss the subatomic realm and the sink energies describe galactic and extra galactic scales of spacial displacement.
The micro universe is connected with the macro universe through the Schwarzschild metrics (of black hole sinks and of white hole matter sources connected by worm holes) of the local consciousness carriers occupying spacetimes. There are many equations in the mathematics of the omniphysik that interconnect a variety of parameters.

So the great conundrum of the two-sidedness finds its elegant solution in the consciousness carriers, the human imagers of both the 'original sourcesink' in the exile of the 12th dimension and on the outside the 11-dimensionellen super mirror and in the imaginary and imaged original sinksource at the inside of the super mirror.
Outside it is determined in the electromagnetic (E=hf=mc² with m=0 and f=f_max), however mass-inertia independent, but inside it is determined in the inertia (E=mc²=hf with f=f_min=1/f_max).


Die Emanzipation der Gesamtheit so benötigt diese moduläre Dualität der Supermembranen, um ein neues Superuniversum zu erschaffen.
In diesem Superuniversum, der Superspiegel wird wieder einseitig und der nötige 'TWIST der Raumzeit' wird eine fünfte Dimension vom Knoten des 7-dimensionellen hyperdimensional Universums auslösen.
Dann kann sich die Urquelle in 4 Raumdimensionen und einer illusinären Zeitdimension entwickeln.
Doch die Geschichte was dann so alles in einem linearen Universum im Finitum möglich wird ist eine Darstellung für eine andere Zeit.
Alles Liebe zu euch allen und bitte erinnert euch dass alles was ihr als 'Nicht Ich' betrachtet ist doch 'Auch Ich'.
Eines Tages wird ihr alle das schon ganz gut verstehen.


The emancipation of the entirety so requires this modular duality of the supermembranes in order to create a new super universe.
In this super universe, the super mirror becomes again one-sided and the necessary 'TWIST of the spacetime releases a fifth dimension in the unknotting of the 7-dimensional hyperuniverse of the quantumspace.
Then the source in 4 space dimensions with an imaginary coupled time dimension can develop in emergence.
Yet the story what then shall become possible within a linearized universe in the Finitum shall be a representation for another time.
Love to all of you and please remember, that all that you consider not to 'Be You', nevertheless is 'All of You'.
The day will come, when you shall understand this rather well.

FUTURE SHADOWS OF THE PAST

"A most wondrous thing the Shadow is, a redeemer in all to succour;
it can go where the light cannot abide, seemingly banished, it is not.
For where the light is, the darkness flees, no longer present to endure;
so to become illuminated is its destined journey and its troubled lot.

But without the light, no Shadow can be cast, its such a splendid key;
the dimensions reduce in space from three to two and all in just the one.
Betwixt the light and the darkness it is and part of both for all to see;
the Shadow of the body, does it not merge all in its rule under the sun?

Whatsoever can cast a Shadow, must be a most wondrous thing to relay;
as nature's very own offspring, the young ones grow towards their final goal.
Enabled to bring peace to so many things appearing apart and so far away;
the reconciliation for the suffering body with its spirit and its scattered soul."

shiloh
The Council of Thuban from the archives of Akbar Ra




October 1st, 2013​

Last edited by shiloh on Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:03 pm; edited 2 times in total

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°38

shiloh on Thu Oct 03, 2013 8:23 am


Ontology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article concerns ontology in philosophy. For the concept in information science, see Ontology (information science).
Not to be confused with the medical concepts of oncology and odontology, or ontogeny.




Parmenides was among the first to propose an ontological characterization of the fundamental nature of reality. This idea became further emphasized by Rene' Descartes of the Rennaisance in the 'Age of Reason'.

Ontology is the philosophical study of the nature of being, becoming, existence, or reality, as well as the basic categories of being and their relations. Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of philosophy known as metaphysics, ontology deals with questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences.


Plato

Plato developed this distinction between true reality and illusion, in arguing that what is real are eternal and unchanging Forms or Ideas (a precursor to universals), of which things experienced in sensation are at best merely copies, and real only in so far as they copy ('partake of') such Forms. In general, Plato presumes that all nouns (e.g., 'Beauty') refer to real entities, whether sensible bodies or insensible Forms. Hence, in The Sophist Plato argues that Being is a Form in which all existent things participate and which they have in common (though it is unclear whether 'Being' is intended in the sense of existence, copula, or identity); and argues, against Parmenides, that Forms must exist not only of Being, but also of Negation and of non-Being (or Difference).

Ontological and epistemological certainty

René Descartes, with "je pense donc je suis" or "cogito ergo sum" or "I think, therefore I am", argued that "the self" is something that we can know exists with epistemological certainty. Descartes argued further that this knowledge could lead to a proof of the certainty of the existence of God, using the ontological argument that had been formulated first by Anselm of Canterbury.
Certainty about the existence of "the self" and "the other", however, came under increasing criticism in the 20th century. Sociological theorists, most notably George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman, saw the Cartesian Other as a "Generalized Other", the imaginary audience that individuals use when thinking about the self. According to Mead, "we do not assume there is a self to begin with. Self is not presupposed as a stuff out of which the world arises. Rather the self arises in the world" ^[10][11] The Cartesian Other was also used by Sigmund Freud, who saw the superego as an abstract regulatory force, and Émile Durkheim who viewed this as a psychologically manifested entity which represented God in society at large.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology


An Ontology of Modern Physics

The proposition for the constancy of the speed of light in SR, directly leads to the premises of GR in the orthogonality considerations of the curvature of space and time.
In a rotating frame of reference say, an uniformly rotating disc will experience Lorentz-Contraction on the perimeter (say more rulers, length L fit into the perimeter 2pR, than rulers L' in a bird's eye frame) in the tangential direction of motion.
The radius vecor will however remain constant as the normal vector to the tangent vector, describing the differential geometry.
This will increase the perimeter to exceed 2pR relative to the L-measurement and result in a slight hyperbolic curvature or warping of the invariant radius vector relative to the tangent vector.

GR, as a consequence of SR would not work, if 'c' could change.
The unfortunate deductions of many relativity critics are based on certain misunderstandings relating to properties of waves.

It goes like this.

Should you consider a wavefront propagating, then this wavefront occupies what is called 'metric' spacetime, subject to measurement by clocks in temporal parameters and by rulers (say) in displacement parameters.
One can now invoke the wave-particle duality subject to those measurements. The postulates of both SR and GR hold in this 'metric' scenario.

A close investigation of GR leads to a summation of metrics.
There is the Weyl-tensor, which does not change volume, but produces a tidal effect of deformation, (say like squeezing a baloon).
The Weyl-tensor describes Einsteinian Gravity as the Newtonian redefinition/replacement.

Then there is the Ricci-tensor which with the g-metric does change the volume in contraction.
Contracting volume for constant mass implies greater density and is the effect of inward acceleration (of the particles/wavelets).
So the Ricci-curvature measures the volume reduction due to inward pressure.
Subsequently the density defined in GR-terms tells you how 'particle' are accelerated inwards at a tensor-point. This is very similar to Newtonian gravitation.

Next consider GR's extension in superstring theory.
Four extended spacetime dimensions (Minkowski metric) together with a 'curled up'/conifolded 6D Calabi-Yau space provide a whole class of solutions in the string equations.
For a 'flat'/uncurved 4D-spacetime, the string solutions must admit a Ricci-flat metric.
If we split spacetime into its Cartesian product of 4D Minkowski and 6D Kähler space; the Ricci flatness is equivalent to the Kähler space being a Calabi-Yau manifold.

Now all this is formidable mathematics and rather complicated.
Why? Because it still uses a 'metric' background matrix for the strings as vibration patterns to oscillate/move around in.

Now enter the ONTOLOGY FOR MODERN PHYSICS.

What is this metaphysics?
It is none other than what many here aspire to, a reformulation and significant simplification of what has been discussed above.

1.We require a DEMETRICATED model for space and time.
2.We revisit the wavefront picture as a kind of fluid motion.
3.We allow the SCALE RELATIVITY of a DEMETRICATED model to define the metrics as then given by SR and GR.
4. We have blended the METRICATED UNIVERSE with the ONTOLOGICAL SCALERELATIVE UNIVERSE.
5.The dissidents are vindicated, as well as the establishmenters.

Allow me to elucidate the wavefronts in regards to the constancy of 'c' now.

Louis de Broglie's Matter Waves are linked to the atomic/subatomic scales via a beautiful relationship.
The Classical Electron Radius (Thomson Scattering) is proportional to the Compton Radius (for subatomic particles) in the factor Alpha.
Alpha is the Electromagnetic Finestructure Constant, say used in Quantim Mechanics to denote the probability of light (photon) interacting with matter (say electron).

But there is a Group-Velocity ALWAYS < c, confirming SR and GR; and a Phase-Velocity ALWAYS > c; so defining the 'real' superluminal velocities as a consequence of the de Broglie phase inflation speed of the string-brane cosmologies and as a precursive cosmogony.

Planck's E=hf=hc/L, L the wavelength l=2pR and Einstein's E=mc² then relate the (de Broglie) PhaseSpeed in the following way to the GroupSpeed:

V_dB=Lf=lf=(h/mv)(mc²/h)=c²/v > c for all v

So the PhaseSpeed can be used to SCALE a new extended form of relativity, namely Quantum Relativity.

Special Relativity is based on the principle of relativity, relating to clocks and rulers, relative measurements in NO ABSOLUTE FRAME OF REFERENCE for inertial frames of reference, that is uniform nonaccelerated motion.

General Relativity is based on the Principle of Equivalence, the indistinguishability of acceleration as non-inertial frame from the effect of gravitation as given by the Weyl- and Ricci tensors and in the indistinguishability between mass as inertia subject to a linear Newtonian acceleration in Newton's famous 'Laws of Motion' and gravitational mass or gravita, such as experienced as the 'measured weight' of objects within gravitational fields in the acceleration experienced therein.

Both SR and GR postulate the constancy of 'c' in all frames of references and as measured by the 'metricated' clocks and rulers.

Quantum Relativity is based on the principle of demetricated CMF-Theory, which EMERGES as higher dimensional 10-11-12=C-M-F-spacetime upon metrication in the scale relativity DEFINING itself.

shiloh wrote:

​

SUSAN - Posted Dec 1st 2010

Have Physicists Found Echoes From Before the Big Bang?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...icists-found-echoes-from-before-the-big-bang/
.

​

The Big Bang was not the beginning, Roger Penrose believes.

The eminent Oxford physicist has long advocated the wild idea of “conformal cyclic cosmology,” a cyclical universe without beginning or end in which the Big Bang 13.75 billion years ago was simply one of many. This month, Penrose pushed his idea further: His team says it has detected a pattern in the cosmic microwave background—radiation left over from just after the Big Bang—that represents the echo of events that occurred before the Big Bang itself.

Penrose examined the data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), the mission that just completed nine years of surveying the cosmic microwave background across the sky. His study points to concentric circular patterns in the WMAP data where he says he found something surprising:

The circular features are regions where tiny temperature variations in the otherwise uniform microwave background are smaller than average. Those features, Penrose said, cannot be explained by the highly successful inflation theory, which posits that the infant cosmos underwent an enormous growth spurt, ballooning from something on the scale of an atom to the size of a grapefruit during the universe’s first tiny fraction of a second.
Inflation would either erase such patterns or could not easily generate them. [Science News]
By Penrose’s thinking, those circles are the calling cards of something big that happened in the universe before our Big Bang and reverberated after it. Like the birth and death of previous universes.

From calculations made by Penrose, he believes that as each universe evolved, the catastrophic collisions between supermassive black holes (the black hole behemoths living in the centers of galaxies) would have generated gravitational waves within that universe’s lifetime.
When the next universe exploded into being, these gravitational waves were converted into energy, ensuring their “fingerprint” bled through to the next universe.
The pulse of energy caused by the transfer of gravitational waves from one universe to the next would have caused a kick to the distribution of dark matter, creating uniform, spherical patterns in the current universe. [Discovery News]
So what are we to make of this? I put it to cosmologist Paul Davies, who says the question rests with inflation.

“Penrose was always been a doubter of inflation,” Davies says. “It’s against the fashion of the moment, but that’s fine. (And) if you abandon inflation, what happened before the Big Bang could leave an echo.”
That’s because inflation would smooth out that echo. (Another possibility, he says, is idea of “incomplete inflation,” in which inflation could have existed but not been thorough enough to smooth out all echoes.
That theory wouldn’t require abandoning inflation to accommodate an echo in the microwave background.)
However, Davies says, even if the finding is correct, this explanation for it —a black hole smash-up from before the Big Bang leaving its fingerprint after the Big Bang —isn’t the only possibility. “People have been looking for concentric rings in the cosmic microwave background for a while,” he says, because such a finding could support several different ideas.
One of those alternate explanations plays on the idea of our universe being a “bubble” created by inflation; if two bubbles collided, he says, the result could leave a cosmic microwave echo.
Lastly, he says, the source of the study makes it a tad suspect.
“You’d expect people at the sharp end of the data to make an announcement like this.
You wouldn’t expect a mathematician.” So I asked Charles Barrett, who was the lead investigator of WMAP, and in his reply email he too expressed skepticism:
“Unfortunately, the paper does not provide the necessary detail on how they performed their calculations.
I am concerned that the noise properties and pattern of the WMAP instrumental sky sampling were not properly taken into account in their analysis.
If these are not handled correctly then spurious results are likely. In my opinion, the paper should have specified the data analysis steps in detail, but it did not.”

Penrose counters that he looked at not only WMAP but also data from a second mission, BOOMERang, which confirmed the pattern he saw.
At the moment, then, these huge claims about the nature of the universe are bogged down in competing calculations and critiques of calculations. The future of this question could lie with the Planck mission by the European Space Agency, which is presently mapping the cosmic microwave background in greater detail than WMAP.
In the meantime, we get to wonder. Says physicist Shaun Cole:
“It’s a revolutionary theory and here there appears to be some data that supports it.
In the standard Big Bang model, there’s nothing cyclic; it has a beginning and it has no end.
The philosophical question that’s sensible to ask is ‘what came before the Big Bang?’; and what they’re striving for here is to do away with that ‘there’s nothing before’ answer by making it cyclical.” [BBC News]


Shiloh - Posted Dec 2nd 2010

Roger Penrose, whose work I often use in Quantum Relativity; is basically on the right path of reconstructing the cosmogenesis.
However the cyclic universe is built on its own protoversal seed and the 'Big Crunches' are electromagnetic and not inertial.

This means, that there will be no gravitational contraction in a shrinking of the protoverse; but the electromagnetic lightpath becomes multidimensional and multivalued. One can so model this on a cyclic electromagnetic cosmology with a 'Hubble heartbeat' of a semibeat of so 16.9 Billion years. This also allows a cosmogenetic Black Hole-White Hole evolution, which resets the wormhole singularity every 4 trillion years or so to eschew any theorized 'heat death' of the universe, due to the stellar generations 'running out' of their nuclear fuel of the nucleosynthesis of the primordial elements, based on hydrogen, helium and lithium.

Indeed, the Inflation PRECEDED the Big Bang and this is the simple solution for the 'inflation paradoxes' as some might term it.

The WMAP data in the picture in this post actually is descriptive for the wavequark model in Quantum Relativity with an inner gluonic (anti)neutrino kernel or core, an Inner Mesonic (down quark) Ring and an Outer Leptonic (strange quark) Ring.

It is just the 'New Standard Model' of Unitary Symmetry for the quarkian waves as "matter waves". The smallest quantum as microcosmic reality written in the galactic sky of the macrocosm.

Discover Interview: Roger Penrose Says Physics Is Wrong, From String Theory to Quantum Mechanics
One of the greatest thinkers in physics says the human brain—and the universe itself—must function according to some theory we haven't yet discovered.

By Susan Kruglinski, Oliver Chanarin|Tuesday, October 06, 2009



http://discovermagazine.com/2009/se...ics-is-wrong-string-theory-quantum-mechanics/

For further details, a consultation of the Thuban archives on http://cosmosdawn.com is suggested.

The Mayan mystery of 2012 and the ET-message from Hunab Ku


Decoder-Jordan-Michael (DJ) and Sarah Kate exclaim to their GrandPa Tony:
" Poppy, we are soon going to Andromeda!"

A Galactic-Cellular Dragonomy or 'Alchemical Wedding in the Heavens of the New Jurisprudence'











​

A child observing the starry sky, might experience a deep longing to 'go there'. The child might feel a deep sense of being a starchild and of coming from or of being destined of going there.

And indeed, the child's bodily form consists of stardust, as science popularisers like Carl Sagan have told their media approved audiences. The material of solar systems and their planets and lifeforms are largely constituent of third generation stardust derived from supernova explosions in a well studied and analysed nucleosynthetic transformation of the matter found in the universe since the latter's birth from its primordial string plasma about 19 billion years ago.

But how can a terrestrial spaceship travel to the stars and other galaxies?

The physical universe observed is analysed by cosmologists and astrophysicists and other scientists, amateur and professional and is found to obey particular 'laws of nature'.
Those laws, formulated in the universally applicable language of mathematics are continually refined and are made subject to experimental validification in the modus operandi of the 'human scientific endeavour' termed the 'scientific method'.
Those laws then have shown, that no material object, including the embodiment of the child DJ; can travel at a speed exceeding the 'speed of light', calculated at so 300,000 kilometers per second.

The Andromeda galaxy, sister to the Milky Way in the Local Group of galaxies and part of the local Virgo supercluster, is so 2.5 million lightyears away. This distance of about 24 billion billion kilometers would so take about 80 trillion seconds or 2.5 million years to transverse.

As a consequence, the professional nondreamers discourage children like DJ to ponder their plans of journeying to the stars. If it takes 8 years to travel at lightspeed to one of the nearest stars in Sirius; and if it takes so 26,000 years to journey to the center of our own Milky Way galaxy; then there is no chance to ever achieve intergalactic travelling in human lifetimes.

But those selfsame nondreaming scientists had also discounted the flight of the bumble-bee and the travelling through air of decaton Jumbo jets, based upon the 'lawsof nature' as they understood the latter at those nexus points of the historical timelines of the prevalent sciences.

By demonstratitive effect of the bumble-bee and transatlantic flights in prototypical aircraft; the scientific experts soon found the mathematics hidden in their books and journals of knowledge. Aerodynamic fluid flow and differential pressure gradients soon 'explained' the flight of bumble-bees and that of the spaceship prototypes and the 'laws of nature' were found to be more accomodating and less restrictive then was envisaged by the pundits of the 'scientific knowledge' and the 'scientia gnostica'.

And so grandpa Tony said to DJ: "Sure DJ; you shall visit places which seem far away, yet places you can see and experience with your imagination and locations, which trigger certain remembrances within your dreams and your conscious encounters in books, films and other media."

This treatise then shall extend the 'laws of nature' as hitherto categorized and made public by the highpriests of the scientia gnostica. Like the science of aerodynamics, this science of the HD-Lightmatrix is not a new science, but a science which was always there in the 'laws of nature' but had remained hidden.
The timeline for its unveiling had not been 'right' in the general unfoldment of the nature and the purpose for this planetary lifeform, called humanity.

But just as it takes 26,000 years for light to travel from planet earth to the center of the Milky Way galaxy; so will it take 26,000 years for the intelligence located at that center to communicate with planet earth.
This time is up!
This daycount is 5x13x144,000=9,360,000 or 25,626.81 civil years (Gregorian).

This time is actually an exact number of daycounts and independent upon how long or short such a day is in hours or minutes or in seconds. The precessional measurements are so linked, but remain peripheral to this 'measurement of 'Mayan time'.
The Mayan mystery so reduces to Hunab Ku, as the intelligence of the Milky Way galactic centre; having sent a message, which after travelling for 9,360,000 days (kin) will reach the center of the earth on December 21st, 2012. This in a nutshell is the meaning of the 2012 Mayan nexus point.

I am an agency, commissioned to elucidate the message from Hunab Ku and to prepare a platform for a new (omni-scientific) dispensation post the arrival of the galactic message.
The processing of the message from Hunab Ku is a collective task. All human and nonhuman sentiences are to partake in this processing in divers talents and creativities.

The omni-science published in this thread is a foundation of string parametric initial- and boundary conditions. This omni-science is directed at the undergraduate or college level of mathematical nous and therefore awaits collaboration with the expertise of technological applicability at the graduate levels and beyond to physically implement the technology indicated.
In using those boundary conditions, the endeavours of application- and experimental physics will be 'blessed'; because (as shall be realised in the details of the information published) to 'travel to the stars', particular boundary conditions must be satisfied to ensure successful application of mathematical formula to technological progress.

In short, to successfully 'tap' the energy one must 'ride' the lightmatrix in resonance with the parametric specifications of the construction of the lightmatrix. And it are those parametric specifications, which shall be published in the context of what the HD-Cosmic Lattice represents for the technology of a unified starhumanity, having graduated from its mode of separation characterising the old humanity before the nexus point of the warploop (from December 8th, 2004 to April 1st, 2012) and a number of 'warpdates' within this enveloping timewarp.

Introduction:

It is a well known scientific fact, that the phenomenon of magnetism is quantum reduced to electron spin.
A magnetic 'northpole' can be said to be a righthanded up-spin of an electron, the magnetic field rotating in this 'clockwise' direction about an 'northern outflow' current representing the electron moving as a current-element.
Corollarily, a magnetic 'southpole' depicts lefthanded down-spin of an electron, the magnetic field rotating 'counterclockwise' about an 'southern inflow' current of the moving electron.

In terms of the present state of establishment physics then, the phenomenon of magnetism reduces to a subset of the phenomenon of electricity in terms of the movement of electrons coupled to the latter's properties engaging those of Coulombic electric charges (electropoles), coupled to inertia, i.e. the mass carried by the electron.
The omni-physics states however the reverse, the electric current is a subset of the magnetic current, provided the origin and nature of this 'Coulombic charge' is appropriately understood in its coupling to inertia.
Then the origin of the electric charge is not fundamental, but the origin of the magnetocharge would be so.

This allows the well studied and analysed coupling of mass to electric charge to be reevaluated as being a consequence of a primordial state of uncoupling between those 'facts of observation and measurement'.

If magnetism can be reduced to quantum electron spin, then this fact alone suffices to define the magnetic phenomenon and without any necessity for the mass coupling.
Then if the massless (fermionic halfspin) electron selfstate represents a second generation emergence from a prior (bosonic full-integral spin) as a bifurcation; then this bosonic quantum integer-spin can be used to define the magnetic phenomenon as precursor for the emergence of fermionic quantum spin of the electric phenomenology.

This requires the existence of the magnetopole-bosonic full-spin quantum eigenstate prior to the existence of the electropole-fermionic half-spin quantum selfstate.
The elementary nature of the magnetopole can so be utilised to model the emergence of not only Coulombic charges, but also the emergence of inertia and of mass from a prior massless energetic eigenstate.

Massless (Goldstone) bosons exist in the form of photons, gravitons, phonons and the ancestors for the nuclear interaction carriers, which are known as massless gauge agents, giving physical reality to such labels as Higgs Boson, Weakon, Gluon, Neutrino, Axion, WIMP and RestmassPhoton.
(If a symmetry is broken explicitely, as well as spontaneously, then a Goldstone boson is said to be a pseudo-Goldstone boson and massinduction results via the explicity in status quo nomenclature).

Omni-science reconstructs just what this 'symmetry breaking' manifested in terms of superstring parameters and so naturally crystallises the massless Goldstein bosonic selfenergy as being causative for a later massinduction by an 'explicit' definition for the nature and origin of this 'mass' in the form of magnetopoles coupling AS inertia in a 'mapping' of magnetocharges onto the electrocharges.

This entails, that all mass is truly a lower dimensional form of magnetic electricity; highly densified or transformed in frequency parameters.
Massless photons are generated by the acceleration of Coulombic charges, say the oscillations of solar inertial protons undergoing nuclear fusion in the conversion of hydrogen into helium.
It is so the acceleration of the lower-dimensional electrocharge, coupled to inertia by first principles, which generates the massless photonic electromagnetic energy quantum (E=hf).

It is the acceleration of the higher-dimensional magnetocharge, not coupled to inertia by first principles, which generates the massive antiphotonic electromagnetic energy quantum (E=mc²).

There are many details to this, details which are elaborated in depth in other threads found on the linked website.
Here it suffices to state, that the nature of the magnetocurrent allows any mass to become transformed into a form of magnetic electricity coupled to electricity by the well known laws of electromagnetism, say Maxwell's Equations (with the magnetic monopole symmetry included).

As the flow of Coulombic charges induces a magnetic field (Laws of Faraday, Lenz, Ampere and Gauss) and conversely a changing magnetic field induces an electric field via electromotive force (Energy/Charge=Volt); the omniphysics of electromagnetomonoplism enables a 'higher-dimensional' physics to expand the spacetimematter restrictions of the metricated physics of Minkowski-Einstein, of Newtonian mechanics and the statutes of the present paradigm of the establishment.

Overview:

Old Mass Coordinates - de Broglie Deflaton-Scaling - Superposition of external magnetic fields onto internal electric fields - Natural Current Equivalent - ElectroMagnetoMonopolic Induction - (RestmassPhotonic Hybridisation; Frequency Modulation; Holofractalisation) - MagnetoElectroMonopolic Induction - Normal Current Equivalent - Superposition of external electric fields onto internal magnetic fields - de Broglie Inflaton-Scaling - New Mass Coordinates

1. Calculate the Phasevelocity (V_ph) of the matterwave for a constant sourcesink frequency (f_max=f*) parameter using V_ph=R.f* for a chosen displacement coordinate R.

2. Calculate the total inertia as a density function for the object to be matterwaved or 'teleported' in de Broglie parameters.

3. Convert this density function into the masseigen-frequency selfstate (f_min=1/f*) using the magnetopolic currentflow from the selfdual Planckian superstring transform.

4. Induce the Magnetopolic Natural Electricity by converting the massequivalent Normal Electricity via Biot-Savart {B=μ_oqv/4πr² ↔ Mω/2rc²}. This requires intersecting technologically generated magnetic fields to neutralise the selfinduced rotation of mass M from first principles. This then transforms the information of mass M into monopolic current I_M by inducing the Electric Field from the Magnetic Field by Electromagnetomonopolic Induction.

5. Calculate the superconductive Natural Electricity equivalent to the magnetocurrent using I_M=2ef=2eE/h in quantum holofractal terms in summation.

6. Convert the 'Natural Current' of the inertia into the frequency equivalent and apply the Newtonian Forcelaw extension as the applied EMF (Volt V=Energy/Charge).

7. Utilize the natural chirality coupling between the electromagnetic gauge agent (the so called virtual photon) to the RestmassPhoton (RMP as the gauge agent coupling fermionic matter to bosonic 'dark matter' by strongweak nuclear supersymmetry) to render the wormhole tunneling superconductive in the nonduality between wave and particle in modular duality between source-frequency and sink-frequency.

8. Utilize the holofractal nature of the HD-Lightmatrix to superquantize the attained energy eigenstate in terms of a density function, incorporating the volumar 12-dimensional brane characteristics of the RMP at the 14 TeV energy level at the RMP frequency of 3.4x10²⁷ Hertz or a wormhole perimeter of 8.9x10^-20 meters.

9. The hyperquantized volumar 'matterwaves' through interdimensional space as the microquantised RMP-volumar in the energy eigenstate of 'source-consciousness' and reintegrates the information- or data-integral after completion of the hyperdimensional lightpath.

10. Provided there exists an external electric field at the new coordinates, the encoding process for the (old mass-magnetopolic current-new mass) transformation will deencode under observation of the natural conservation laws regarding the encoded parameters of information, energy and momentums. The internal magnetic field will externalise in the remanifestation of the inertia at the new coordinates as that encodement.

​

The Cosmic Lattice aka the Light-Matrix of High Definition

Aye the Cosmic Lattice of the 83=Wisdom=Gnosis=Kryon=11.
With its 12-faced crystalline Dodecahedral spacetime vortices, also known as bilocated wormhole vents of the sourcesinks and the sinksources. When the 'Little Superstring' inflated in de Brogliean hyperacceleration; a scaling relationship between the encompassing metrically undefined, yet closed 11-dimensional membrane space and the expanding metric of the open 10-dimensional stringspace was implemented.

The scaled velocity of the de Brogliean phaseshift V_dB was supplementary to the lightpath X=cT of the group velocity V_g metricated and describes the intrinsic nature of all matter as higher dimensional matter waves.
{V_dB=wavelength/time=lambda.frequency=λ.f=(h/mV_g)(mc²/h )=c²/V_g >c for all V_g < c}

In the superstring cosmology of 10 dimensions and an expanding hyperbolically curved universe; the linespace of the asymptotic approach of the metrics so is restricted by the groupspeed and the lightspeed invariance given by the lightpath X=cT and with lightspeed c the upper bound for the observed velocities.

The superbrane cosmology of Matrix-M-Membrane-space in 11 dimensions of ellipsoidal-toroidal closure in a maximum modular scale of a Hubble-Radius R_max is however tachyonic in always exceeding lightspeed as its lower velocity bound.

The de Broglie phase velocity so becomes an universal constant in: {V_dB=R_max.f_max=4.793...x10⁵⁶ m/s}.
This is the (almost) instantaneous communication wavespeed of the HD-Lightmatrix and is also the 'speed of electromagnetomonopolic sourceenergy' also known as 'thought', connecting all of the dodecahedral spacetimequanta.

And crystallizes the scaled relationship between the Matrixspace and the Linespace as the function:
{R(n)=V_dB.T=V_dB/F(n)} and where the lightpath X=cT in the linespace becomes a scaled holofractal function of inverse time 1/T=F(n) in the matrixspace.
n is the dimensionless parameter defining linetime t as a function of the 11-dimensional metric encompassment as: {n=H_ot=ct/R_max for c=f_max.λ_min and for a nodal Hubble-Constant-Frequency defining the oscillation of the matrixspace in about 16.9 billion years by H_o=dn/dt}.
n also defines a dimensionless maximum-minimum metric displacement in Null-Time {n_o=λ_min/R_max=V_g/c}.

To transverse the 10-dimensional linespace in terms of the rootreduced 12-dimensional omnispace, that is the volumars of the metrications; any agglomeration of a spacetime quanta count N can be scaled to transduce the de Broglie phasespeed into a partition between displacement scale R(n) and a Matrix-Frequency F(n); provided the Cosmic Lattice can be 'tapped' or 'unbalanced' from its equilibrium Nullstate defined in the buildingblock of an individuated spacetime quantum.

The Newtonian momentum extension for the Matrixspace is given in the wave momentum {p=hf/c} of the matter waves coupled to the linear momentum {p=mv} and the energy momentum relation:

{m=m_o/Sqrt[1-(v/c)² ] by (mc²)² - (m_oc²)² = (pc)² }.
{F=d(mv)/dt=d([hfv/c²]/Sqrt[1-(v/c)²])/dt=(hf/c²).(dv/dt)/(Sqrt[1-(v/c)²])³ + (hv/c²).(df/dt)/Sqrt(1-(v/c)² );

defining: {F= F_a + F_alpha = m_o(dv/dt)/(Sqrt[1-(v/c)²])³ + (hv/c²)(df/dt)/Sqrt[1-(v/c)²]}

The linear forceterm F_a describes the relativistic particle properties of the interaction in terms of m_o, whilst the angular forceterm F_alpha is the 'vacuum' force of the matrixspace utilizing spaceawareness angular acceleration (df/dt) independent on the metric scale.

The Alpha-interaction of the matrix now becomes coupled to the linespace in the relativistic groupspeed V_g=n_oc=λ_minc/R_max as:

{(m_oV_g(df/dt)/f)/Sqrt(1-(V_g/c)² )=(m_oV_g(df/dt)/f)/Sqrt(1-n_o²)→m_oV_g(df/dt)/f)} in the limit for nulltime n_o=6.259...x10^-49 ~ 0 and defining time-instantenuity in sinkfrequency t_o=f_min=1/f_max=3.333...x10^-31 seconds* as the modular dual for sourcefrequency f_max=3x10³⁰ Hz*.

All matter thus is quantized in the formulation through the masseigen frequency f_min of the instanton:

{Energy E=hf=mc²
E=hf iff m_o=0 in E² + E_o² = (pc)²
E=mc² iff f_o=f_min in E² + E_o² = (pc)²}

A mass agglomeration m_o, in matrixspace and of momentum m_oV_g , so becomes subject to the quantum angular acceleration awareness differential (df/dt) acting on a linear time segment 1/f=t.

The awareness differential for spacial volumar selfconsciousness is maximised in the permutation entropy counter (f_max)²=9x10⁶⁰ and minimised in the modular dual reciprocal of the sourcesink in the sinksource 1/(f_max)² as the inertial maximum of maximum 'free space' impedance.

The matrix M-space Alpha-Interaction so replaces the momentum change of the Newtonian F=ma=m(dv/dt)=dp/dt
by a frequency scale change F=mv(df/dt)t=p(df/dt)t.

The de Brogliean phase velocity of inflation so renders the inflaton Hubble Event Horizon R_max=c/H_o=λ_min/n_o as the upper bound for modulated scales of linear displacement.

The demetricated parametrisations for the generalised Schwarzschild solution for the HD Lightmatrix are:

{Displacement-Curvature: R(n)=R_max[n/(n+1)] and for dn/dt=H_o

Velocity-Derivative: V(n,t)=dR/dt=(dR(n)/dn)(dn/dt)=c/[n+1]²

Acceleration-Derivative: A(n,t)=d²R/dt²=(dV(n,t)/dn)(dn/dt)=-2cH_o/[n+1]³}

The M-space containing metric is defined in the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE (ZPE) of the minimum metric configuration as Planckian Harmonic Oscillator:

{E_o= ½hf_max=½m_maxc²=G_om_maxM/R(n_o) for R(n_o)=2G_oM/c²

with R(n_o)=R_max[n_o/(n_o+1)] > λ_min=ct_o as the minimised lightpath X=cT and maximised in the de Broglie event horizon R(n→∞)=R_max (asymptotically approached in infinite linearised time t).

The total inertial mass of the universe is then M_total =ρ_critical.V_critical=for a critical density for (spherical 3D)closure (inclusive the gravitational, but noninertial matrix energy classified as dark or hidden) of:

{ρ_critical= 3M_total/4πR_max³=3R_maxc²/8πG_oR_max³=3H_o²/8πG_o}.

The critical de Broglien phase acceleration A_dB=R_max.f_max² of the inflaton-instanton of metric spacetime then is superposed onto a 'dark energy' cosmological boundary acceleration given in the gravitational curvature potential of the initial conditions and for a inertial baryon mass seedling M_o as:

{A(n_o) =G_oM_o/λ_min² =(M_o/2M_total)A_dB=(deceleration parameter q_o)(matterwave hyperacceleration)}.

The deceleration parameter q_o also defines a quasar wall cosmological redshift boundary specifying a galactic supercluster gravitationally interaction scale at z=7.477 for a Sarkar-Curvature of R_Sarkar =2G_oM_o/c² of about 236.5 million lightyears in q_o.R_max=72.4 Mpc.

Higher cosmological redshifts define a cosmogony of ylemic (dineutron) protostar epoch, where the thermodynamic Planck Black Body radiator expansion specified a temperature background which gave the gravitational potential of crystallising VPE-vents as a function of this temperature and quantum parameters independenyt on the inertia equivalents of subsequent Chandrasekhar neutron stars of 3x10³⁰ kg.

This concludes some detailed excursions into the Cosmic Lattice aka the High Definition Lightmatrix of the universal cosmogenesis.
This message is part of the High Definition Lightmatrix Definition post and is reproduced in connectivity with appropriate mathematical symbol representation on the linked website.

Shiloh, October 3rd, 2013

Last edited by shiloh on Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:41 pm; edited 2 times in total

 

shiloh


shiloh
Posts: 722
Join date: 2011-03-16
Age: 57
Location: Akbar Ra

• Post n°39

shiloh on Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:21 pm

shiloh wrote:

​

SUSAN - Posted Dec 1st 2010

Have Physicists Found Echoes From Before the Big Bang?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...icists-found-echoes-from-before-the-big-bang/
.

​

The Big Bang was not the beginning, Roger Penrose believes.

The eminent Oxford physicist has long advocated the wild idea of “conformal cyclic cosmology,” a cyclical universe without beginning or end in which the Big Bang 13.75 billion years ago was simply one of many. This month, Penrose pushed his idea further: His team says it has detected a pattern in the cosmic microwave background—radiation left over from just after the Big Bang—that represents the echo of events that occurred before the Big Bang itself.

Penrose examined the data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), the mission that just completed nine years of surveying the cosmic microwave background across the sky. His study points to concentric circular patterns in the WMAP data where he says he found something surprising:

The circular features are regions where tiny temperature variations in the otherwise uniform microwave background are smaller than average. Those features, Penrose said, cannot be explained by the highly successful inflation theory, which posits that the infant cosmos underwent an enormous growth spurt, ballooning from something on the scale of an atom to the size of a grapefruit during the universe’s first tiny fraction of a second.
Inflation would either erase such patterns or could not easily generate them. [Science News]
By Penrose’s thinking, those circles are the calling cards of something big that happened in the universe before our Big Bang and reverberated after it. Like the birth and death of previous universes.

From calculations made by Penrose, he believes that as each universe evolved, the catastrophic collisions between supermassive black holes (the black hole behemoths living in the centers of galaxies) would have generated gravitational waves within that universe’s lifetime.
When the next universe exploded into being, these gravitational waves were converted into energy, ensuring their “fingerprint” bled through to the next universe.
The pulse of energy caused by the transfer of gravitational waves from one universe to the next would have caused a kick to the distribution of dark matter, creating uniform, spherical patterns in the current universe. [Discovery News]
So what are we to make of this? I put it to cosmologist Paul Davies, who says the question rests with inflation.

“Penrose was always been a doubter of inflation,” Davies says. “It’s against the fashion of the moment, but that’s fine. (And) if you abandon inflation, what happened before the Big Bang could leave an echo.”
That’s because inflation would smooth out that echo. (Another possibility, he says, is idea of “incomplete inflation,” in which inflation could have existed but not been thorough enough to smooth out all echoes.
That theory wouldn’t require abandoning inflation to accommodate an echo in the microwave background.)
However, Davies says, even if the finding is correct, this explanation for it —a black hole smash-up from before the Big Bang leaving its fingerprint after the Big Bang —isn’t the only possibility. “People have been looking for concentric rings in the cosmic microwave background for a while,” he says, because such a finding could support several different ideas.
One of those alternate explanations plays on the idea of our universe being a “bubble” created by inflation; if two bubbles collided, he says, the result could leave a cosmic microwave echo.
Lastly, he says, the source of the study makes it a tad suspect.
“You’d expect people at the sharp end of the data to make an announcement like this.
You wouldn’t expect a mathematician.” So I asked Charles Barrett, who was the lead investigator of WMAP, and in his reply email he too expressed skepticism:
“Unfortunately, the paper does not provide the necessary detail on how they performed their calculations.
I am concerned that the noise properties and pattern of the WMAP instrumental sky sampling were not properly taken into account in their analysis.
If these are not handled correctly then spurious results are likely. In my opinion, the paper should have specified the data analysis steps in detail, but it did not.”

Penrose counters that he looked at not only WMAP but also data from a second mission, BOOMERang, which confirmed the pattern he saw.
At the moment, then, these huge claims about the nature of the universe are bogged down in competing calculations and critiques of calculations. The future of this question could lie with the Planck mission by the European Space Agency, which is presently mapping the cosmic microwave background in greater detail than WMAP.
In the meantime, we get to wonder. Says physicist Shaun Cole:
“It’s a revolutionary theory and here there appears to be some data that supports it.
In the standard Big Bang model, there’s nothing cyclic; it has a beginning and it has no end.
The philosophical question that’s sensible to ask is ‘what came before the Big Bang?’; and what they’re striving for here is to do away with that ‘there’s nothing before’ answer by making it cyclical.” [BBC News]


Shiloh - Posted Dec 2nd 2010

Roger Penrose, whose work I often use in Quantum Relativity; is basically on the right path of reconstructing the cosmogenesis.
However the cyclic universe is built on its own protoversal seed and the 'Big Crunches' are electromagnetic and not inertial.

This means, that there will be no gravitational contraction in a shrinking of the protoverse; but the electromagnetic lightpath becomes multidimensional and multivalued. One can so model this on a cyclic electromagnetic cosmology with a 'Hubble heartbeat' of a semibeat of so 16.9 Billion years. This also allows a cosmogenetic Black Hole-White Hole evolution, which resets the wormhole singularity every 4 trillion years or so to eschew any theorized 'heat death' of the universe, due to the stellar generations 'running out' of their nuclear fuel of the nucleosynthesis of the primordial elements, based on hydrogen, helium and lithium.

Indeed, the Inflation PRECEDED the Big Bang and this is the simple solution for the 'inflation paradoxes' as some might term it.

The WMAP data in the picture in this post actually is descriptive for the wavequark model in Quantum Relativity with an inner gluonic (anti)neutrino kernel or core, an Inner Mesonic (down quark) Ring and an Outer Leptonic (strange quark) Ring.

It is just the 'New Standard Model' of Unitary Symmetry for the quarkian waves as "matter waves". The smallest quantum as microcosmic reality written in the galactic sky of the macrocosm.


Discover Interview: Roger Penrose Says Physics Is Wrong, From String Theory to Quantum Mechanics
One of the greatest thinkers in physics says the human brain—and the universe itself—must function according to some theory we haven't yet discovered.

By Susan Kruglinski, Oliver Chanarin|Tuesday, October 06, 2009



http://discovermagazine.com/2009/se...ics-is-wrong-string-theory-quantum-mechanics/


Roger Penrose could easily be excused for having a big ego. A theorist whose name will be forever linked with such giants as Hawking and Einstein, Penrose has made fundamental contributions to physics, mathematics, and geometry. He reinterpreted general relativity to prove that black holes can form from dying stars. He invented twistor theory—a novel way to look at the structure of space-time—and so led us to a deeper understanding of the nature of gravity. He discovered a remarkable family of geometric forms that came to be known as Penrose tiles. He even moonlighted as a brain researcher, coming up with a provocative theory that consciousness arises from quantum-mechanical processes. And he wrote a series of incredibly readable, best-selling science books to boot.

And yet the 78-year-old Penrose—now an emeritus professor at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford—seems to live the humble life of a researcher just getting started in his career. His small office is cramped with the belongings of the six other professors with whom he shares it, and at the end of the day you might find him rushing off to pick up his 9-year-old son from school. With the curiosity of a man still trying to make a name for himself, he cranks away on fundamental, wide-ranging questions: How did the universe begin? Are there higher dimensions of space and time? Does the current front-running theory in theoretical physics, string theory, actually make sense?
Because he has lived a lifetime of complicated calculations, though, Penrose has quite a bit more perspective than the average starting scientist. To get to the bottom of it all, he insists, physicists must force themselves to grapple with the greatest riddle of them all: the relationship between the rules that govern fundamental particles and the rules that govern the big things—like us—that those particles make up. In his powwow with DISCOVER contributing editor Susan Kruglinksi, Penrose did not flinch from questioning the central tenets of modern physics, including string theory and quantum mechanics. Physicists will never come to grips with the grand theories of the universe, Penrose holds, until they see past the blinding distractions of today’s half-baked theories to the deepest layer of the reality in which we live.


You come from a colorful family of overachievers, don’t you?
My older brother is a distinguished theoretical physicist, a fellow of the Royal Society. My younger brother ended up the British chess champion 10 times, a record. My father came from a Quaker family. His father was a professional artist who did portraits—very traditional, a lot of religious subjects. The family was very strict. I don’t think we were even allowed to read novels, certainly not on Sundays. My father was one of four brothers, all of whom were very good artists. One of them became well known in the art world, Sir Roland. He was cofounder of the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London. My father himself was a human geneticist who was recognized for demonstrating that older mothers tend to get more Down syndrome children, but he had lots of scientific interests.


How did your father influence your thinking?
The important thing about my father was that there wasn’t any boundary between his work and what he did for fun. That rubbed off on me. He would make puzzles and toys for his children and grandchildren. He used to have a little shed out back where he cut things from wood with his little pedal saw. I remember he once made a slide rule with about 12 different slides, with various characters that we could combine in complicated ways. Later in his life he spent a lot of time making wooden models that reproduced themselves—what people now refer to as artificial life. These were simple devices that, when linked together, would cause other bits to link together in the same way. He sat in his woodshed and cut these things out of wood in great, huge numbers.


So I assume your father helped spark your discovery of Penrose tiles, repeating shapes that fit together to form a solid surface with pentagonal symmetry.
It was silly in a way. I remember asking him—I was around 9 years old—about whether you could fit regular hexagons together and make it round like a sphere. And he said, “No, no, you can’t do that, but you can do it with pentagons,” which was a surprise to me. He showed me how to make polyhedra, and so I got started on that.


Are Penrose tiles useful or just beautiful?
My interest in the tiles has to do with the idea of a universe controlled by very simple forces, even though we see complications all over the place. The tilings follow conventional rules to make complicated patterns. It was an attempt to see how the complicated could be satisfied by very simple rules that reflect what we see in the world.


The artist M. C. Escher was influenced by your geometric inventions. What was the story there?
In my second year as a graduate student at Cambridge, I attended the International Congress of Mathematicians in Amsterdam. I remember seeing one of the lecturers there I knew quite well, and he had this catalog. On the front of it was the Escher picture Day and Night, the one with birds going in opposite directions. The scenery is nighttime on one side and daytime on the other. I remember being intrigued by this, and I asked him where he got it. He said, “Oh, well, there’s an exhibition you might be interested in of some artist called Escher.” So I went and was very taken by these very weird and wonderful things that I’d never seen anything like. I decided to try and draw some impossible scenes myself and came up with this thing that’s referred to as a tri-bar. It’s a triangle that looks like a three-dimensional object, but actually it’s impossible for it to be three-dimensional. I showed it to my father and he worked out some impossible buildings and things. Then we published an article in the British Journal of Psychology on this stuff and acknowledged Escher.


Escher saw the article and was inspired by it?
He used two things from the article. One was the tri-bar, used in his lithograph called Waterfall. Another was the impossible staircase, which my father had worked on and designed. Escher used it in Ascending and Descending, with monks going round and round the stairs. I met Escher once, and I gave him some tiles that will make a repeating pattern, but not until you’ve got 12 of them fitted together. He did this, and then he wrote to me and asked me how it was done—what was it based on? So I showed him a kind of bird shape that did this, and he incorporated it into what I believe is the last picture he ever produced, called Ghosts.

Is it true that you were bad at math as a kid?
I was unbelievably slow. I lived in Canada for a while, for about six years, during the war. When I was 8, sitting in class, we had to do this mental arithmetic very fast, or what seemed to me very fast. I always got lost. And the teacher, who didn’t like me very much, moved me down a class. There was one rather insightful teacher who decided, after I’d done so badly on these tests, that he would have timeless tests. You could just take as long as you’d like. We all had the same test. I was allowed to take the entire next period to continue, which was a play period. Everyone was always out and enjoying themselves, and I was struggling away to do these tests. And even then sometimes it would stretch into the period beyond that. So I was at least twice as slow as anybody else. Eventually I would do very well. You see, if I could do it that way, I would get very high marks.

​

You have called the real-world implications of quantum physics nonsensical. What is your objection?
Quantum mechanics is an incredible theory that explains all sorts of things that couldn’t be explained before, starting with the stability of atoms. But when you accept the weirdness of quantum mechanics [in the macro world], you have to give up the idea of space-time as we know it from Einstein. The greatest weirdness here is that it doesn’t make sense. If you follow the rules, you come up with something that just isn’t right.


In quantum mechanics an object can exist in many states at once, which sounds crazy. The quantum description of the world seems completely contrary to the world as we experience it.
It doesn’t make any sense, and there is a simple reason. You see, the mathematics of quantum mechanics has two parts to it. One is the evolution of a quantum system, which is described extremely precisely and accurately by the Schrödinger equation. That equation tells you this: If you know what the state of the system is now, you can calculate what it will be doing 10 minutes from now. However, there is the second part of quantum mechanics—the thing that happens when you want to make a measurement. Instead of getting a single answer, you use the equation to work out the probabilities of certain outcomes. The results don’t say, “This is what the world is doing.” Instead, they just describe the probability of its doing any one thing. The equation should describe the world in a completely deterministic way, but it doesn’t.


Erwin Schrödinger, who created that equation, was considered a genius. Surely he appreciated that conflict.
Schrödinger was as aware of this as anybody. He talks about his hypothetical cat and says, more or less, “Okay, if you believe what my equation says, you must believe that this cat is dead and alive at the same time.” He says, “That’s obviously nonsense, because it’s not like that. Therefore, my equation can’t be right for a cat. So there must be some other factor involved.”


So Schrödinger himself never believed that the cat analogy reflected the nature of reality?
Oh yes, I think he was pointing this out. I mean, look at three of the biggest figures in quantum mechanics, Schrödinger, Einstein, and Paul Dirac. They were all quantum skeptics in a sense. Dirac is the one whom people find most surprising, because he set up the whole foundation, the general framework of quantum mechanics. People think of him as this hard-liner, but he was very cautious in what he said. When he was asked, “What’s the answer to the measurement problem?” his response was, “Quantum mechanics is a provisional theory. Why should I look for an answer in quantum mechanics?” He didn’t believe that it was true. But he didn’t say this out loud much.


Yet the analogy of Schrödinger’s cat is always presented as a strange reality that we have to accept. Doesn’t the concept drive many of today’s ideas about theoretical physics?
That’s right. People don’t want to change the Schrödinger equation, leading them to what’s called the “many worlds” interpretation of quantum mechanics.


That interpretation says that all probabilities are playing out somewhere in parallel universes?
It says OK, the cat is somehow alive and dead at the same time. To look at that cat, you must become a superposition [two states existing at the same time] of you seeing the live cat and you seeing the dead cat. Of course, we don’t seem to experience that, so the physicists have to say, well, somehow your consciousness takes one route or the other route without your knowing it. You’re led to a completely crazy point of view. You’re led into this “many worlds” stuff, which has no relationship to what we actually perceive.


The idea of parallel universes—many worlds—is a very human-centered idea, as if everything has to be understood from the perspective of what we can detect with our five senses.
The trouble is, what can you do with it? Nothing. You want a physical theory that describes the world that we see around us. That’s what physics has always been: Explain what the world that we see does, and why or how it does it. Many worlds quantum mechanics doesn’t do that. Either you accept it and try to make sense of it, which is what a lot of people do, or, like me, you say no—that’s beyond the limits of what quantum mechanics can tell us. Which is, surprisingly, a very uncommon position to take. My own view is that quantum mechanics is not exactly right, and I think there’s a lot of evidence for that. It’s just not direct experimental evidence within the scope of current experiments.


In general, the ideas in theoretical physics seem increasingly fantastical. Take string theory. All that talk about 11 dimensions or our universe’s existing on a giant membrane seems surreal.
You’re absolutely right. And in a certain sense, I blame quantum mechanics, because people say, “Well, quantum mechanics is so nonintuitive; if you believe that, you can believe anything that’s nonintuitive.” But, you see, quantum mechanics has a lot of experimental support, so you’ve got to go along with a lot of it. Whereas string theory has no experimental support.


I understand you are setting out this critique of quantum mechanics in your new book.
The book is called Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe. Each of those words stands for a major theoretical physics idea. The fashion is string theory; the fantasy has to do with various cosmological schemes, mainly inflationary cosmology [which suggests that the universe inflated exponentially within a small fraction of a second after the Big Bang]. Big fish, those things are. It’s almost sacrilegious to attack them. And the other one, even more sacrilegious, is quantum mechanics at all levels—so that’s the faith. People somehow got the view that you really can’t question it.


A few years ago you suggested that gravity is what separates the classical world from the quantum one. Are there enough people out there putting quantum mechanics to this kind of test?
No, although it’s sort of encouraging that there are people working on it at all. It used to be thought of as a sort of crackpot, fringe activity that people could do when they were old and retired. Well, I am old and retired! But it’s not regarded as a central, as a mainstream activity, which is a shame.


After Newton, and again after Einstein, the way people thought about the world shifted. When the puzzle of quantum mechanics is solved, will there be another revolution in thinking?
It’s hard to make predictions. Ernest Rutherford said his model of the atom [which led to nuclear physics and the atomic bomb] would never be of any use. But yes, I would be pretty sure that it will have a huge influence. There are things like how quantum mechanics could be used in biology. It will eventually make a huge difference, probably in all sorts of unimaginable ways.


In your book The Emperor’s New Mind, you posited that consciousness emerges from quantum physical actions within the cells of the brain. Two decades later, do you stand by that?
In my view the conscious brain does not act according to classical physics. It doesn’t even act according to conventional quantum mechanics. It acts according to a theory we don’t yet have. This is being a bit big-headed, but I think it’s a little bit like William Harvey’s discovery of the circulation of blood. He worked out that it had to circulate, but the veins and arteries just peter out, so how could the blood get through from one to the other? And he said, “Well, it must be tiny little tubes there, and we can’t see them, but they must be there.” Nobody believed it for some time. So I’m still hoping to find something like that—some structure that preserves coherence, because I believe it ought to be there.


When physicists finally understand the core of quantum physics, what do you think the theory will look like?
I think it will be beautiful.

[4:41:49 AM-Friday, October 4th, 2013 +10UCT]
[2:52:23 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[2:53:06 AM] Shiloh: yes and our job is done, so we are getting more 'normal' and irritated with all things including our own human stuff
[2:53:43 AM] Shiloh: In the timewarp, we were banned from Camelot around April 6th, 2011
[2:54:02 AM] Shiloh: This is October 1st, 2013
[2:54:29 AM] Shiloh: So we feeling the 'war' with them for the next month or so now
[2:54:38 AM] Sirius 17: oh i see
[2:55:04 AM] Shiloh: November 1st 2013 will be like March 5th, 2011
[2:55:10 AM] Sirius 17: yes too much time to feel and think about our own mortality
[2:55:58 AM] Shiloh: And so the Fukushima tsunami is mapping in the mirror of October 27th or so
[2:56:24 AM] Shiloh: We went there around February 22nd or so
[2:56:42 AM] Shiloh: This becomes around November 12th
[2:56:44 AM] Sirius 17: i kept thinking if the Logos wants me dead it should do it quicker lol, then of course i felt bad thinking this way and that i am not going to die, well not the way i think i guess
[2:56:53 AM] Sirius 17: hmmm wow that is interesting
[2:57:11 AM] Shiloh: I dont know; but I think by age 60 there must be some change in me
[2:57:24 AM] Shiloh: I dont see myself becoming an old man
[2:57:42 AM] Shiloh: Yes this Ison thing is here now
[2:57:47 AM] Sirius 17: yes
[2:58:00 AM] Sirius 17: and it is from outside our solar system
[2:58:12 AM] Sirius 17: i really think its means 'invasion' time
[2:58:20 AM] Shiloh: In many forms
[2:58:23 AM] Sirius 17: yes
[2:58:34 AM] Shiloh: Try to watch those videos with my last post
[2:58:49 AM] Sirius 17: i almost finished the nabs one about dulce
[2:58:56 AM] Shiloh: It drags on
[2:59:10 AM] Shiloh: Watch the shorter ones with Kaku and Hawking
[2:59:15 AM] Sirius 17: and while it did have some syncro it was pretty much BS of the highest order at about the half way point
[2:59:22 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[2:59:49 AM] Sirius 17: but i have seen clips and interviews about the same subject and years ago i did read the dulce papers
[2:59:59 AM] Sirius 17: but this reminds me of Bill's Serpo project
[3:00:09 AM] Sirius 17: they just make this shit up at will to make money
[3:00:22 AM] Sirius 17: sell books, create controversy you know
[3:00:32 AM] Sirius 17: spinning it all on half truths and rumors
[3:00:44 AM] Shiloh: Yes there is a big component of this and Nabsers like Carol cant see it; blaming Dacos instead
[3:00:48 AM] Sirius 17: like you said the human imagination is so powerful at weaving incredible stories
[3:01:30 AM] Shiloh: See the videos of the galaxies merging?
[3:01:33 AM] Sirius 17: yes well like we said before, she cannot get past the Dragon symbol and archetype
[3:01:40 AM] Shiloh: Idiotic
[3:01:48 AM] Shiloh: Proud and vain actually
[3:02:05 AM] Sirius 17: to her the mere mention of Draco conjures images of a horney horned Devil in her mind lol, forked tongue and all
[3:02:26 AM] Shiloh: http://www.themistsofavalon.net/t6759p30-the-factuals-versus-the-nabs
[3:02:29 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[3:02:51 AM] Shiloh: Mindfuc11ed most of the chicks there
[3:03:04 AM] Shiloh: This Jenetta is a nabser too
[3:03:08 AM] Shiloh: I like Sanicle though
[3:03:54 AM] Sirius 17: oh i like this milky way and andromeda merger
[3:04:15 AM] Sirius 17: looks like the triangulum galaxy comes into play too
[3:04:48 AM] Sirius 17: yeah i like Sanicle too, she seems at least open to logical discourse somewhat
[3:06:10 AM] Shiloh: Yes she is the sort of Nabs which i can accomodate as not being Nabs
[3:09:37 AM] Sirius 17: oh yeah the first video is better, explains the time factor
[3:09:51 AM] Shiloh: I found 3 of them
[3:10:02 AM] Sirius 17: lol billions and billions of years...."carl sagan's voice"
[3:10:04 AM] Shiloh: All relevant to my deeper exposition following
[3:10:37 AM] Shiloh: It includes the ET factor see
[3:10:44 AM] Shiloh: Kaku in the 3rd
[3:10:56 AM] Sirius 17: yes the eternal dance...you romantic devil
[3:11:06 AM] Shiloh: Well Abba and Baab
[3:11:12 AM] Shiloh: One day I will dance like that again
[3:11:26 AM] Sirius 17: yes you will
[3:11:41 AM] Shiloh: Young virile bodies for us dear
[3:11:56 AM] Shiloh: I am still virile lol but cant move like that
[3:12:21 AM] Shiloh: Amazing though, that noone appreciates those posts
[3:12:43 AM] Shiloh: Reading them must surely indicate it is well informed
[3:12:58 AM] Shiloh: So science lover-freak Carol has no words for it
[3:13:18 AM] Shiloh: Showing her fakeness in regards to science
[3:13:25 AM] Sirius 17: i know it is mind blowing that no one at least comments and says, wow Shiloh, this must of taken you quite some time and nice graphics ect ect...
[3:13:36 AM] Sirius 17: something
[3:13:44 AM] Sirius 17: no they fuc11ing hate it apparently
[3:13:51 AM] Shiloh: They are 'afraid' lol very afraid of what it means for them should it be true
[3:14:02 AM] Sirius 17: yes likely
[3:14:07 AM] Shiloh: I know they are
[3:14:26 AM] Shiloh: Why idiot 44 still tries to bring dragons into her BS
[3:14:52 AM] Sirius 17: she misses us lol
[3:14:58 AM] Sirius 17: can't get us out of her head
[3:15:46 AM] Shiloh: I dont know
[3:15:58 AM] Shiloh: i dont miss her babble though
[3:16:10 AM] Sirius 17: me neither
[3:16:51 AM] Sirius 17: but that last post where she mentions us as 'copy cats' was so incoherent that i just shook my head and wondered wtf is going on inside her brain
[3:17:35 AM] Sirius 17:
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uabNtlLfYyU#t=85[3:17:54
AM] Sirius 17: time marker 1:58 or so, curiosity killed the cats
[3:18:11 AM] Sirius 17: yes where the hell is the curiousity of the moabytes
[3:18:19 AM] Sirius 17: of the why and how
[3:18:56 AM] Shiloh: Lol
[3:19:20 AM] Shiloh: If it is above their head, like real science, they dismiss it as conspiracies
[3:20:02 AM] Shiloh: Other people labeled us as copycats and plagiarisers of others works remember?
[3:20:43 AM] Shiloh: As other people know better than Thuban, DD and Carol and lot then use their 'critical thinking' to make their 'choices'
[3:20:48 AM] Sirius 17: time marker 3.36...there it is, the solution is outside of time and space, so simple yet i doubt any of them even watched these videos
[3:20:59 AM] Sirius 17: yes i know, parrots we are
[3:21:28 AM] Sirius 17: and all your science papers that YOU wrote must be copied from elsewhere....where i wonder lol
[3:21:47 AM] Shiloh: Yes how often did we say space and time are required for physicality
[3:21:57 AM] Sirius 17: god forbid you actually wrote something on your own Tony....its unthinkable
[3:22:20 AM] Shiloh: Oh yes, I am too stupid to create anything by myself
[3:22:47 AM] Shiloh: So I am deceiving people as evil draco in stealing other human's ideas
[3:22:59 AM] Shiloh: Lawlessline said this or such
[3:23:42 AM] Shiloh: But you see in all 3 videos that at the end they have no answers
[3:23:51 AM] Shiloh: So I gave the answers
[3:23:56 AM] Sirius 17: yes
[3:24:16 AM] Shiloh: For our testimony not for human judgements on it
[3:24:40 AM] Shiloh: This is the last thing to do imo
[3:24:58 AM] Shiloh: Just to put it there for their bebafflements and ignorance
[3:25:19 AM] Shiloh: This Penrose pic is nice
[3:25:34 AM] Shiloh: It is just the New Standard Model of the quarkian waves
[3:25:38 AM] Shiloh: Matter waves
[3:26:04 AM] Shiloh: The smallest quantum written in the galactic sky
[3:26:58 AM] Sirius 17:
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wHHz4mB9GKY#t=75

[3:27:01 AM] Sirius 17: 1:15 lol
[3:27:20 AM] Sirius 17: relativity is perfectly intelligible to anyone who is able to think
[3:29:47 AM] Shiloh: Not many apparently
[3:31:57 AM] Sirius 17: i am watching the kaku video now
[3:32:31 AM] Shiloh: Yes he mentions the ET civilisations as a consequence of evolution
[3:43:30 AM] Sirius 17: hahaha Bambie vs Godzilla
[3:43:36 AM] Sirius 17: oh dear
[3:49:34 AM] Sirius 17: god kaku is so smart, i really like this guy and his rationality
[3:50:38 AM] Shiloh: He is ok yes
[3:50:45 AM] Shiloh: I added Penrose to the message
[3:50:50 AM] Shiloh: Discover Interview: Roger Penrose Says Physics Is Wrong, From String Theory to Quantum Mechanics
One of the greatest thinkers in physics says the human brain—and the universe itself—must function according to some theory we haven't yet discovered.

By Susan Kruglinski, Oliver Chanarin|Tuesday, October 06, 2009


http://discovermagazine.com/2009/se...ics-is-wrong-string-theory-quantum-mechanics/
For further details, a consultation of the Thuban archives on http://cosmosdawn.com is suggested.
[3:51:30 AM] Sirius 17: yes i have not gotten to that part yet, i am on the last kaku video
[3:52:02 AM] Sirius 17: but Michio is right, we are on the verge of either taking off onto a new civilization or destroying ourselves
[3:52:14 AM] Sirius 17: precarious times to witness
[3:54:22 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[3:54:30 AM] Shiloh: This is it
[3:54:43 AM] Shiloh: Why our 'death' is pointless in the cosmic sense
[4:15:13 AM] Sirius 17: humm yes i like this penrose article
[4:16:03 AM] Shiloh: I am posting it
[4:30:21 AM] Shiloh: Done
[4:30:37 AM] Shiloh: Of course he is wrong about strings as we understand them
[4:30:42 AM] Sirius 17:
1. Calculate the Phasevelocity (Vph) of the matterwave for a constant sourcesink frequency (fmax=f*) parameter using Vph=R.f* for a chosen displacement coordinate R.

2. Calculate the total inertia as a density function for the object to be matterwaved or 'teleported' in de Broglie parameters.

3. Convert this density function into the masseigen-frequency selfstate (fmin=1/f*) using the magnetopolic currentflow from the selfdual Planckian superstring transform.

[4:30:55 AM] Shiloh: But he is right about them in terms of parallel universe crapola
[4:31:02 AM] Sirius 17: lol Tony this is way too deep for anyone to understand your talking first principles
[4:31:18 AM] Shiloh: Yes it is not for humans
[4:31:27 AM] Sirius 17: i didn't paste all the 'instructions' here but its funny to me
[4:31:38 AM] Shiloh: And I cant do those calculations in the required detail either
[4:32:02 AM] Sirius 17: well the ETs can
[4:32:18 AM] Shiloh: But the new physics can use this somewhat in the form of summation integrals like in the consciousness paper
[4:32:36 AM] Sirius 17: yeah once they can 'see' it
[4:32:52 AM] Sirius 17: problem is they have to get out of the current paradigm limitations to be able to see it
[4:33:01 AM] Sirius 17: they are so very much box thinkers
[4:33:04 AM] Shiloh: Those 10 instructions are however as you said the basic principles and those I can explain as I did in the rest of the message
[4:33:47 AM] Shiloh: It is the micro-macro quantization and this is what the resurrection physics is
[4:34:09 AM] Shiloh: The intro in bold is the general rundown
[4:34:30 AM] Shiloh: Mass to magnetics to electricity then reversed
[4:34:37 AM] Sirius 17: yeah i figured this, transformation physics yes
[4:34:54 AM] Shiloh: But I put this there for Carol and co to see how limited they are
[4:35:00 AM] Sirius 17: how to trap the hubble heart beat within the finitum
[4:35:02 AM] Shiloh: They always ask for details see?
[4:35:27 AM] Shiloh: So there are some they wont get from the quacks like MacCanney
[4:35:33 AM] Shiloh: Or Keshe etc
[4:36:00 AM] Sirius 17: it just kills me, if they only read through this stuff a little slowly and methodically they could see how beautiful it is
[4:36:17 AM] Sirius 17: or maybe i am dreaming
[4:36:26 AM] Shiloh: No it is all selfconsistent
[4:36:42 AM] Shiloh: The Legacy post shows this and tries to prove it
[4:36:44 AM] Sirius 17: but really that is all i did is read it slowly, sometimes over and over until i could see it
[4:37:06 AM] Sirius 17: of course we have had hours of discussion and so on
[4:37:37 AM] Sirius 17: i don't know , it seems that anyone interested even slightly could see this
[4:37:49 AM] Shiloh: Well imo you are the only person, who can comment on the overviews
[4:37:59 AM] Shiloh: They are fakes
[4:38:08 AM] Shiloh: Their Nabs science is pure fake
[4:38:10 AM] Sirius 17: i am still not entirely sure how it is i understand some things
[4:38:31 AM] Shiloh: Floyd is no fake, but he has no science education to understand it
[4:38:53 AM] Sirius 17: no and some understanding of the sciences is required
[4:39:11 AM] Shiloh: I feel Carol is rather annoyed with those posts
[4:39:17 AM] Shiloh: Unsettling
[4:39:29 AM] Sirius 17: you cannot dismiss for example what physics already knows, such as relativity, quantum theory ect, it all goes together with the omni science
[4:39:53 AM] Sirius 17: because it requires deep thought to understand it
[4:39:57 AM] Shiloh: Because all her conspiracy science crap is right there in a novel form, which would even surprise the conspirators
[4:39:59 AM] Sirius 17: and to learn a new language
[4:40:14 AM] Sirius 17: they are not familar with the language of science, let alone omni-science
[4:40:30 AM] Sirius 17: its work
[4:40:40 AM] Sirius 17: takes effort
[4:40:40 AM] Shiloh: Can you see Jenetta or Burgundia read science words and not to call Devakas?
[4:40:51 AM] Sirius 17: oh hell no
[4:41:00 AM] Shiloh: Easier to call us names and evil dragons
[4:41:16 AM] Shiloh: Let them sit in their judgement seats
[4:41:21 AM] Sirius 17: yes and this is a microscopic example of the world, far easier to point fingers then to solve problems
[4:41:25 AM] Shiloh: But Carol pretends to like science
[4:41:33 AM] Sirius 17: yes as does Brook
[4:41:35 AM] Shiloh: This is the hypocrisy
[4:41:39 AM] Shiloh: Yes
[4:41:42 AM] Shiloh: They run
[4:41:49 AM] Sirius 17: but when shi20 gets too heavy even for her she goes total NABS
[4:42:17 AM] Sirius 17: i like how Penrose thinks
[4:42:26 AM] Sirius 17: he is a pragmatic fellow
[4:42:39 AM] Sirius 17: interesting his history that he struggled with math
[4:42:47 AM] Shiloh: It is a Nabs forum and only differs from Ryan and Cassidy in having a dislike for the formers and latters
[4:42:52 AM] Shiloh: The info is just as bad and biased towards their agendas of 'love and light' sillinesses and their schisms
[4:43:11 AM] Shiloh: Yes I saw this and this was just like me in grade 8; when I was more interested in Sonja than algebra and trigonometry
[4:43:18 AM] Shiloh: I wanted it slowly or not at all
[4:43:26 AM] Sirius 17: and i agree with him, no one should be timed on tests, its like you finish when you have solved it, each person has their own timing in this and with practice comes speed
[4:43:40 AM] Sirius 17: and confindence
[4:43:55 AM] Sirius 17: this is what happend to me, they ripped my confidence when i was little
[4:44:05 AM] Sirius 17: because i was slow i was told i was too dumb
[4:44:09 AM] Shiloh: Yes, me too; but I was simply disinterested in mathematics and the calculations, algebras in those days
[4:44:12 AM] Sirius 17: and after a while you believe it
[4:44:20 AM] Shiloh: I have Mercury in Taurus lol
[4:44:31 AM] Sirius 17: i have to work twice as hard as anyone else to get math
[4:44:34 AM] Sirius 17: and to keep it
[4:44:38 AM] Shiloh: I always hated time pressure
[4:44:42 AM] Sirius 17: yes me too
[4:44:57 AM] Sirius 17: but with unlimited time i do quite well
[4:45:19 AM] Shiloh: But this slowness allows thoroughness and this is Roger Penrose
[4:45:32 AM] Sirius 17: yes i can appreciate that
[4:45:33 AM] Shiloh: Pedantic Virgo Moon
[4:45:44 AM] Sirius 17: hehe yeah like you
[4:45:49 AM] Sirius 17: lover of details
[4:45:56 AM] Shiloh: I dont know where his planets are
[4:46:04 AM] Shiloh: I need his birthdate
[4:46:36 AM] Sirius 17: born 8 August 1931),
[4:46:44 AM] Sirius 17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
[4:46:47 AM] Shiloh: Leo
[4:46:52 AM] Shiloh: yes I check
[4:47:05 AM] Sirius 17: Born in Colchester, Essex, England,
[4:48:15 AM] Shiloh: You would not believe this
[4:48:26 AM] Shiloh: He has a Virgo Mercury and a Taurus Moon
[4:48:35 AM] Shiloh: The exact Mirror of me
[4:48:37 AM] Sirius 17: i found it interesting of his relationship to Escher
[4:48:46 AM] Sirius 17: lol
[4:48:52 AM] Shiloh: Yes the patterns
[4:48:58 AM] Sirius 17: i do believe it
[4:49:06 AM] Shiloh: Lol
[4:49:19 AM] Sirius 17: not too much suprises me anymore with us
[4:49:36 AM] Sirius 17: of course its all too incredible anyhow
[4:49:42 AM] Shiloh: Mars in Libra and Venus in Cancer
[4:49:52 AM] Shiloh: I have Mars in Cancer
[4:50:03 AM] Sirius 17: lol strange he is a mirror
[4:50:06 AM] Shiloh: Detrimental makes us peaceful
[4:50:10 AM] Shiloh: Nonviolent
[4:50:48 AM] Shiloh: Mars in water is antiwar
[4:51:20 AM] Shiloh: Saturn in Capricorn is native and so a father figure
[4:51:31 AM] Shiloh: He has authority and knows it
[4:51:40 AM] Sirius 17:

Penrose believes that such deterministic yet non-algorithmic processes may come into play in the quantum mechanical wave function reduction, and may be harnessed by the brain. He argues that the present computer is unable to have intelligence because it is an algorithmically deterministic system. He argues against the viewpoint that the rational processes of the mind are completely algorithmic and can thus be duplicated by a sufficiently complex computer. This contrasts with supporters of strong artificial intelligence, who contend that thought can be simulated algorithmically. He bases this on claims that consciousness transcends formal logic because things such as the insolubility of the halting problem and Gödel's incompleteness theorem prevent an algorithmically based system of logic from reproducing such traits of human intelligence as mathematical insight. These claims were originally espoused by the philosopher John Lucas of Merton College, Oxford.


[4:52:07 AM] Shiloh: Yes I agree with him there
[4:52:18 AM] Sirius 17: yes i can see that
[4:52:21 AM] Sirius 17: and i agree too
[4:53:03 AM] Sirius 17: this harkens back to the first principles as well and the underpinning metaphysical algorithmic universe...Logos intelligence
[4:53:15 AM] Sirius 17: i mean it is so logical
[4:53:24 AM] Sirius 17: it just makes sense to me
[4:53:57 AM] Shiloh: Leo Jupiter and Cancer Pluto and Aries Uranus and Virgo Neptune
[4:54:08 AM] Sirius 17: all these people have fear of AI, i dont, because it don't feel it is possible
[4:54:46 AM] Shiloh: Dragon Node and Lilith in Aries, the latter right at the cusp with Pisces
[4:54:52 AM] Sirius 17: if there is to be anything like AI it must come from the human brain period and then remove the 'artificalness'
[4:55:01 AM] Shiloh: Chiron in Taurus
[4:55:14 AM] Sirius 17: oh his lilith is in Aries
[4:55:17 AM] Sirius 17: interesting
[4:55:32 AM] Shiloh: Right in the transit
[4:55:42 AM] Shiloh: One age changes into another age at 0° Aries
[4:55:55 AM] Sirius 17: yes he is before his time lol
[4:56:59 AM] Shiloh: Those are 9 year cycles
[4:58:49 AM] Shiloh: 40° per sign as 9x40°=360°
[4:59:40 AM] Sirius 17: interesting



For further details, a consultation of the Thuban archives on http://cosmosdawn.com is suggested.



Last edited by shiloh on Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:54 am; edited 1 time in total

 

Roger Penrose and the Big Bang Curvature​

Shiloh Za-Rah - Posted May 5th 2010

Hi Mike!
There are a number of points, which align Arp with the mainstream. Now I know you rather accept the prevailing cosmological standard models of the Big Bang Cosmology and the various attempts (barring the multiverses, the anthropic principle and related topics perhaps).
For about 20 years now, I have supported Alan Sandage's measurements of the Hubble Constant. He for long set it at the 55 km/Mpc.s mark and only recently, with the pressure of the WMAP data, has he 'relented' to somewhere around 65 km/Mpc.s.
In my decade long analysis and study of the cosmology, I found the following.

1. The standard model describes the thermodynamic evolution of the cosmos very accurately. So you can reanalyse the WMAP data in their description of the Cosmic Microwave Background BlackBody Radiation (CMBBR) and use this CMBBR as a basis for the emerging parameters of the cosmoevolution.

2. The standard model has 'misinterpreted' the Guth-inflation in the context of the now prevalent membrane physics of the spacetime metrics.
The standard model postulates the Big Bang singularity to become a 'smeared out' minimum spacetime configuration (also expressible as quantum foam or in vertex adjacency of Smolin's quantum loops). This 'smearing out' of the singularity then triggers the (extended) Guth-Inflation, supposedly ending at a time coordinate of so 10^-32 seconds after the Big Bang.
Without delving into technical details; the Guth-Inflation ended at a time coordinate of 3.33x10^-31 seconds and AT THAT coordinate, the Big Bang became manifest in the emergence of spacetime metrics in the continuity of classical general relativity and the quantum gravitational manifesto.
This means, that whilst the Temperature background remains classically valid, the distance scales for the Big Bang will become distorted in the standard model in postulating a universe the scale of a 'grapefruit' at the end of the inflation.
The true size (in Quantum Relativity) of the universe at the end of the inflation was the size of a wormhole, namely at a Compton-Wavelength (Lambda) of 10^-22 meters and so significantly smaller, than a grapefruit.
Needless to say, and in view of the CMBR background of the temperatures, the displacement scales of the standard model will become 'magnified' in the Big Bang Cosmology of the very early universe in the scale ratio of say 10cm/10 ^-20cm=10²¹ i.e. the galactic scales in meter units.
If you study the inflation cosmology more closely, you will find that many cosmologists already know, that the universe had to be 'blown up' to the Hubble Horizon instantaneously (so this is not popularised, as it contradicts the 'grapefruit' scale of Alan Guth).

3. A result of this is that the 'wormhole' of the Big Bang MUST be quantum entangled (or coupled) to the Hubble Horizon. And from this emerges the modular duality of the fifth class of the superstrings in the Weyl-String of the 64-group heterosis.
Again, without technical detail, the Big Bang wormhole becomes a hologram of the Hubble Horizon and they are dimensionally separated by the Scale-parameter between a 3-dimensional space and a 4-doimensional space. This is becoming more and more mainstream in the 5-dimensional spacetime of Kaluza-Klein-Maldacena in de Sitter space becoming the BOUNDARY for the 4D-Minkowski-Riemann-Einstein metrics of the classical cosmology. Of course the Holographic Universe of Susskind, Hawking, Bekenstein and Maldacena plays a crucial part in this, especially as M-Theory has proven, (YES PROVEN in scientific terms), the entropic equivalence of the thermodynamics of Black Holes in the quantum eigenstates of the classical Boltzmann-Shannon entropy.
So your 'speculative' status of string theory is a little 'out of date'. The trouble with the Susskind googolplex solutions is that they (if just Witten would have access to my data) fail to take into account the superstring selftransformations of the duality-coupled five classes. They think that all five classes manifest at the Planck-scale (therefore the zillions of solutions), they do not and transform into each other to manifest the Big Bang in a minimum spacetime configuration at the Weylian wormhole of class HE(8x8).
Roger Penrose has elegantly described the link of this to classical General Relativity in his "Weyl Curvature Hypothesis".
Quote from:'The large, the Small and the Human Mind"-Cambridge University Press-1997 from Tanner Lectures 1995"; page 45-46:

"I want to introduce a hypothesis which I call the 'Weyl Curvature Hypothesis'. This is not an implication of any known theory. As I have said, we do not know what the theory is, because we do not know how to combine the physics of the very large and the very small. When we do discover that theory, it should have as one of its consequences this feature which I have called the Weyl Curvature Hypothesis. Remember that the Weyl curvature is that bit of the Riemann tensor which causes distortions and tidal effects. For some reason we do not yet understand, in the neighbourhood of the Big Bang, the appropriate combination of theories must result in the Weyl tensor being essentially zero, or rather being constrained to be very small indeed.

The Weyl Curvature Hypothesis is time-asymmetrical and it applies only to the past type singularities and not to the future singularities. If the same flexibility of allowing the Weyl tensor to be 'general' that I have applied in the future also applied to the past of the universe, in the closed model, you would end up with a dreadful looking universe with as much mess in the past as in the future. This looks nothing like the universe we live in. What is the probability that, purely by chance, the universe had an initial singularity looking even remotely as it does?
The probability is less than one part in (10¹⁰)¹²³. Where does this estimate come from? It is derived from a formula by Jacob Bekenstein and Stephen Hawking concerning Black Hole entropy and, if you apply it in this particular context, you obtain this enormous answer. It depends how big the universe is and, if you adopt my own favourite universe, the number is, in fact, infinite.

What does this say about the precision that must be involved in setting up the Big Bang? It is really very, very extraordinary, I have illustrated the probability in a cartoon of the Creator, finding a very tiny point in that phase space which represents the initial conditions from which our universe must have evolved if it is to resemble remotely the one we live in. To find it, the Creator has to locate that point in phase space to an accuracy of one part in (10¹⁰)¹²³. If I were to put one zero on each elementary particle in the universe, I still could not write the number down in full. It is a stupendous number". End of Quote

4. Then of course I claim, that the Theory of Quantum Relativity represents a kind of 'Newtonian Approximation' to the 'Theory we have yet to find', mentioned by Roger Penrose in the above.
Then the 'phase spaced' de Broglie inflation is in moduar quantum entanglement with the Weyl-Wormhole of the Zero-Curvature of Roger Penrose's hypothesis and this solves the 'Riddle of Space' in somewhat the manner Allen Francom has postulated.
The Hubble-Universe consists of 'adjacent' Weyl-wormholes, discretisizing all physical parameters in holofractal selfsimilarity.
Penrose's Weyl-tensor is zero as the quasi-reciprocal of the infinite curvature of the Hubble Event Horizon - quasi because the two scales (of the wormhole and Hubble Universe) are dimensionally separated in the modular coupling of the 11D supermembrane boundary to the 10D superstring classical cosmology of the underpinning Einstein-Riemann-Weyl tensor of the Minkowski (flat) metric.

5. Finally then, the Hubble Law as applied in the standard model becomes a restricted case, applicable ONLY at the Node of the 11D asymptotic limit/boundary also BEING the Initial condition, Penrose writes of.
Then and there the Hubble Constant is truly Constant at 58.03 km/MPc.s; vindicating both Alan Sandage and Halton Arp, the latter in his questioning of the Hubble Law to characterise the cosmic distance scales.

6. Because of the duality coupling between the wormhole and the Hubble horizon, the Hubble-Horizon in 10D is always smaller than the Hubble Horizon in 11D (the first is defined in a 4D Minkowski spacetime and the second in a 5D Kaluza-Klein hypersphere). So the standard cosmology will measure an 'accelerating universe' where there is actually an 'electromagnetic intersection' of the 11D- Big Bang Light having reflected from the 11D boundary and recoupling with the 10D expansion.
Halton Arp's redshifts are also dual in that the special relativistic doppler formulation is absolutely sufficient to relate the cosmological redshift to cosmic displacement scales (and without the Hubble Law H_o=v_rec/D). So the redshift measurement is the true parameter and must then be correlated with the expansion factor of General Relativity to ascertain the lowerD coordinates of the observed phenpomena encompassed by the higherD coordinates (through the values of the expansion parameter).
Briefly, the expanding universe presently moves at 0.22c with a deceleration of about 0.01 nanometers per second squared. But because the Hubble Horizon ITSELF recedes presently at 0.22c particular 'redshift corrections' must be applied to the VALID measurements of the latter to ascertain the cosmological distance scales of the lightemitters.
John Shadow


--- In Christianity_Debate@yahoogroups.com, "MikeA" <atomicbohr@...> wrote:
--- In Christianity_Debate@yahoogroups.com, drcsanyi drcsanyi@ wrote:
It is you who do not recognize the vast difference between Arp and the "Big Bang" model.
[MIKE] I see Arp has been busy since he retired. This is what I gather. Arp disagrees as he has his whole career that quasars' redshifts are due to distance. He now apparently feels that they are being ejected from certain very active galaxies and that because of this the universe the Hubble constant should be about 55 not the 70 something it now is calculated to be. I should point out that there is nothing very unusual in this. Allan Sandage who took over Hubble's task when Hubble died thinks the number is closer to 55 than 70. And Thomas Matthews who discovered these ubiquitous quasars with Sandage has also found some quasars that are nearby. Please note I said some.
Arp is now of the opinion that Hoyle was right and is fooling with a cyclic steady state universe if that is not an oxymoron. From what i can discern one is going to get the same observations with either model for the forseeable future.



Post last edited May 5th 2010

 

My Posts
Admin Posts: 2160
Shiloh Za-Rah - Posted Oct 21st 2011
October 19, 2011

The First Monstrous Objects of the Early Universe




New observations from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope strongly suggest that infrared light detected in a prior study originated from clumps of the very first objects of the Universe. The recent data indicate this patchy light is splattered across the entire sky and comes from clusters of bright, monstrous objects more than 13 billion light-years away.

"We are pushing our telescopes to the limit and are tantalizingly close to getting a clear picture of the very first collections of objects," said Dr. Alexander Kashlinsky of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Cente. "Whatever these objects are, they are intrinsically incredibly bright and very different from a.nything in existence today."
Astronomers believe the objects are either the first stars -- humongous stars more than 1,000 times the mass of our sun -- or voracious black holes that are consuming gas and spilling out tons of energy. If the objects are stars, then the observed clusters might be the first mini-galaxies containing a mass of less than about one million suns. The Milky Way galaxy holds the equivalent of approximately 100 billion suns and was probably created when mini-galaxies like these merged.
Scientists say that space, time and matter originated 13.7 billion years ago in a tremendous explosion called the Big Bang. Observations of the cosmic microwave background by a co-author of the recent Spitzer studies, Dr. John Mather of Goddard, and his science team strongly support this theory. Mather is a co-winner of the 2006 Nobel Prize for Physics for this work. Another few hundred million years or so would pass before the first stars would form, ending the so-called dark age of the Universe.
With Spitzer, Kashlinsky's group studied the cosmic infrared background, a diffuse light from this early epoch when structure first emerged. Some of the light comes from stars or black hole activity so distant that, although it originated as ultraviolet and optical light, its wavelengths have been stretched to infrared wavelengths by the growing space-time that causes the Universe's expansion. Other parts of the cosmic infrared background are from distant starlight absorbed by dust and re-emitted as infrared light.
"There's ongoing debate about what the first objects were and how galaxies formed," said Dr. Harvey Moseley of Goddard, a co-author on the papers. "We are on the right track to figuring this out. We've now reached the hilltop and are looking down on the village below, trying to make sense of what's going on."
The analysis first involved carefully removing the light from all foreground stars and galaxies in the five regions of the sky, leaving only the most ancient light. The scientists then studied fluctuations in the intensity of infrared brightness, in the relatively diffuse light. The fluctuations revealed a clustering of objects that produced the observed light pattern.
"Imagine trying to see fireworks at night from across a crowded city," said Kashlinsky. "If you could turn off the city lights, you might get a glimpse at the fireworks. We have shut down the lights of the Universe to see the outlines of its first fireworks."
"Spitzer has paved the way for the James Webb Space Telescope, which should be able to identify the nature of the clusters," said Mather, who is senior project scientist for NASA's future James Webb Space Telescope.
The image at the top of the page reveals a background glow of light from a period of time when the universe was less than one billion years old. This light most likely originated from the universe's very first groups of objects -- either huge stars or voracious black holes.
The image from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope shows a region of sky in the Ursa Major constellation. To create this image, stars, galaxies and other sources were masked out. This infrared image covers a region of space so large that light would take up to 100 million years to travel across it. Darker shades in the image on the left correspond to dimmer parts of the background glow, while yellow and white show the brightest light.
The Daily Galaxy via http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/images/1695-ssc2006-22a1-The-Universe-s-First-Fireworks​

Posted at 01:00 AM | Permalink



a) The Quantum-Holographic Transformation of the Earth
b) Why Black Holes preceded Galaxies in the Cosmology
c) The First Ylemic Stars in the Universe and the Antiwormholes
d) The Holographic Universe and the Information Processing


a) The Quantum-Holographic Transformation of the Earth

When the Universe was born from its subplenar (infinite) void to reflect this void in the physical plenum reality of spacetimematter, a particular 'point of origin' became necessitated to mirror the 'voidal vortex' of the subplenum in the then reality of a metric plenum.

This part of the agenda shall then show, that the planet earth can be metrically defined to represent this 'mapping of the void'; the earth so becoming enabled to relate the entire information content (and including all inertial systems and spacetime coordinates) of the universe to itself and all and sundry 'sentient civilisations' within it.

This 'voidal vortex' is like the nonphysicality or abstraction of a 'mathematical point' becoming 'physicalised' in a 2-dimensional manifold or surface as a physicalised 'area' dimension, thus allowing 'measurement' in some unit for displacement.

The conceptual infinity of the subplenum (Void=Nothing=Everything) so either doubles- or halves itself to enable the Unity operator to emerge from the Void.
Geometrically, this is simply the dimensional generator of the Null-Dimension as the 'Point' mapping itself as 'Double-Point' yet being the original 'Point' by mathematical induction.

The 1st dimension so emerges as the arbitrary manner this 'double-point' can align itself; thus defining the minimum displacement between the two points. Physically this becomes the Planck-Length, operated on by a dimensional generator and the 'Energization' of the Planck-Length is known as a (open) type I Planck-superstring, radius the Planck-Length {L_P=√(hG_o/2πc³) .
This Planck-Radius then can form into a (closed) type I Planck-Membrane or Planck-Circle in forming a Planck-Loop of Planck-Energy {E_P=hc/2πL_P=√(hc⁵/2πG_o)}.

The mass of this Planck-Loop is the Planck-Mass {m_P=E_P/c²=√(hc/2πG_o)=L_Pc²/G_o} As the Planck-Minimum Energy must be 'halved' for the Void-Unity mapping; a physical description for the latter becomes necessary.
This description engages the labellings of Gravitational Potential Energy for the 'Point-Mass' and its coupling to the 'bridge' (or wormhole) between the subplenum and the plenum. This is known as the Planck-Oscillator of the Zero-Point of energy E_o=hc/4πL_P=hω/4π=½hf_P=½h/t_P=½m_Pc².
This minimised Planck-Oscillator energy is also the minimised Gravitational Potential Energy in E_GPE=G_om.m_P/L_P from the gravitational acceleration per 'point-mass m': ma_g=G_om.m_P/L_P² Therefore, E_GPE=G_om.m_P/L_P =E_o=½m_Pc² for L_P=2G_om/c² and which represents the basic minimum Schwarzschild metric for the solution of the 'field equations' in General Relativity, descriptive of the interaction between spacetime curvature and the inertia content in a local 'neighbourhood of pointmasses' of the universe.
The geometric mapping of the 'point' onto itself, can now be constructed in physicality. The 'voidal vortex' becomes simply the minimum Schwarzschild metric defined in the Planck-String Oscillator and so represents a 'Black Hole' or a 'Voidal Vortex' in superstring/membrane (Planckian) parameters.

Geometrically then, the 'pointmass' is rendered physical in the 'Planck-area', either as a 'Planck-Square' with side the 'Planck-Length' L_P) or a Planck-Circle of Area πL_P². The 'bridging' wormhole between the plenum of the Planck parameters and the subplenum of the original Nothing=Infinity void then becomes the topological deformation of the Planck-Circle into a Planck-Ellipse with a corresponding displacement of the singularity focus (the center) of the circle into two foci for the Planck-Ellipse.
Having two foci, defined in the geometrical definition of an ellipse as an 'eccentric circle' then allows the two foci to communicate with each other in a precise geometrical relationship. The locus of an ellipse is defined in any point P on the ellipse joined to both of the two foci being a constant summation of the individual displacement vectors from the focus points to the point P on the ellipsical locus. Rotation of such an ellipse about its major (longer) axis, then will give the ellipsoidal volumar, minimised as a ellipsoidal or spheroidal (actually toroidal) Planckian volume in 3 dimensions.

As the universe (in spacetime) is defined in a summation of the minimum Planck-area counts and so the Planckian loops; a simple deformation of the Planck-area unit into a two-focal ellipsoidal volumar will so allow a higher dimensional 'fractally discrete' continuum to connect any two such discretized locations within the universe via this bifocalised 'holofractal' quantum geometry.
The intelligence or logos, who transformed (some of) the abstract 'energy' of the subplenum as an infinite 'reservoir' of 'sourcesink energy' into a then finite thermodynamic energy (as defined in the Laws of Nature and the Conservation Laws) then established the 'distribution of this materialised energy'; first as kinematic-thermodynamic gravitational noninertial mass in a hitherto massless cosmos {E=Σhf} and secondly as an inertial electromagnetic mass {E=Σmc²}in a first principle of the Einsteinian 'Principle of Equivalence'.

When the universe of the plenum emerged from the subplenum about 19.11 billion (civil) years ago; this bifocalisation became established and assigned an axial direction to the subsequent cosmological evolution, albeit relative to the manifestation of the focalisations on the major ellipsoidal axis. After the universe had attained an expansion speed of so 29.3% of lightspeed so 14.3 billion years after the Big Bang (or so 4.8 billion years ago); the cosmological 'birth of the earth' from the solar nebula materialised the 'Universal Focus Point' on an arbitrary major axis of the spheroidal universe and specified the physics of the 'evolution of the planetary focus' relative to the rest of the universe.
This focal evolution 'inverts' the cosmic expansion in 11 dimensions in a cosmology which is purely electromagnetic in a supermembrane-mirror function of the original noninertial cosmos of the gravitational- or photonic mass equivalence. (It is the lower dimensional 'string' evolution which is asymptotic in the inertial mass, itself transformed from the gravitational mass in 10 dimensions).

For an electromagnetic age of the universe of T=19.11 billion years then; the inverted lightspeed 1/c defines the '11-dimensional' envelope of the earth as the 'Universal Focal Point'. The Inversion-Lightpath X_inverse=(1/c)T for a 'Displacement-Radius' for the earth of about 2.01 million kilometers and for a yearly increase of this radius by 105 millimeters.
Therefore, even when the planet earth did not exist in physicality; its 'Sphere of Inversion' existed as a focalisation and a 'radial size' of 1.50 million kilometers.

The Mass of the earth is about M_Earth=6x10²⁴ kilograms and this is identical to a '11-dimensional Black Hole' of Schwarzschild-Radius: R_SEarth=2G_oM_Earth/c²~15 millimeters. The 11-dimensional supermembrane around this Earth-Singularity is at a location in the local solar system of about 5% to the planet Venus and so encompasses the Moon at 384,000 kilometers for the 2 million kilometers.
The master timeline then defines the nexus, when the 11-dimensional Black Hole at the center of the planetary earth literally 'turns inside out' to form a 11-dimensional White Hole. The trigger for this Möbian transformation of the planetary core will be a 'light signal' sent from the galactic center (Hunab Ku in Mayan cosmology) precisely 65 baktuns from the Mayan end date on December 21st, 2012 and so 65x144,000=9,360,000 kin or days ago in the (civil) year 23,615 BC.

This signal from the galactic center is itself a 'wormhole' quanta as a minimum 'Planck-volumar' and also as a 'Consciousness-Quantum' so its interaction with the earth-core quantum will allow the Sink-Nature of the Black Hole equivalent to transform into a Source-Nature or White Hole equivalent.
The 'New Earth' will so become a cosmic emitter, broadcasting its 'absorbed' information, collected throughout its 4.8 billion year evolution in a form of Hawking Radiation and travelling at lightspeed from the planetary core.
The 'absorbed' Black Hole information of the 'Old Earth' so will become a 'New Context' for the rest of the universe; then enabled to 'Witness' the (often horrendous and sometimes magnificent) planetary evolution of the data-collectors upon the planet earth and inclusive of all lifeforms.
Further technical information will be published at a later date in the master timeline.
September, 1st, 2009 - The 2nd Day of the Babylonian Captivity of planet earth. Elijah Malachi


b) Why Black Holes preceded Galaxies in the Cosmology

The symbiotic relationship between black holes and galaxies in the standard models of astrophysics and cosmology has been known for decades. Yet the particular order of this partnership had to await improved technological equipment to enable a more detailed examination and analysis of the Super-Massive Black-Holes (SMBHs) known to reside at the center of basically all galaxies on whatever scale. It has become standard knowledge, that black holes had to come first; somehow seeding subsequently evolving galaxies as vortex energy concentrations.
What is presently not understood, is why black holes preceded galaxies. As black holes must necessarily represent systems of maximised entropy; the paradox arises, how a exquisitely low entropy state of the Quantum Big Bang could manifest maximised systems of information disorder in black holes, and entropic systems, which would then evolve into galactic systems of higher self-order

Entropy or the natural dispersion tendency of material systems, such as a gas or a random particle distribution; can be either described as a thermodynamic entropic system or as a system of Shannon information. The thermodynamic system is modelled on the number of permutations say a stochastic particle distribution can accomodate; whilst Shannon information describes this integral of eigenstates as a summation of bits.
The solution is found in the nature of the Big Bang boundary condition and how this condition manifests both the maximum- and the minimum entropic initializing self-state simultaneously.

All of the information of the Big Bang was collectified in a primordial mass seed M_o and as a 'Seed of Inertia', which defines the so called 'singularity' at the center of any black hole as well as the 'singularity' at the beginning of the material universe. All of this information then became dispersed in a hyper-inflation, which defined the 'collected' and minimum entropy mass seed as a 'dispersed' and maximum entropy mass seed M_critical.
There so exists a coupling between this inertia seedling for a subsequent 'kinematic thermodynamic expansion' of that seed in a form of vortex distribution - and the encompassing inertia seedling M_critical, necessarily of a higher dimension, than the 'concentrated' M_o.
The proportionality between the two seeds is M_o/M_critical=q_o=0.01405.. and a ratio, which also defines the proportionality between the hyper-inflating acceleration (A_deBroglie=R_Hubble.c²/ λ_wormhole²) and the so named 'Cosmological Constant or Einstein-Lambda Λ_Einstein=G_oM_o/λ_wormhole²) and as a deceleration parameter which is half of the ratio between the actual- and the critical density aka the Ω_o=ρ_actual/ρ_critical=2q_o.
The initial string-parametric boundary condition for the cosmogenesis (and with E a spacetime quanta counter) so can be stated as:
A_deBroglie/Λ_Einstein=M_o/M_critical=0.01405... with further definitions below.

{M_o² =E(m_Pm_c/m_e)² as the initialising Big Bang inertia seed (in 10 dimensions) and the critical 'closure mass (in 11 dimensions) for a 'nodal' Hubble-'Constant' H_o=c/R_Hubble becomes:
M_critical=ρ_criticalV_max=(3H_o²/8πG_o)(4πR_Hubble³/3)=R_Hubblec²/2G_o and so for the Hubble-Radius being the encompassing extremal SMBH requirement as the Schwarzschild solution.}

The minimum entropy state, defining the Quantum Big Bang so is defined in the wormhole perimeter ^λ_wormhole=2πr_wormhole, behaving like a Einstein-Rosen-Bridge in 'Tunneling' the minimum entropy mass seedling M_o from the subplenum into the plenum, thus describing the Quantum Big Bang and the 'escape of the singularity' as the manifestation of a White Hole at the boundary between the subplenum of NoTime and the plenum of InTime.

The inertia seed M_o in 10 string dimensions began to 'drop its seeds' in a light speed expansion of the 'Hubble-Bubble'. The 'space' for this 'dropping of the seeds' had been previously created in the hyper inflation as the 11-dimensional 'Hubble-Bubble-Envelope'.
The 'dropping of the seeds' occured via vortices, becoming Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE and as the true nature for the so called 'Virtual Particle' background in the Heisenberg Matrix of discretised spacetime aka the Zero-Point-Energy or the ZPE.
This ZPE=VPE manifested Black-Hole Sink-Vortices, which then could (as function of the metric CMMBR temperature background) form the first protostars as ylemic neutron stars. This scenario is elucidated in detail in the next agenda III.iv.c.
The SMBH of M_critical in 11 dimensions is extremal, meaning it is a boundary condition and does not Hawking radiate in a selfinteraction with the VPE. The SMBH of M_o in 10 dimensions is also extremal, but represents the characteristic supercluster displacement scale in the universe at a diameter of about 472 million lightyears.

No physical black holes can form above this scale, as the difference between the two mass seeds determines the inertia evolution of the M_o seedling in a form of selfinteraction between the two SMBHs. Also the galactic supercluster scale defines the homogeneity and the isotropy of the large scale cosmology, where the superclusters cease to interact in gravitational dynamics. The inertia evolution of the universe is based on a transformation of the 'missing mass' (often called dark matter and also related to the dark energy) into 'Consciousness'. This 'Consciousness' is rigorously defined in string parameters as the angular acceleration (as the timedifferential of frequency) acting upon a collection of space volumars, i.e, some region of 'encapsulated' space. The minimum space-quantum then becomes the scale of the 'tunneling wormhole' as the discretizartion or the 'Holofractalisation' of all metricated spacetimes.
The Quantum Big Bang so emerged an astrophysics of Black Holes from a White Hole 'singularity' or minimum eigenstate.
The Black Hole, characterizing the center of the earth will transform into a holographic image of this 'Primordial White Hole' as the 'Particle of God - the Little Serpent', sent from the galactic center of the Milky Way via the conduit of the universal wormhole tunneling established in the de Broglie hyper-acceleration.

The information of the lower dimensional mass seed then becomes 'mapped' onto the 2-dimensional (rootreduced from 11 dimensions) 'inner' surface of the 'Mother Black Hole' and this engages a surface area 'holofractalised' from the minimum 'Father White Hole', which so is also a 'Father Black Hole' in inertia association. As is well established in contemporary cosmology; the information of a volume-given universe becomes a function of particular boundary conditions in the Hawking entropy as Planck-Area/4 and in the Bekenstein bounds (see agenda III.iv.d).
In general, the Event Horizon of a Black Hole is surrounded by a Photon-Sphere, manifesting at 3/2 times the Schwarzschild radius. This then describes the interaction of the 'absorbed information' with its 'lighted envelope' and is a direct consequence of the toroidal topology of the wormhole quantum geometry.

The wormhole connects a White Hole to a Black Hole in such a manner, that the minimum Planck-Nugget is a deformed sphere, namely a toroidal hypersphere in 3 dimensions behaving like a 3-dimensional surface.
The hyperspher volume is the boundary condition in R³-Riemann space for the Riemann R⁴ space (Volume V₄=π²R⁴/2 with dV₄/dR=V₃=2π²R³ aka the volume of an idealised 2-Torus).

The surface area of a 2-Torus in 3 dimensions is however A_Torus=2πR.2πR=4π²R², while the boundary condition for V₃=2π²R³ is dV₃/dR=A_wormhole=6π²R² for A_wormhole/A_Torus=3/2.
The subplenum so assigns particular boundary conditions onto the 'energy' manifestations in the plenum; but 'coordinates' which are NOT mappable onto the subplenar 'topology' or manifold.

This crystallizes the wormhole connection for the universe to any location and a focalisation nexus called the planet earth.
The mass of the earth is: Mass of the Earth is: M_Earth=6x10²⁴ kg. The mass of the Galactic Core known to be a 'galactic constant' of about (500-1000) times the central Black Hole and in M_Core=750M_SA*.

The mass of the Central Black Hole aka Sagittarius A* is: M_SA* =4.4x10⁶ suns or 9x10³⁶ kg. The mass seedling of the Universe at the 'Beginning' of the Big Bang is M_o= 2x10⁵¹ kg and the mass seedling of the Universe at the 'End' of the Big Bang is M_critical =6.5x10⁵² kg.
Then (M_Core/M_Earth)=constant.(M_SA* /M_o) for constant=(M_CoreM_o/M_SA*M_Earth), which calculates as (750x81x10⁷²)/(12x10⁷⁵)~5.1 and so of the order of unity (1) and say as a 'Upper Bound'. But the seedling mass defines cosmologically a substructured, albeit still extremal Black Hole in the gravitational attraction between supercluster and so the homogeneity and isotropy of the standard cosmology.

The encompassing 'universal' Black Hole mass is extradimensional (like the golfball Black Hole defining the central earth) and so is calculated to 'topologically close' the 'string-universe' (in a 'Calabi Yau' 6-torus geometry) for the super-seeded Universe (with a 17 billion year 'heartbeat' or Hubble Oscillation).
Using M_critical then, constant=(750x81x10⁷²)/(39x10⁷⁶)~0.16 again of order unity, but now as a 'Lower Bound'.

The Evolution of the 'Lower Bound' for the encompassing cosmology in the higher dimension (11 or 8 or 5 or 2) towards the 'Upper Bound' then becomes an evolution of 'Cosmic Consciousness'; well understood by indigenous peoples all around the globe; but labelled as 'dark matter' by the physical materialists and scientists. The 'Dark Matter' is the 'Spirit' in particular string-membrane coupled associations.
In terms of the volumes, the golfball sized (Schwarzschilded) Black Holed earth is V_SEarth=(4π/3)(0.015m)³~1.4x10^-5 cubic meters or so 14 cubic centimeters. This compares to the 'ordinary' spacetimed V_Earth==(4π/3)(6370km)³~10²¹ cubic meters.

The ratio V_Earth/V_SEarth~10²¹/(1.4x10^-5)~7x10²⁵ meters as the order of the size of the entire universe in the Hubble-Radius {R_Hubble=1.60x10²⁶ m}.
The sum total of the information contained in the planetary earth so becomes 'data compressed' in the black holed earth and then reemerges from absorption to emission through a white holed conduit for the benefit of the universe in cellular hierarchies and all of the intelligences contained within the supermembraned Mother-Black Holed Envelope M_critical. The planetary earth itself will so become a 'Mother-Planet' for the universal sentiences.



c) The First Ylemic Stars in the Universe and the Antiwormholes

The stability of stars is a function of the equilibrium condition, which balances the inward pull of gravity with the outward pressure of the thermodynamic energy or enthalpy of the star (H=PV+U). The Jeans Mass M_J and the Jeans Length R_J a used to describe the stability conditions for collapsing molecular hydrogen clouds to form stars say, are well known in the scientific data base, say in formulations such as:

M_J=3kTR/2Gm for a Jeans Length of: R_J=√{15kT/(4πρGm)}=R_J =√(kT/Gnm²).
Now the Ideal Gas Law of basic thermodynamics states that the internal pressure P and Volume of such an ideal gas are given by PV=nRT=NkT for n moles of substance being the Number N of molecules (say) divided by Avogadro's Constant L in n=N/L .
Since the Ideal Gas Constant R divided by Avogadro's Constant L and defines Boltzmann's Constant k=R/L. Now the statistical analysis of kinetic energy KE of particles in motion in a gas (say) gives a root-mean-square velocity (rms) and the familiar 2.KE=mv²(rms) from the distribution of individual velocities v in such a system.
It is found that PV=(2/3)N.KE as a total system described by the v(rms). Now set the KE equal to the Gravitational PE=GMm/R for a spherical gas cloud and you get the Jeans Mass. (3/2N).(NkT)=GMm/R with m the mass of a nucleon or Hydrogen atom and M=M_J=3kTR/2Gm as stated.
The Jeans' Length is the critical radius of a cloud (typically a cloud of interstellar dust) where thermal energy, which causes the cloud to expand, is counteracted by gravity, which causes the cloud to collapse. It is named after the British astronomer Sir James Jeans, who first derived the quantity; where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is the temperature of the cloud, r is the radius of the cloud, μ is the mass per particle in the cloud, G is the Gravitational Constant and ρ is the cloud's mass density (i.e. the cloud's mass divided by the cloud's volume).
Now following the Big Bang, there were of course no gas clouds in the early expanding universe and the Jeans formulations are not applicable to the mass seedling M_o; in the manner of the Jeans formulations as given.
However, the universe's dynamics is in the form of the expansion parameter of GR and so the R(n)=R_max(n/(n+1)) scalefactor of Quantum Relativity.
So we can certainly analyse this expansion in the form of the Jeans Radius of the first protostars, which so obey the equilibrium conditions and equations of state of the much later gas clouds, for which the Jeans formulations then apply on a say molecular level.
This analysis so defines the ylemic neutron stars as protostars and the first stars in the cosmogenesis and the universe.
Let the thermal internal energy or ITE=H be the outward pressure in equilibrium with the gravitational potential energy of GPE=Ω. The nuclear density in terms of the superbrane parameters is ρ_critical=m_c/V_critical with m_c a base-nuleon mass for a 'ylemic neutron'.
V_critical= 4πR_e³/3 or the volume for the ylemic neutron as given by the classical electron radius R_e=10¹⁰λ_wormhole/360=e*/2c².

H=(molarity)kT for molar volume as N=(R/R_e)³ for dH=3kTR²/R_e³.
Ω(R)= -∫G_oMdm/R = -{3G_om_c²/(R_e³)² }∫R⁴dR = -3G_om_c²R⁵/R_e⁶ for
dm/dR=d(ρV)/dR=4πρR² and for ρ=3m_c/4πR_e³

For equilibrium, the requirement is that dH=dΩ in the minimum condition dH+dΩ=0.
This gives: dH+dΩ=3kTR²/R_e³ - 16G_oπ²ρ²R⁴/3=0 and the ylemic radius as:
R_ylem=√{kTR_e/G_om_c²}
as the Jeans-Length precursor or progenitor for subsequent stellar and galactic generation.

The ylemic (Jeans) radii are all independent of the mass of the star as a function of its nuclear generated temperature. Applied to the protostars of the vortex neutron matter or ylem, the radii are all neutron star radii and define a specific range of radii for the gravitational collapse of the electron degenerate matter.

This spans from the 'First Three Minutes' scenario of the cosmogenesis to 1.1 million seconds (or about 13 days) and encompasses the standard beta decay of the neutron (underpinning radioactivity). The upper limit defines a trillion degree temperature and a radius of over 40 km; the trivial Schwarzschild solution gives a typical ylem radius of so 7.4 kilometers and the lower limit defines the 'mysterious' planetesimal limit as 1.8 km.

For long a cosmological conundrum, it could not be modelled just how the molecular and electromagnetic forces applicable to conglomerate matter distributions (say gaseous hydrogen as cosmic dust) on the quantum scale of molecules could become strong enough to form say 1km mass concentrations, required for 'ordinary' gravity to assume control.

The ylem radii's lower limit is defined in this cosmology then show, that it is the ylemic temperature of the 1.2 billion degrees K, which perform the trick under the Ylem-Jeans formulation and which then is applied to the normal collapse of hydrogenic atoms in summation.

The stellar evolution from the ylemic(dineutronic) templates is well established in QR and confirms most of the Standard Model's ideas of nucleosynthesis and the general Temperature cosmology. The standard model is correct in the temperature assignment, but is amiss in the corresponding 'size-scales' for the cosmic expansion.
The Big Bang cosmogenesis describes the universe as a Planck-Black Body Radiator, which sets the Cosmic-Microwave-Black Body Background Radiation Spectrum (CMBBR) as a function of n as T⁴=18.2(n+1)²/n³ and derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law and the related statistical frequency distributions.
We have the GR metric for Schwarzschild-Black Hole Evolution as R_S=2GM/c² as a function of the star's Black Hole's mass M and we have the ylemic Radius as a function of temperature only as R_ylem√(kT.R_e³/G_om_c²).
The nucleonic mass-seed m_c=m_P.Alpha⁹ and the product G_om_c² is a constant in the partitioned n-evolution of
m_c(n)=Yⁿ.m_c and G(n)=G_o.Xⁿ.
Identifying the ylemic Radius with the Schwarzschild Radius then indicates a specific mass a specific temperature and a specific radius.

Those we call the Chandrasekhar Parameters:
M_Chandra=1.5 solar Masses=3x10³⁰ kg and R_Chandra=2G_oM_Chandra/c² or 7407.40704..metres, which is the typical neutron star radius inferred today.
T_Chandra=R_Chandra².G_om_c²/kR_e³ =1.985x10¹⁰ K for Electron Radius R_e and Boltzmann's Constant k.
Those Chandrasekhar parameters then define a typical neutron star with a uniform temperature of 20 billion K at the white dwarf limit of ordinary stellar nucleosynthetic evolution (Hertzsprung-Russell or HR-diagram).
The Radius for the massparametric Universe is given in R(n)=R_max(1-n/(n+1)) correlating the ylemic temperatures as the 'uniform' CMBBR-background and we can follow the evolution of the ylemic radius via the approximation:
R_ylem=0.05258..√T=(0.0753).[(n+1)²/n³]^[1/8]
R_ylem(n_present=1.1324..)=0.0868 m* for a T_ylem(n_present )=2.73 K for the present time
t_present=n_present/H_o.

What then is n_Chandra?
This would describe the size of the universe as the uniform temperature CMBBR today manifesting as the largest stars, mapped however onto the ylemic neutron star evolution as the protostars (say as n_Chandra'), defined not in manifested mass (say neutron conglomerations), but as a quark-strange plasma, (defined in QR as the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE).

R(n_Chandra')=R_max(n_Chandra'/(n_Chandra'+1))=7407.40741.. for n_Chandra'=4.64x10^-23 and so a time of t_Chandra'=n_Chandra'/H_o=n_Chandra'/1.88x10^-18=2.47x10^-5 seconds.

QR defines the Weyl-Temperature limit for Bosonic Unification as 1.9 nanoseconds at a temperature of 1.4x10²⁰ Kelvin and the weak-electromagnetic unification at 1/365 seconds at T=3.4x10¹⁵ K.
So we place the first ylemic protostar after the bosonic unification (before which the plenum was defined as undifferentiated 'bosonic plasma'), but before the electro-weak unification, which defined the Higgs-Bosonic restmass induction via the weak interaction vector-bosons and allowing the dineutrons to be born.
The universe was so 15 km across, when its ylemic 'concentrated' VPE-Temperature was so 20 Billion K and we find the CMBBR in the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law as:
T⁴=18.20(n+1)²/n³=1.16x10¹⁷ Kelvin.
So the thermodynamic temperature for the expanding universe was so 5.85 Million times greater than the ylemic VPE-Temperature; and implying that no individual ylem stars could yet form from the mass seedling M_o.
The universe's expansion however cooled the CMBBR background and we to calculate the scale of the universe corresponding to this ylemic scenario; we simply calculate the 'size' for the universe at T_Chandra=20 Billion K for T_Chandra⁴ and we then find n_Chandra=4.89x10^-14 and t_Chandra=26,065 seconds or so 7.24 hours.
The Radius R(n_Chandra)=7.81x10¹² metres or 7.24 lighthours.
This is about 52 Astronomical Units and an indicator for the largest possible star in terms of radial extent and the 'size' of a typical solar system, encompassed by supergiants on the HR-diagram.

We so know that the ylemic temperature decreases in direct proportion to the square of the ylemic radius and one hitherto enigmatic aspect in cosmology relates to this in the planetesimal limit. Briefly, a temperature of so 1.2 billion degrees defines an ylemic radius of 1.8 km as the dineutronic limit for proto-neutron stars contracting from so 80 km down to this size just 1.1 million seconds or so 13 days after the Big Bang.
This then 'explains' why chunks of matter can conglomerate via molecular and other adhesive interactions towards this size, where then the accepted gravity is strong enough to build planets and moons. It works, because the ylemic template is defined in subatomic parameters reflecting the mesonic-inner and leptonic outer ring boundaries, the planetesimal limit being the leptonic mapping. So neutrino- and quark blueprints micromacro dance their basic definition as the holographic projections of the spacetime quanta.

Now because the Electron Radius is directly proportional to the linearised wormhole perimeter and then the Compton Radius via Alpha in R_e=10¹⁰λ_wormhole=e*/2c²=Alpha.R_Compton, the Chandrasekhar White Dwarf limit should be doubled to reflect the protonic diameter mirrored in the classical electron radius.

Hence any star experiencing electron degeneracy is actually becoming ylemic or dineutronic, the boundary for this process being the Chandrasekhar mass. This represents the subatomic mapping of the first Bohr orbit collapsing onto the leptonic outer ring in the quarkian wave-geometry.
But this represents the Electron Radius as a Protonic Diameter and the Protonic Radius must then indicate the limit for the scale where proton degeneracy would have to enter the scenario. As the proton cannot degenerate in that way, the neutron star must enter Black Hole phasetransition at the R_e/2 scale, corresponding to a mass of 8M_Chandra=24x10³⁰ kg* or 12 solar masses.
The maximum ylemic radius so is found from the constant density proportion ρ=M/V:
(R_ylemmax/R_e)³=M_Chandra/m_c for R_ylemmax=40.1635 km.
The corresponding ylemic temperature is 583.5 Billion K for a CMBBR-time of 287 seconds or so 4.8 minutes from a n=5.4x10^-16, when the universe had a diameter of so 173 Million km.
But for a maximum nuclear compressibility for the protonic radius, we find:
(R_ylemmax/R_e)³=8M_Chandra/m_c for R_ylemmax=80.327 km, a ylemic temperature of 2,334 Billion K for a n-cycletime of 8.5x10^-17 and a CMBBR-time of so 45 seconds and when the universe had a radius of 13.6 Million km or was so 27 Million km across.

The first ylemic protostar vortex was at that time manifested as the ancestor for all neutron star generations to follow. This vortex is described in a cosmic string encircling a spherical region so 160 km across and within a greater universe of diameter 27 Million km which carried a thermodynamic temperature of so 2.33 Trillion Kelvin at that point in the cosmogenesis.
This vortex manifested as a VPE concentration after the expanding universe had cooled to allow the universe to become transparent from its hitherto defining state of opaqueness and a time known as the decoupling of matter (in the form of the M_o seedling partitioned in m_c's) from the radiation pressure of the CMBBR photons.
The temperature for the decoupling is found in the galactic scale-limit modular dual to the wormhole geodesic as 1/λ_wormhole=λ_antiwormhole=λ_{galaxyserpent}=10²² metres or so 1.06 Million ly and its luminosity attenuation in the 1/e proportionality for then 388,879 lightyears as a decoupling time n_decoupling.
A maximum galactic halo limit is modulated in 2πλ_antiwormhole metres in the linearisation of the Planck-length encountered before in an earlier discussion.

R(n_decoupling)=R_max(n_decoupling/(n_decouplingc+1))=10²² metres for n_decoupling=6.26x10^-5 and so for a CMBBR-Temperature of about T=2935 K for a galactic protocore then attenuated in so 37% for n_{decouplingmin}=1.0x10^-6 for R=λ_antiwormhole/2π and n_{decouplingmax}=3.9x10^-4 for R=2πλ_antiwormhole and for temperatures of so 65,316 K and 744 K respectively, descriptive of the temperature modulations between the galactic cores and the galactic halos.

So a CMBBR-temperature of so 65,316 K at a time of so 532 Billion seconds or 17,000 years defined the initialisation of the VPE and the birth of the first ylemic protostars as a decoupling minimum. The ylemic mass currents were purely monopolic and known as superconductive cosmic strings, consisting of nucleonic neutrons, each of mass m_c.
If we assign this timeframe to the maximised ylemic radius and assign our planetesimal limit of fusion temperature 1.2 Billion K as a corresponding minimum; then this planetesimal limit representing the onset of stellar fusion in a characteristic temperature, should indicate the first protostars at a temperature of the CMBBR of about 744 Kelvin.

The universe had a tremperature of 744 K for n_{decouplingmax}=3.9x10^-4 for R=2πλ_antiwormhole and this brings us to a curvature radius of so 6.6 Million lightyears and an 'ignition-time' for the first physical ylemic neutron stars as first generation protostars of so 7 Million years after the Big Bang.
The important cosmological consideration is that of distance-scale modulation.
The Black Hole Schwarzschild metric is the inverse of the galactic scale metric.
The linearisation of the Planck-String as the Weyl-Geodesic and so the wormhole radius in the curvature radius R(n) is modular dual and mirrored in inversion in the manifestation of galactic structure with a nonluminous halo a luminous attenuated diameter-bulge and a superluminous (quasar or White Hole Core).
The core-bulge ratio will so reflect the eigenenergy quantum of the wormhole as heterotic Planck-Boson-String or as the magnetocharge as 1/500, being the mapping of the Planck-Length-Bounce as e=l_P.c²√Alpha onto the electron radius in e*=2R_e.c².


d) The Holographic Universe and the Information Processing

How big is the universe and could it be growing in size?
Has the Universe always existed and will it ever end or was it created and is eternal?
These are questions even little children ask their parents and their teachers.
Cosmologist throughout the history of human endeavour and science have pondered those questions and sought to derive answers.

1. Preliminaries and Introduction
2. Demetrication of General Relativity and the Deceleration Parameter
3. The Holographic Principle and the 3D-Universe as a Hologram of 4D-SpaceTime
4. Thermodynamic Entropy and Shannon Information
5. The Universal Entropy Bound (UEB) and the Holographic Entropy Bound (HB)
6. The Cosmos as Information Processor and the FRW-Universe
7. The Nodal Hubble-Constant in GR relates the entropic spacetime quanta counters in QR
8. SpaceTime Creation and a Definition for the Fundamental Demetricated Scalefactor in QR



1. Preliminaries and Introduction

The last 20 years of modern science and its discoveries by experiment and observation have now allowed a well informed convergence of data and fact to answer the perennial questions harboured in the human minds of the enquirers.
This treatise then will answer those questions in a synthesis of the accumulated data base collected by the endeavours of science. I shall make a special reference to a popular paper published by Scientific American to set the background for the 'new' scientific concepts, with whom most readers will be unfamiliar in terminology, yet about which they have heard of in peripheral contexts.

The paper is by Jacob. D. Bekenstein; Scientific American; August 2003, pages 48-55 and is entitled: "Information in the Holographic Universe". Those peripheral contexts engage the idea of higher superbrane dimensions, modular duality and the universe as a collector and processor of information, somewhat akin to mass/energy as the hardware and the information linked and derived from that processed by the programmed software as a cosmic intelligence or consciousness.

But can the universe be modelled on a computerised system? QR has shown, that the so called fundamental constants of nature are algorithmically determinable.
So the natural laws are ultimately set in a computational mode, based on simple geometrical laws and relationships. Those 'geometric' laws are themselves derived from abstract encodings of the intrinsic algorithmic symmetries or EigenStates and particularly a pentagonal supersymmetry or number patterns is directly obtained from the computational mode as number series and pattern.
This mode we call the Binary Dyad [0,1], representing for example the Inflow-Outflow VPE aka the Vortex-Potential-Energy) for something we shall determine to be discrete spacetime quanta.

The physical manifesto for this Binary Dyad or Bit is the concept of a 10-dimensional superstring, which begins as a closed or angular Eigenstate of '0' and then opens or linearises itself as the Eigenstate of '1', before recircularising back to the '0' SelfState.
This superstring with open and closed Eigenstates is called the Planck-Boson of superstring class I in a family of five superstrings of classes (I, IIA, IIB, HO(32) and HE(8x8)). If one then allows certain primary algorithms to operate as the 'cosmic intelligence' or software on the Potential Mass/Energy defined by those algorithms or programs, then the hardware of the Potential becomes Realised or manifested as the observable and measurable universe. And this manifestation must necessarily follow the simplest and minimum 'energy definition' of that of the Planck-Boson by the considerations of the above.

Subsequently, the universe's hardware consists of a continual transformation of Eigenstates defined mathematically by the parameters of primordial subtimespace algorithms manifested as the Planck-Boson in a continuous process of transforming itself across dimensions and particular selfstates known as elementary particles or wavelets. The trouble with this idea is that the subtimespace must by necessity be Undefined in the parameters of space and time and yet Defined in the 'algorithmic timespace'.

This however greatly simplifies the mathematics for the superstring classes, which must incorporate a 12-dimensional continuum of 10 spacial dimensions and 2 time dimensions for its inner mathematical necessity, sufficiency and selfconsistency. We shall reencounter those 'higher dimensions' in the discussion about the consequences of the Holographic Boundary Conditions but note here, that the present state of physics attempts to unify Quantum Theories applicable to the micro-Eigenstates with the macro-Eigenstates of classical physics as culminated in the theories of the relativities, the latter which could be considered differential-geometric.

What links those two realms of the micro/smallest with the macro/largest is however the Principle of Holography. A Hologram of a mirror, say, represents a repository of information about this 'mirror' in terms of interference patterns (which is information derived from mass/energy interaction). Now partitioning the 'mirror' (say shattering it into shards), would duplicate the entire information contained in the 'unbroken mirror' in every shard (with diminished intensity or luminosity, say).

So we consider the entire universe as the 'unbroken mirror' and partition it into the 'shards of spacetime quanta' -the universe thus consists of discrete spacetime-units as holographic projections of the universal hologram, each such projection being a deluminated image of the universe as a Hologram of One.

This Hologram of One is however defined in the Bit of the Binary Dyad [0,1], leading us back to the supermembranes of Modular Duality.
In particular this Modular Duality engages the Bit in allowing a Twosided Surface to become Onesided. This concept is well understood in the Möbius-Strip, where a rubber or ribbon, which has two distinct sides as the inner and the outer is reconnected in twisting one end through 180 degrees before reconnecting, to create a Onesided Surface which has become doubled. The extension for the Möbius-Strip is the Klein-Bottle, which derived from the Torus or Doughnut shape, enfolds space in such a way, that the 'bottle's surface' appears to be the 'bottle's volume'.
QR calls this topology of shape the differential geometry of the Möbius-Serpent transforming into the Klein-Bottle-Dragon via Möbius-Francom-Adjacency.

Those preliminaries now allow us to apply the Holographic Principle to the microstates of the superbranes as images for the macrostates of the universe. We first have to 'eliminate' the spacetime 'metrics' of the macrostates and as given in GR in a process of demetrication. This then renders the universe as a scalerelative universe, ultimately defined in parameters known as de Broglie phases.



2. Demetrication of General Relativity and the Deceleration Parameter

The demetrication of Einstein's Field equations in General Relativity (GR) leads directly to the deceleration parameter q_o in Standard Cosmology.
The formulation is:

q_o=½(Gravitational Omega Ω_o)=½M_o/M_critical → G_oM_o/λ_ps² .........[Eq.#1]​

where M_o is a Baryonic Restmass/Inertial Mass-Seedling and M_critical is the precise mass content of the universe required for perfect Euclidean flatness of zero curvature.
G_o can be considered the Gravitational Constant applicable in an universe devoid of any mass, where the gravitational constant would be identical to the inverse of the Coulomb permittivity constant in free space as G_o=4πε_o, (the derivation engages the fine-structures for the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions in the subtimespace epoch of the superbranes before the time-instanton and the Weyl-Geodesic definitions.

In that epoch the Planck-Scale of unitisation transforms in dimensionless 'wormhole' parameters via superstring classes from the Planck-Scale-Oscillation to the Weyl-Geodesic.
The Weyl-Geodesic then becomes the quantum-smeared out spacetime-quantum, also termed E_ps-Centre in QR's terminology. The E_ps quantum then defines the parameters for the classical quantum epoch given in terms of energy, mass and electropolic Coulomb charges and manifesting the GR fields; as emerging from the nonclassical and de Broglie phased State-Space of the superbrane epoch characterised in the subtimespaces of magnetocharges as inverse energy quanta for the Planck-Bosonic transformations. The wavelength λ_ps is the source-wavelength for the heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8), which in modular duality {λ_psλ_ss=1 dimensionless} with its sink-wavelength λ_ss represents the Weyl- Geodesic for the critical scale of the cosmogenesis where GR must be extended in Quantum Relativity (QR).

The source-wavelength could be called the perimeter for the wormhole satisfying the Penrosian Weyl-Nullification hypothesis at the cosmic origin for the time instantanton, (where the tidal force of the Riemann Tensor must vanish in a dewarping of all spacetimes defined by GR). The above [Eq.#1] leads directly to the inflaton of de Broglie in considering the Radius of maximum Curvature (R_max) in GR to become the Schwarzschild Solution of the GR field equations for the source-wavelenght λ_ps as the vibratory part of the supermembrane E_psE_ss (or HE(8x8)) and as applied to the gravitational Omega as the ratio between the baryonic and the critical inertial mass definitions.

For then R_max=2G_oM_o/c² => R_max.f_ps² as the de Broglie Phase-Acceleration for the Identity of c-invariance {c=λ_ps.f_ps=R_max.H_o with H_o the nodal Hubble Constant specifying the selfsame de Broglie inflaton}.The above formulations show that the microstate of supermembrane E_psE_ss can be considered the minimum Eigenstate for the Quantum Universe.
In particular the Volume of a Space-Time-Quantum is 2π²r_ps³, where r_ps=λ_ps/2π as the wormhole radius of the Weyl-Geodesic of GR.
But the universal volume now is simply a quantum summation of this and of the form 2π²R_max³.
QR calculates the numbercount of spacetimequanta for this universe (as 10D limit for R_Hubble) as an algorithmic googolplex of just over 10¹⁴⁷ and, as we shall see, just as the Holographic Entropy Bound predicted by Bekenstein.



3. The Holographic Principle and the 3D-Universe as a Hologram of 4D-SpaceTime

We now peruse Bekenstein's paper referenced before and extend its consequences by theprinciples of Quantum Relativity.
John Archibald Wheeler (Princeton University) is quoted as being one of the first physicists to consider the universe as being based upon a physics of information as primary effect and emerging energy and mass as a secondary consequence.
Information supplied to physical ingredients like a robot, allow the mechanical instrument to dynamically interact with its environment.
A ribosome in a 'living or biovital' cell is supplied amino acids to build body structures, but without DNA instruction is unable to perform its programmed function. What is the ultimate information capacity of a device defined in 'size' and 'mass'?

How much information can be stored on the universal computer chip, encoding the description for the entire universe? The Principle of Holography allows us to encode 3-dimensional information as a 2-dimensional Hologram and as the interference pattern of a two-directional 'laserlight'. One part of the laserbeam splits at a say semitransparent mirror to travel directly to a recording device (photographic plate), whilst the other part of the lightbeam reflects of the object to be recorded before forming an interference pattern at the recorder, thus creating the hologram of the 3D object as a 2D representation. Reexposure or illumination of the hologram to the same laserlight then reproduces the 3D image from the 2D record as a Holograph. John Wheeler's words are poetisized by William Blake who penned the idea that 'one can see the world in a grain of sand'.

​

So this is certainly true in holography, where the 3D grain of sand becomes a 2D hologram of it. Applied to the 'volume' of the universe as the object to be recorded; its hologram would necessarily be a mapping onto a 'surface' as a dimensionality reduced by one. Thus a 4D-universe, defined in Minkowski-Einstein spacetime and the toroidal volume specified before; would become equivalent to a 3D-Surface mapping as a hologram of this 4D-spacetime. Standard Cosmology describes our 3D-perceived universe as just such a 3-dimensional surface and calls it Riemann's Hypersphere of 4D-spacetime or a form of Poincare's 3-sphere.

Here we extend the Standard Cosmology however in proposing that this hypersphere represents a 'twisted' 3D Klein-Bottle-Dragon as the extension of the 3-Torus.
Then the twosided Möbius connection as a doubled onesided manifold is dimensionally extended as an enclosed volume 'within' becoming holographically 'added to' the potentially infinite volume 'without'.
As a simple example consider the volume 'within' the planet Earth 'added to' the volume 'without'. Here the total set of volume consists of the complements 'within' and 'without'. But the interior of the Earth is well defined and finite as the volume of Earth; whilst the exterior volume dependes on the curvature of space. If the curvature is ellipsoidal or closed or positive, then a lightbeam sent anywhere into the nightsky from your forehead, will eventually, after travelling around the perimeter of the universe return to hit the back of your head.
The universe is then spacially finite.
If the curvature is hyperbolic or open or negative, then the lightbeam will not return but diverge eternally.
The universe is then spacially infinite.
If the curvature is zero or flat, then the lightbeam will return but take an infinite amount of time to do so in an asymptotic process.

The Thuban Klein-Bottle-Dragon



{Found and shared by Allisiam}


In the Beginning was The Word of Love and the Word of Love was with the Energy of Love and so the Word of Love became the Energy of Love and became all of the Worlds of Love.
John.1.1
Finis Hominis Incere Hominidae Draconis Astrum!
"Humanity has ended, enter the Starhumanity of Dragons!"​

The experimental data (COBE, BOOMERANG, WMAP) clearly indicates a flat universe, also predicted by the Inflation models, instigated by Alan Guth (MIT) in the 1980's. QR then has found that all three cases of curvatures apply simultaneously. The 10D universe is hyperbolic and the 11D universe is ellipsoidal and superimposed they create the measured flatness of zero curvature. The 10D universe is but the holographic mapping of the 11D universe and therefore contained within it as a higher dimensional cross-section. Because the 'inside' of the 10D universe is Klein-Bottled as the 'outside', the 11D universe connects the 10D to its own Reality Image in the 12th dimension as the mapping of the Doubled Onesided Surface Mirror of 11D.
Because of the complementarity of the universal sets, the 'inside volume' is 'added to' the 'total volume' through a cyclicity of the 11D-Witten-Mirror defining the asymptotic flatness of Euclidean Zero-Curvature of flatness and as the observed and measured 4D-spacetime. This realisation has important cosmological consequences.

The universe is potentially infinite in 11 dimensions, thus allowing a continuous creation of spacetime in the form of spacetime quanta as the discrete building blocks for a 10-11-12 D spacetime triad in what is called OmniSpace in QR.
What are those dimensions and how are they connected?

The extended hypersphere definition allows us to reach the same conclusion as that given by the standard description of 11-dimensional M-Theory describing the supermembranes with a potential twosidedness of the temporal time-dimension.
In M-Theory (Witten's M=Mother=Matrix=Magic=Mystery); 9 spacial dimensions are extended to 10 spacial dimensions in allowing the 1D-superstring to manifest as a 2D-supermembrane.

In F-Theory (Vafa's F=Father); 1 timedimension becomes two-arrowed in the entropy reversal of the 11th dimension in mirror symmetry and say as a 2-dimensional 'complex plane' then becoming descriptive for the 'outside' of the 11-dimensional 'Hubble-Bubble'.
This is just what we have described with QR's Omnispace dimensions, describing the Klein-Bottle-Dragon, which forms the shape or morphology of the observed universe, residing within and without higher dimensional embedded and encompassing higher dimensional space.
Using the 12D-Vafa-Space, we reduce the 12D-continuum to the familiar 3D-continuum under agency of dimensional algorithmic rootreduction and the demetrication of Riemann's higher dimensions, say as applied to GR. QR recreates the Algorithmic NullState of the 0-Dimension as the Connector Dimension between the 1st and the 12th dimension and defined in the following.

LineSpace 1-2-3 as the Linearisation or Unfolding of the Circular Continuum of the NullState. HyperSpace 4-5-6 as the Recircularisation or Enfolding of the Linear Continuum of LineSpace. HyperSpace thus manifests as the Rotational properties of LineSpace. QuantumSpace 7-8-9 as the Relinearisation or Unfolding of HyperSpace of a combined Linear and Rotational dynamics. QuantumSpace thus manifests as the Vibrational or oscillatory properties of LineSpace. OmniSpace 10-11-12 as the Recircularisation or Enfolding of QuantumSpace as the combined dynamics of Linearity, Rotation and Vibration. OmniSpace thus manifests as the LineSpace in all of the observed and measured properties of its physical constituents (which are the Planck-Boson transformations).

Quantum Relativity so concludes that the 'higher dimensions' are Congruent with and As the LineSpace dimensions. The Time-Dimension is the Quality of the Linearisation of the Circularity and exists basically as the Precursor for the Space-Dimensions in allowing space to emerge from its own dimensionless status as Cycletime n. This is defined as dimensionless Tau(τ)-Time in GR's Curvature Radius R_C=c.dt/dτ, and so as the LightPath. In the circular OmniSpace dimensional continuum, Time does not exist (and neither space by implication).
1-2-3-(4)-5-6-(7)-8-9-(10)-11-12-(13=1=0) circularises the fourfolded OmniSpace continuum, rendering dimensionalities 1-4-7-10 as the Time-Connector dimensions 'shared' between the individuated continuae (Line, Hyper, Quantum, Omni) as the NullStates. The NullState then becomes defined in the properties of the Weyl-Geodesic, the Time-Instanton and the De Broglie Space-Inflaton in QR's cosmogenesis in the E_psE_ss heterotic supermembrane parameters.
And those definitions then must specify the limits for all and mensuration techniques applied by the 'hardware' to measure and observe itself and as programmed by the 'software'. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle must hence be finestructured in the wormhole parameters and this is precisely the case in the QR formulations.
Heisenberg's Constant: h/4π=λ_ps/[8πR_e.c³], with R_e=10¹⁰.λ_ps/360 as the superbrane form for the classical Electron Radius (R_e=R_Compton.Alpha).
Alpha is the electromagnetic Finestructure Constant and measures the interaction probability between matter and light, and as say in the photoelectric effect and the Compton Radius is the de Broglie Matter wavelength proportional to it as harmonisation between the nuclear and the atomic realms directly derived from the quantisation of the Electron Radius in terms of the wormhole or superbrane wavelength λ_ps.

So we can consider OmniSpace to Be LineSpace with the 'higher dimensions' Conifolded either in 6-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifolds or as 7-dimensional Joycian surfaces. OmniSpace is 10-11-12, which rootreduces to 1-2-3 in 1+0=1 and 1+1=2 and 1+2=3; which is the algorithmic foundation of the Bit of the Binary Dyad [0,1] as described. OmniSpace then considers dimensionalities 1=4=7=10 as the LineSpace Cardinality; dimensionalities 2=5=8=11 as the AreaSpace Cardinalities and dimensionalities 3=6=9=12 as the VolumeSpace Cardinalities.
Two universes in Bekenstein's paper and reflecting the work of other prominent researchers into the holographic identity of the universe such as Leonard Susskind (Stanford University) and subsequently by Maldacena and t'Hooft; can so have a different dimensionality (differing by one) and obeying potentially different physical laws; yet are rendered completely equivalent by the Holographic Principle.
The 5D de Sitter spacetime is empty and so highly symmetrical and expands at an accelerating rate with a repulsing 'cosmological constant'. The anti-de Sitter 5D spacetime then is empty, highly symmetrical and decelerates in an expansion with an attractive 'cosmological constant'. Whilst experimental data predicts our universe to become a 5D de Sitter universe because of an apparent cosmic acceleration measured by Saul Permutter and Brian Schmidt in 1998 in supernovae type Ia data; the Holographic Principle favours the anti-de Sitter spacetime for its asymptotic boundary, located at 'infinity'.

QR predicts the measured acceleration as apparent, because of the 'intersection' of the 10D-universe with itself in 11D as the OmniSpace Image. Because the superposition of the hyperbolic and ellipsoidal curvatures result in the measured flatness, the Riemann-Spheres in OmniSpace selfintersect and result in 'overlapping' spacetimes, which can be analysed by cosmological redshift data, which is required to be 'corrected' for the intersecting redshift intervals. Needless to say, many present controversies regarding 'redshifts' are solved in superposing the higher dimensional analysis centred on an epoch specifying redshift called the Arpian-Variation Maximum by QR.

The redshift interval in question also coincides and elucidates a measurement for an Alpha-Finestructure-Constant-Dip through John Webb (UNSW), who measured quasar spectra of hydrogen absorption lines on Mauna Kea, Hawaii with the 10m Keck telescope in 1998.
And the mathematical analysis for the Holographic Principle is in correlation with QR.

A 5D anti-de Sitter spacetime is the object and is mapped as a 4D Minkowski flat spacetime as its own holograms
The periphery of the 5D anti-de Sitter spacetime is its 'Boundary' as the 4D Riemann Hypersphere.
In OmniSpace however, the 5D is also the 11D, combining the 'Rotational' Degrees of Freedom of HyperSpace with the 'Vibrational' Degrees of Freedom of 8D QuantumSpace to reconstitute the 2D LineSpace as the 'Quantisational' Degrees of Freedom of 11D OmniSpace. In other words, the 'infinite' boundary for the 5D anti-de Sitter spacetime is also the 11D Witten-Mirror, but now bounded by the Hubble-Friedmann-Radius of maximum curvature as R_max, calculated by QR to be 16.9 Billion lightyears.

The 5D anti-de Sitter spacetime is ruled by 10D superstrings, again implying the 11D identification and the conformal mappings of the 4D spacetime onto the 5D spacetime relate the entropies of the two universes to each other.
It is found, that a Black Hole in 5D is equivalent to 'Hot Radiation' in 4D as the hologram of the Black Hole's entropy as thermodynamic entropy.
The source entropy of outflow in 4D is found to precisely match the sink-entropy of inflow in 5D.



4. Thermodynamic Entropy and Shannon Information

Consider a glass of water.
Thermodynamic Entropy seeks to describe the number of permutations, which are possible between the smallest constituents which comprise the isolated system (glass of water), without changing the overall state of that system. The 'glass of water' then remains invariant macroscopically, but its microscopic state of flux becomes specified or measured by its entropy as the number of possible rearrangements of those smallest constituents, may those be molecules, atoms, subatomic particles or superstrings.
Thermodynamic Entropy is thus measured as effect of Avogadro's Constant (N_Av), relating the 'amount of substance' as molarity in association with Boltzmann's Constant (k).
The universal Gas-Constant (R) at STP (Standard Temperature and Pressure) so is R=kN_Av.
Formal Information Theory originated in 1948 with American applied mathematician Claude E. Shannon, who introduced Bit-Entropy as a measure for Information Content.

Of course, we have already associated the Bit as an algorithmic representation for the superstrings; so Shannon Information automatically relates QR to a measurement of entropy. How many Bits or Binary Digits are required to encode a certain amount of information?

Every modern communications device, ranging from cellular phones to modems to CD players rely on Shannon Entropy as a 'counting of the Bits'. Thermodynamic Entropy is basically Energy/Temperature which has the units of (k); whilst Shannon Entropy is algorithmic and dimensionless.
A Silicon Computer Chip has dimensions of 1cubic centimetre and a mass of less than a gram.

If this chip carries one Gigabyte of data (1 Byte=8 Bits), then the Shannon Entropy is about 10¹⁰, whilst the Thermodynamic Entropy (at STP) is about 10²³ for common unitisation.
This vast difference is a consequence of the many different arrangements the molecules and atoms with their electrons can assume in their 'Degrees of Freedom' of the before described modes of translation, rotation and vibration.
Should we now reduce the atoms of the chip down to the superstrings, then the thermodynamic entropy would increase exponentially, yet this can be ignored in thermodynamics because the individual quarks and leptons remain in a sense invariant for the counting of the atomic states under consideration.
But under the relativistic conditions of the Quantum Big Bang Cosmogenesis and the Creation of the superstrings, all permuation states must be considered and this leads us into the Thermodynamic Entropy of Black Holes and the Limits For Information Density.



5. The Universal Entropy Bound (UEB) and the Holographic Entropy Bound (HB)

John Wheeler emphasized in the 1970's that the information 'falling' into a Black Hole seems to violate the second law of thermodynamics, stating that any isolated system must increase its entropy or state of disorder.
This is the case, when one considers a Black Hole to be a highly ordered system, just specified by its size and mass in the Schwarzschild solution obtained in GR's demetrication.
The work of Stephen Hawking (Cambridge University) and Demetrious Christodoulou (then at Princeton under Wheeler's guidance), together with that of Jacob Bekenstein (then under Wheeler and now at Hebrew University of Jerusalem) showed however that Black Holes must possess thermodynamic properties, as their characteristic size or Event Horizon must always increase in area under merger.

Thus Bekenstein proposed in 1972, that the Black Hole's Entropy is proportional to its Surface Area of its Event Horizon.
Thus the 'lost' entropy of the infalling matter or information is transformed into Black Hole entropy as function of the Black Hole's Temperature.
So even in the case of a 'shrinking' Black Hole (emitting Hawking Radiation in its 'getting hotter'), the emergent radiation retransmits the previously 'lost' entropy as 'found' disorder.
In 1986 Rafael D. Sorkin (Syracuse University) applied the 'Generalised Second Law' (GSL) in showing that it must be valid for all Black Hole processes down to the superstring level.

Hawking's Radiation process then specifies the proportionality between entropy and the Black Hole's Surface Area as precisely ¼A, where area A is measured and quantised in Planck-Areas A_P, with {A_P=G_oh/2πc³=l_P² and l_P the Planck-Length}.
The entropy of a Black Hole the mass of the Earth (~6x10²⁴ kg) would be contained in the Earth's Schwarzschild Radius of about 1.5 cm and a surface area of so 2.8x10^-3 square meters, which comprises about 6.5x10⁶⁶/4 =1.6x10⁶⁶ Bits as entropy counter.

The thermodynamic entropy for 1 litre of water (10^-3 cubic metres) is about R/k or 6x10²³ Bits and it would take a 'cube of water' with a side of 1.3x10¹⁴ meters to match the Earth's entropy as a Black Hole equivalent just 3cm across.
This standard for water is used to define the Universal Entropy Bound or UEB.
We now consider the Holographic Entropy Bound or HB in any energy or matter distribution as a spherical region of space as a Black Hole equivalence in inducing the contained matter distribution to collapse to its boundary of the event horizon, quantised in Planck Areas as the Limit of Information Density given in Bits and representing the mass-content as Black Hole parameter.

In such a scenario, the Shannon Entropy is equal to the Thermodynamic Entropy as the HB. So in adding more and more computer chips together, one obtains Entropy proportional to the Surface Area of the computer chips 'pile' and Not to the Volume of the 'pile'.
This counterintuitive result is a consequence of the Event Horizon specifying the 'breakdown' of the matter distributions and not the volume it occupies.

The Bekenstein paper referenced tabulates the following comparative data for the UEB and the HB with the size of the distributions plotted against the information capacity (in Bits) to give the linear proportions:

Human Chromosome....................(1 micron, 10⁹ Bits); UEB=10^{23 Bits} & HB=10⁵⁸ Bits
Music CD......................................(10cm, 10¹⁰ Bits); UEB=10⁴⁰ BITS & HB=10⁶⁸ Bits
Liter of Water as UEB Standard..(10cm, 10²³ Bits); UEB=10⁴⁰ Bits & HB=10⁶⁸ Bits
Library of Congress......................(10m, 10¹⁵ Bits); UEB=10⁵² Bits & HB=10⁷³ Bits
Internet..........................................(6500km, 10¹⁶ Bits); UEB=10⁷⁵ Bits & HB=10⁸⁵ Bits
Intersection of UEB and HB........(10¹² m, 10¹⁰⁰ Bits);UEB=HB=10¹⁰⁰ Bits
Universe (projected).....................(10²⁶ m, 10¹⁵⁰ Bits).

One should now point out, that the Bekenstein Intersection for the UEB and the HB has a precise counterpart in Quantum Relativity. In QR the microscopic realm for the subatomic template is mapped onto the macroscopic world of the cosmogenesis, after the subatomic quark quantum geometry has itself become magnified from the supermembrane epoch as exemplified in the quantisation of the classical Electron Radius in terms of the parameters of the Weyl-Geodesic.
In particular, the cosmogenesis maps the neutron's beta decay onto the evolution of the 10D universe as the hologram of the 11D universe.

Thus the time-and size-scales for the neutron are matched to what are known as neutron stars in their primordial form of prototypical dineutron- or ylem-stars.
So called pulsars and magnetars are subsequent generations for the ylem stars.
In particular, the ylemic evolution defines the Higgs Bosonic Blueprint for the restmass induction of the quark-leptonic families of the Standard Model in Particle Physics.

The Higgs-Bosonic template is characterised by certain spacetime markers, which allow the nucleonic differentiation into quarks and leptons in a neutrinoic kernel, an inner mesonic ring and an outer leptonic ring.
The Inner Mesonic Ring maps say markers G and F and the Outer Leptonic Ring maps marker E; all as spacetime quanta counters.
One can now easily deduce that there will be an intersection of the Riemann-Hyperspheres at those marker points (which were set in the de Broglie inflaton).
In the subatomic-nucleon template, this intersection corresponds to a precise formulation for the neutrinoic kernel of the Higgs Bosonic Blueprint and defines the Tau-(anti)neutrino inertial mass induction at centred on 3.00 eV (electronvolt).
The formulation for this restmass induction is given in the Scalar Higgs (anti)neutrino as part of the Higgs Bosonic template:

n_Higgs=(λ_ps.m_e/2π.R_e){E/G-E/F}=0.052 eV...........[Eq. #2]
​

and where m_e is the effective mass for the electron.

This result was experimentally confirmed in the Kamiokande, Japan neutrino data of 1998.
The experiments measured the massinduction difference for muonic neutrinos hitting the detectors from two different colinear directions, one of those neutrino pathways travelling tthrough the
Earth's interior and the other impeding directly from the sky.

This is the mean of the G and F markers in the cosmology, where the corresponding distance scales are 3.39x10¹¹ m and 3.45x10¹¹ m respectively, with marker E setting 3.44x10¹⁴ m.

For a local starsystem containing the planet Earth and centred on the star RahSol; those distances refer to the Asteroid Belt at say 2.2 Astronomical Units (AU) from the Sun and to the Kuiper-Belt as extent of the Solar System at 2,200 AU, bounded by the Oort Cloud in the linearisation factor of 2π further out.

Hence the entropy bound equivalence verifies QR in proposing that at the scale of the asteroid belt, the cosmogenesis massinduced the scalar Higgs neutrino template as the Minimum scale for inertial mass and predicting that the Universe as an entity is representable as a Black Hole equivalence from that minimum condition onwards.
Now this is precisely what QR has found in beginning the Neutron Star evolution as the prototypical ylem stars at those spacetime markers of the accumulated spacetime quanta, which comprise the hypersphere volumes in the cosmogenesis.

QR has derived a beautiful formulation for those ylem-stars as mass-independent protostars, with the ylemic radii depending only on subatomic parameters as a function of the universe's temperature in its Planck-Boson evolution as a macroquantised Black Body Radiator.
The formulation equates the equilibrium condition between the thermal outward pressure with the gravitational inward pressure and is, with m_c the prototypically finestructured nucleon-mass:

R_ylem=√{kT.R_e³/G_o.m_c²}......... [Eq.#3]​

But from the ylemic times, which map the neutron's beta decay in the G-F interval of 19 seconds from about 2 minutes to 19 minutes of the timeinstanton at the 18 minute markers; the universe's Black Hole evolution became initialised in the ylemic protostars which would allow further stellar generations to evolve and transform into neutron stars, magnetars and Black Holes as a function of their masses and centred on the Chandrasekhar white dwarf upper limit of 1.5 solar masses, which is a dimensionless form of the wormhole source-frequency fps and links to the solar cycles of the magnetic fields generated by spinning masses as magnetocharged electricity forming mass equivalences.



6. The Cosmos as Information Processor and the FRW-Universe

The theoretical ultimate information capacity for any massive spherical energy distribution so Increases only with its Surface Area and not its Volume. Because volume increases more rapidly as surface area, the Black Hole limit shows that if the mass of a star collapses under its own gravity, then this is equivalent to information being mapped from its 3D eigenstate onto its 2D eigenstate in a dimensional reduction forming the hologram of the higher dimension in the lower dimension.

The Holographic Principle was first proposed by Gerard t'Hooft (University of Utrecht) and Leonard Susskind in 1993 and fully supports (and explains) the Black Hole evolutionary scenario under discussion.
The information content given by a 3D system of physical interaction can be described by a 'surface physics' operating in the 2D boundary of the 3D system.
In the nomenclature of QR then, the information content of the 12D-Vafa-Sphere is mapped onto its own boundary-mirror of the 11D-Witten-Sphere from without or within.
The nature of the Möbian connectivity however adds the smaller subspace of the 10D universe as the information mapping onto the same hologram of 11D as the demetricated form of supermembrane or M-theory.

Juan Maldacena (then at Harvard University), first conjectured the full majesty of superstring theory in 1997 in proposing the anti-de Sitter 5D universe, which was later confirmed by Edward Witten (Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, New Jersey) and Steven S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov and Alexander M Polyakov (all of Princeton University).
The physics at the boundary of the higher spacetime would be mathematically equivalent to the physics of the higher spacetime; the entropy of a Black Hole in 5D would become the thermodynamic entropy of hot radiation in 4D.

Any universe then can be considered to transform its Eigenstate as an Information Processor.
The energy/mass content of such a universe interacts and maps those interactions in a space defined as volume onto its periphery as a bounding surface.

The energy/mass distributions form indeed the 'hardware' of the cosmic computer system, which is programmed by the 'software' of the universal intelligence, called the 'Laws of Nature'.
Those 'Laws of Nature' are however founded upon algorithmic processes by the 'writer of the programs' often called the Logos or the Word.

Since the Logos is intinsic to the Hologram of One, partitioning itself into the 'shards' of the Many; any One of the Many is also part of that Logos.
Subsequently, the 'program writers' are all pieces of 'shard', with not all those pieces necessarily being aware of their membership of the Club of the Hologram of One and the fraternity of the Logos. But by and through this Logos, the universe created itself in Möbian connectivity with the One being Two in One.

Any Experience by any of the 'shards' becomes a 'shared' experience due to that fraternity of the 'shards' and the Hologram of One.
This can and has been rigorously defined in QR as a propagation of Experience-Factors and as
the EigenStates of the Binary Dyads [0,1] in the foundations of the pentagonal supersymmetry underpinning the cosmogenesis in what QR terms Awareness-Triplets of the form [Old EigenState, Experience, New Eigenstate] with the New SelfState reiterating as the next Old SelfState.

So we know that the universe is self-programming itself through the 'shards' experiences as a form of information. The theoretical ultimate information capacity for any massive spherical energy distribution so Increases only with its Surface Area and not its Volume. Because volume increases more rapidly as surface area, the Black Hole limit shows that if the mass of a star collapses under its own gravity, then this is equivalent to information being mapped from its 3D eigenstate onto its 2D eigenstate in a dimensional reduction forming the hologram of the higher dimension in the lower dimension.

This information accumulation is forever growing as the shared experiences mapped as information onto the universal boundary of the 11-dimensional Mother-Space.
Is there a limit as to how big the universe can become?
If the universe is infinite then there is no limit to the accumulation of information, but then the Holographic Bound as described is inapplicable for any universe not representable as a Black Hole as depicted.

The present Standard Model for Cosmology is based on Einstein's Field Equations with the three case scenario depending on the mass/information content of the universe as a function of its curvature, as we have seen previously.
The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe is said to be infinite, of hyperbolic curvature and will go on to expand eternally, eventually fading out as the nuclear fuel of successive stellar generations becomes exhausted in an ever growing dilation and diffusion of the entropy.
This is termed the 'Heat-Death' of the FRW-universe.

In this case, say of an infinite accelerating expansion, the Black Body model must break down and the Holographic Bound cannot be applied.
But we have already seen, that the FRW universe is but the 10D universe in QR, which is negatively curved but because of its Möbian connectivity, it is Bounded by Itself as the hologram of its 11-dimensional Mother-Space, which is of positive curvature enfolding the C-Space of the 10-dimensional superstrings as 11-dimensional supermembranes.
The 10D-FRW universe is the C-Space of the F-Space and the Child to the Father reflected in the Mother.
The negative curvature of the C-Space also becomes the hyperbolic curvature of the F-Space in the reversal of the Entropy Arrow of Time.
If the 10D-C-Space is considered convex and imaging 12D-F-Space, then the 11D-M-Space must be concave; just as a doughnut or torus carries both curvatures in the one topological multiconnected form.
The inner doughnut hole appears concave to an observer situated at the centre, all sides around himherself curving away from herhimself.
But the outer and larger circular enclosure appears convex in the spherical inner surface, which could encompass the doughnut.
The convexity of the 10D-universe then becomes the asymptotic expansion of the FRW-cosmos in the predicted and experimentally observed perfect Euclidean flatness.

Were there only 10 dimensions, then the universe would be a true FRW-universe of infinite extent and accelerated expansion.
But because there are 11 dimensions, the FRW-universe becomes finite with a decelerating expansion as required, the observed redshift dependent cosmic acceleration being the effect of the intersection of the C-Space convexity with the M-Space concavity.

And the breakdown of the Holographic Bound for sufficiently large regions then became appropriately addressed by a topological form of Quantum Relativity. In 1999 Raphael Bousso (then at Stanford University) conjectured the Bousso-Bound to overcome the limitations of the UEB and the t'Hooft-Susskind form of the HB; say when the isolated system undergoes rapid evolutionary change, such as gravitational collapse into a Black Hole.

Bousso considered a simple-connected 2D surface (there are only three such topologies which deform a plane into a same class manifold in the Catenoid, the Helicoid and the Hollow Sphere with an opening to infinity say) and applied the property of convergence in emitting imaginary light rays from every point of the spherical inner surface.
Bousso then conjectured, that the entropy encoded by this inner surface (say as A/4 measured in Planck-Areas) could not exceed the entropy of the matter and the radiation of the light rays before crossing. Bousso so counts the entropy not at any region at a certain time; but rather counts the entropies of different locales at many times.

But this is our oscillating and cyclic 11D universe intersecting itself in the asymptotically expanding 10D universe again.
The Steady State of the 11D Witten mirror forms the boundary or Event Horizon of maximum curvature for the expanding universe in 10D; the entire scenario becoming imaged in the 12D Vafa-Space as the Reflection or Shadow Universe in the M-Space of the Mother's supermembranes.
QR now extends the Bousso Bound in the QR bound of the spacetime-quanta googolplex as the decisive entropy counter for the universe, before approximated by Bekenstein as of the order of around 10¹⁵⁰.



7. The Nodal Hubble-Constant of GR relates the entropic spacetime quanta counters in QR

The QR-Holographic Bound calculates as Z=[2π.R_max/λ_ps]³~10¹⁴⁷ Bits with the volume of a spacetime quantum given in λ_ps³/4π~7.96x10^-68 m³.

Every 16.9 billion years, the nodal intersection of the c-invariant 11D-universe Activates the QR-HB-entropy counter and the 11D cosmos collapses its Information Content onto the nodes, which form the Hologram of the 10D-spacetime mapped nodally onto the 11D-Witten-Mirror.

As the universe is 19.11 billion years old, the first nodal mapping occurred so 2.2 billion years ago; when a certain sentience began to evolve on a certain localised hologram of this cosmogenesis; and a cosmic intelligence which would one day become enabled to reconstruct the cosmogenesis of its own identity as the holographic image of its own creation in co-creatorship.
This sentience therefore would Remember its fraternity with the Logos of Creation.

Because of the Klein-Bottledness, the nodal resonances extend the Bousso Bound in bidirectionality, one in holographic reflection and the other in holographic refraction.
The inside defines a multivalued and multiconnected 11-dimensional continuum of supermembranes bounded in the 10-dimensional massparametric hologram and the outside continues to grow in 'volume' by adding spacequanta in the creation of new space as the 11D-expansion towards potential infinity and the old anti-de Sitter boundary.

Using a calibrated Mean-Alignment-Time or MAT of say November 5th, 1996 at 00:00 +11UCT; this number of wormhole quanta is:
2p²R_Hubble³x(n/MAT=1.132419321...)/2p²R_wormhole³=8.04999159x10⁷⁹/7.95774715x10^-68 =1.0115917x10¹⁴⁷ at MAT
and adding wormhole quanta every second from its ('Eternal Void Energy Potential' from Abstraction Space of the MATHIMATIA aka the Tetragrammaton I AM THAT I AM aka the pentagrammaton I AM THAT AM I) due to the expansion of the Omniverse from its protoversal seed into Eternity from its reciprocated Nulltime.

The volume of the universe calculates as a function of quantized time and space and as an effect of the frequency quantum of the cosmogenesis defining the wormhole Big Bang singularity.

V(t) =6p²c∫R² dt = 6p²cR_Hubble²∫n² dt = 6p²c³∫t² dt for the integration interval from 'Big Bang Time' t=t_ps=1/f_ps to expansion time coordinate t=t and for dR=cdt and R(n)=nR_Hubble and n=H_ot for dn/dt=H_o.

V(t=t_ps) = 2p²c³{t_ps³ - t_ps³} = 0 for the time quantum t_ps as the wormhole frequency f_ps

V(2t_ps) = 2p²c³{2³ - 1}t_ps³ as the first finite volume after time and space began.

V(3t_ps) = 2p³c³{2³ - 1}t_ps³ as the second such volume and defining the size of the universe for cycle time coordinate n=H_o(3t_ps) for generalised n=H_ot and dn/dt=H_o

V(nt_ps) = 2p²c³{n³ - 1}t_ps³ as generalisation for expansion time t=n/H_o

V(1)=V(3x10³⁰.t_ps) = 2p²c³{27x10⁹⁰ - 1}t_ps³ = 2p²l_ps³{27x10⁹⁰ - 1} because c=f_psl_ps and showing the quantization of the volume and size of the universe as a simple count of the unitary wormholes of frequency f_ps=1/t_ps=3x10³⁰ cycles per second for the universe being 1 second old.

2p²l_ps³ = {8p³}.2p²r_ps³ then defines the Number of wormholes at any expansion time t as:

N_Wormholes = c³t³/l_ps³ = {Lightpath X=ct}³/{Wormhole Perimeter}³ = {Wormhole Source Frequency x Expansion Time Coordinate}³ = {f_ps.t}³

Modular string-membrane duality defines: r_ps = l_ps/2p for r_ps = 1/r_ss = 2p/l_ps = 2pl_ss for {8p³} → 1​

The expanding universe topologically and geometrically represents a 3D-Surface V₃=dV₄/dR=2p²R_Hubble³ from the toroidal Riemann sphere in multi dimensional hyperspace V₄=½p²R⁴.

The increase in wormhole quanta therefore multiplies the 2D reduction of the 3D surface area by lightspeed c to add a 'volume shell' for the volume added and integrated over the time parameters.

dV/dt=dV/dn.dn/dt = (6p²n²R_Hubble³).(H_o) with H_o=c/R_Hubble = l_ps.f_ps/R_Hubble for the scale ratio identity for the micro-macro quantization H_o/f_ps=n_ps=H_o.t_ps=l_ps/R_Hubble.


For the Quantum Big Bang: t=t_ps and so N_Wormholes = {f_ps.t}³ ={f_ps/f_ps}³ = 1 as the wormhole unit for V(t_ps = 0 INFLATING l_ps to R_Hubble and the dimensionally reduced Volume V₃ = 2p²R_Hubble³ as the 11D boundary for the 10D asymptotic wormhole seedling to expand into. The expansion of the universe is both cyclic and asymptotic.
The 10D open hyperbolic and negatively curved topology describes a 'Seedling Protoverse' which asymptotically approaches but never reaches its 11-dimensional mirror boundary and a boundary which is itself expanding in a particular cyclicity of the wormhole evolution.
A massless 'Strominger Black Hole' oscillates in a 4 Trillion year 'recharge' cyclicity between the micro- and macro quantum self states.
This cyclicity is superposed onto the nodal cosmic frequency oscillations of the 'Heartbeat' of the universe at c-invariant lightspeed, one 'heartbeat' taking a full nodal oscillation of the 'Hubble Constant' varying in tandem with the Hubble Oscillation as the R_Hubble/wormhole oscillations and as the definition of dimensionless cycletime coordinate n_ps.

This scale oscillation differs from the Hubble Oscillation in terms of the Black Hole Schwarzschild metric of the curvature radius R_c=2G_oM_{Black Hole}/c² in the Mass difference between the 11D-Mother Black Hole and a Seedling 'Daughter Black Hole' known as the Sarkar Black Hole of supergalactic gravitational homogeneity further described in the 'dark energy' and 'dark matter' or 'missing mass' encountered in the cosmologies for a Euclidean flat universe of zero curvature.

In terms of the multi dimensional universe, this flatness is the consequence of the hyperbolic asymptotic cosmology being encompassed by a 11D closed spherical-ellipsoidal and positively curved topology of the 'Inflation Mirror' so producing the overall flatness as a consequence of the toroidal geometry of the Riemannian hypersphere. An observer at the center of a Horn- or Vortex Torus would experience the negatively curved space at the centre as a volume 2p²R_Hubble³=2pR_Hubble.pR_Hubble² for radius r=R, but also experience its encompassment in a sphere of volume with radius r=2R and so a volume of 4p(2R)³/3 or 32pR³/3, being greater than the volume of the observable universe by a factor of 16/3p.
The convexity of the encompassing 'Omniverse' so cancels the Concavity of the lower dimensional 'Multiverse' in phaseshifted Universes, centred on the Protoversal Seedling Universe and not parallel as a Many World Multiverse.

​

The de Broglie Inflaton phase acceleration is given by a_dB=R_Hubble.f_ps² for the tachyon velocity v_dB=R_Hubble.f_ps for the general matter wave speed expression:
v_phase=(frequency).(wavelength)=(mc²/h).(h/mv_group)=c²/v_group > c for all v_group < c using E=hf=mc² for wave momentum mv_Group=h/l=hf/v_group

For the Quantum Big Bang: t=t_ps and so N_Wormholes = {f_ps.t}³ = {f_ps/f_ps}³ =1

For 1 second after creation: t=1 and so N_Wormholes = {f_ps.1}³ = {f_ps}³ = 2.7x10⁹¹

For the Hubble Node: t= 1/H_o and so N_Wormholes = {f_ps.t}³={f_ps/H_o}³ = {f_ps.R_Hubble/c}³ = {R_Hubble/l_ps}³ = 1/n_ps³ = {R_Hubble.10²²}³ = 4.078173...x10¹⁴⁴

For MAT-time: t= n_MAT/H_o and so N_Wormholes = {f_ps.t}³={f_ps.1.132419321./H_o}³ = 5.92226037...x10¹⁴⁴

For the present time: t= n_present/H_o and so N_Wormholes = {f_ps.t}³={f_ps.(t_MAT + 567,993,600)}³ = {f_ps.(6.030795167x10¹⁷)}³ = 5.92226039...x10¹⁴⁴
for n_Present = H_o{t_MAT + 567,993,600} = H_o{6.030795161...x10¹⁷ + 567,993,600} = H_o{6.030795167x10¹⁷} = 1.80923855x10²⁶/1.59767545x10²⁶ = 1.132419322

(As the time from November 5th, 1996 00:00+11UCT to November 5th, 2014 00:00+11UCT and as 18 civil years or 6574 civil mean solar days or approximately 6574x24x3600=567,993,600 seconds added to the Mean Alignment Time of the Dragon calibration)

The 'Heartbeat' of the 'Mother Black Hole' AS the spacetimed protoversal seed for the Omniverse is defined in the Hubble Frequency as a 'Outbreath' semicycle to be followed by an 'Inbreath' semicycle, which technically is called the Nodal Hubble Constant defined by the 'speed of light' divided by the total extent of the Omniverse in 11 Dimensions as the 'Hubble Radius' or as H_o=c/R_Hubble=300,000,000/1.59767545x10²⁶=1.87772805x10^-18 cycles per cosmic second.}

Z = {2pR_Hubble/l_ps}³={2p/n_ps}³ as the Number of Bits as wormhole quanta contained in the 11D boundary for the 10D Seedling Protoverse for cycle time n=1 and the nodal Hubble Constant H_o=c/R_Hubble and with n_ps=l_ps/R_Hubble

Y = {2pf_ps.t}³ = 8p³{f_ps.t}³ = {w_ps.t}³ = {n.w_ps/H_o}³ as the Number of Bits as spacetime quanta for time t=n/H_o

Y/Z = {n.n_ps.w_ps/2pH_o}³ = {n.f_psl_ps/H_oR_Hubble}³ = {n.c/c}³ = n³ as the Fraction or proportionality of the 11D Omniverse relative to its Seedling Protoverse Boundary

X = (Lightpath.t²/11D Boundary)Z = {ct.t²/R_Hubble}Z = {H_o.t³}Z = {n³.H_o/H_o²}.{8p³n_ps³ = {2p.n/n_ps}³.1/H_o²

Y/X = {n.w_ps/H_o}³.{n_ps/(2p.n)}³.H_o² = {f_ps.n_ps/H_o}³.H_o² = {c/(R_Hubble.H_o)}³.H_o² = H_o² = 2G_oM_critical/R_Hubble³


Every second then, an added 3D volume of (2p²n²R_Hubble³).(H_o) = 2p²cn²R_Hubble²~1.51x10⁶².n² cubic meters in a wormhole bit count of H_oZ.n²=N_n=(c.n²R_Hubble²)/r_ps³=1.90x10¹²⁹.n² spacetime quanta 'bits' are calculated to add to the number of activated spacetime quanta with 1/H_o=R_max/c the Hubble-Time as frequency for the universal Hubble-Oscillation in dimensionless cycletimes n=H_ot and dn/dt=H_o.
This amounts to about 1.94x10⁶² m³ of 'new volume' every second for the present time coordinate of n_Present=1.1324... (the universe's HB-boundary volume is so 8.1x10⁷⁹ m³ for comparison).

This also Activates 1.90x10¹²⁹/e*=3.8x10¹²⁶ Joules of sourcesink energyflux every second under the guiding parameter of the LightMatrix of c-invariance for the Vortex Potential Energy density VPE-source energy quantum:

Vacuum_seq = 4pE_ps/l_ps = 1.25664x10⁶⁷ Joules/m³ .

This sourcesink energy is distributed across the surface boundary of the Event Horizon comprising the entire universe in the NewSpace Creation of Potential Information.
So as John Archibald Wheeler first proposed (Jacob Bekenstein dedicated the referenced paper to John Wheeler) in the 1970's:

"Information is the basic ingredient and constituent of the universe".

This sourcesink energy represents the manifested vacuum or zero-point energy of the E_psE_ss supermembrane as the modular dual BlackBody/WhiteBody Radiator/Absorber.
In QR it is termed Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE.
This is rather different to the manifested and realised information of the hologramic 10D universe however.

After 1 second into the Birth of the Universe, the Potential Information Content[/I] is of the order of 1.9x10¹²⁹ Bits; but the 10D universe has 'only' expanded to the radial=LightPath of c=300,000 km and a 3D-Volume (as a 3D-surface boundary of a 4D-Volume) of 5.33x10²⁶ cubic metres or Y=8π³c³/λ_ps³=[2πf_ps³=[ω_ps³~6.70x10⁹³ spacetime quanta as the cube of the angular velocity as the source-eigen quantum state.

The ratio of the Y/X spacetime quanta counters is however precisely given as the Schwarzschild solution for the demetricated form of Einstein's GR field equations in the Curvature Radius:
R_Curvature=R_Hubble=2G_oM_critical/c² for the critical density r_critical = M_critical/2p²R_Hubble³ = c²/4p²G_oR_Hubble² = H_o²/4p²G_o:

Y/X = H_o² = 3.5x10^-36 = 4π²G_o.r_critical = 2G_o.M_critical/R_max³............[Eq.#4]​

Since H_o represents the Universe's EigenFrequency, the 11D spacetime quanta creation must relate to the oscillatory cyclicity of the defining M-Space intersectring the C-Space one dimension lower and in the 10D/4D Riemannian Hypersphere With the Calabi-Yau Manifold of toroidal derivative.



8. SpaceTime Creation and a Definition for the Fundamental Demetricated Scalefactor of QR

The demetricated form for the Scale Factor in GR is a function of cycletime n and describes the asymptotic expansion of the 10D-Universe as a consequence of algorithmic definitions and relating to the definition for the transcendental masternumber of the natural exponent 'e'.
QR derives this in the following manner.

The Cosmic Wavefunction is the following Differential Equation:

dB/dT + αB(n) = 0; α being the Electromagnetic Finestructure as the probability of light-matter interaction (~1/137).

This has a solution: B(n) = B_o.exp[-α.T(n)]; B_o=2e/hA from QR boundary conditions defining:

T(n)=n(n+1) as the Feynman Path-Summation of particular histories under the pentagonal supersymmetry given in the (Euler) identity:

XY=X+Y=-1=i²=exp[iπ] and lim [n→X]{T(n)}=1

This allows the Normalisation of the ]Y]² wavefunction to sum to unity in B(n)=(2e/hA).exp[-α.n(n 1)] with Functional Riemann Bound FRB=-1/2, centred on the interval [Y,...-1,...-X,...-1/2,...(X-1),...0,...X].

Interval [Y,-1] sets F-Space; interval [-1,0] sets M-Space with uncertainty interval [-X,(X-1)] and interval [0,n) sets the C-Space, encompassing OmniSpace.
n<0 is imaginary as real reflection of real n>0 of the C-Space, metrically defined at the coordinate n=0 mapping n=n_ps, which is the instanton t_ps=f_ss=1/f_ps.

Cycletime n is defined in GR as dimensionless Tau(τ)-Time in curvature radius R_C=c.dt/dτ for the pathlength of x=ct and become dn/dt=H_o, n=H_ot in QR, with H_o the nodal HubbleConstant defined in c=H_oR_max=λ_ps.f_ps.

The Feynman Path so sums both negative and positive integers as: -n......-3...-2...-1...0...1...2...3......n =T(n) in absolute value to double the infinities as the entropy reversal of lightpath x=c.t=(-c)(-t) in the Möbius Property of the 4 worlds as outlined in the 13 dimensions of the time connectors.

Cantor Cardinality Aleph-Null is thus Unitised in Aleph-All, counting infinities as if they were integers of the Feynman Path.
This allows the Feynman interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as alternative to the formulations of Schrödinger (fermionic 1/2 spin) and Klein-Gordon (bosonic integral spin) as timeindependent and timedependent (free particle form inconsistent with SR in Schrödinger in 1st order t & 2nd order x), formulations respectively.

The units of B(n) are 1/J, that is Inverse Energy, with A² an algorithmic constant defining Current-Squared and 2e/h the Josephson Constant in Amperes/Joules.

B(n) as the universal cosmic wavefunction describes the universe as a potentially infinite collection of 'frozen' wormhole eigenstates at n=0.
The timeinstanton 'unfreezes' one such eigenstate and activates the protoverse as described elsewhere in this message cluster.
This then allows the 'Mappings' of the C-Space 'real time n>0' from the F-Space of the 'imaginary time n<-1' under utility of the M-Space interval as 'mirror-space'.

QR unifies electromagnetic and gravitational finestructures in F-Space using the Planck-Length-Oscillation l_P√α=e/c² from the subplenum definition as the 'Bounce of the Planck-Length'.

This yields the decisive mapping for the B(n):

Coulomb Charge e = l_P√α.c² ↔ 2R_e.c² = e* (StarCoulomb Charge).......... [Eq.#5]​

But the StarCoulomb is Inverse Energy by definition of the vibratory part of the modular dual heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8)=E_psE_ss.

E_ps=hf_ps=hc/λ_ps=(m_e/2e).√[2πG_o/αhc]=m_e/{2em_P√α}=1/e*.......... [Eq.#6]​

m_P is the Planck-Mass and G_o is the initiatory Gravitational Constant, defined in the FineStructure-Relation, which defines the Planck-Length-Oscillation in the unification of electromagnetic interactions with those of gravitational permittivity:

G_o=4πε_o=1/30c with dimensionless c-ether constant [c]unified.

This defines the MacArthur Gamma as: "LightMass-Constant" LMC=γ_Mac =30[c]unified.

Thus Quantum Relativity is defined in the charge mappings between the OmniSpace dimensions; F maps magnetocharges e* onto electrocharges e under agency of the 11D-Witten Mirror, which is a Onesided Surface möbian connecting 10D to 12D.
The all encompassing source energy quantum is the E_ps-Gauge Boson, which manifests as the Gauge mediator for the four elemental interactions, suppressing the weak interaction in a primary triplicity however to allow the Higgs Restmass Induction mechanism to proceed in the defining qualities of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).

Now T(n)=n²+n, with first derivative dT/dn=2n+1 and define the Radius of Curvature as R(n)=dT/dn.
Set T(n)=R_max² - R²(n) for the Radius of Curvature R(n), bounded in R_max.

Represent the Feynman-Operator dT/dn=R_max/R(n) as the differential for the asymptotic approach and write T(n)={R_max+ R(n)}.{R_max-R(n)}=1=(n+1/2)²-(1/4).

Hence R_max=[n+1/2] and R(n)=[1/2] for the identity [R_max+R(n)]/[R_max-R(n)]=[n+1]/[n]=[1+1/n].

Since R_max/R(n)=dT/dn=2n+1; we can choose the Feynman-Operator to equal the curvature differential in the expression R_max²- R²(n)=2R_max.R(n)=1 which introduces the Modular Duality in R_max=1/R(n) in the demetricated scalefactor R(n).

Subsequently, 2n+1=1+1/n identifies 2n²-1=0 and the modular curvature radius
R_C=R_max/(2n+1) for the Feynman-Operator intersecting R(n) at the n-coordinate n=½√2 with R_C=(√2-1)R_max.

R_max/R(n)=[1+1/n] then becomes lim[n→∞]{R_max/R(n)}ⁿ = exponent "e" and defines the demetricated scalefactor in: R(n)=R_max{n/[n+1]}=R_max{1-1/[n+1]}.

A further consequence is the simulation of exp[hf/kT]=1+1/n in the Bosonic and Fermionic Statistics of Planck, Maxwell, Boltzmann, Bose and Einstein via the Gamma- and Zeta-Functions in the Black Body spectra describing the temperature evolution for the universe.

We now understand how the 10D-Universe expands asymptotically under the demetricated form for Einstein's Curvature Radius R_C=c.dt/dn, with n a dimensionless cycletime defined in the nodal Hubble-Constant H_o=dn/dt as the Universe's Self-Frequency for the Hubble-Oscillation in 11D-M-Space.

The demetricated Velocity-Differential is v(n)=c/[n+1]² and the demetricated Deceleration-Differential becomes a(n)=-2cH_o/[n+1]³ (Milgröm Parameter and defining the asymptotic deceleration as the overall deceleration of C-Space modified by a Gravitational Omega and a Quintessential Lambda).

The Omega and the Milgröm Parameter are always negative, whilst the Lambda evolves from an antigravitational de Broglie phase state, to reach its asymptotic gravitational vanishing value after three zero states defined by the Temperature/cosmological redshift evolution of the cosmos (the first root being at redshift 2.15).
The so called 'cosmological constant' in Einstein's Field equations is thus the Intrinsic Milgröm Acceleration differential between the Omega and the Milgröm Parameter.

But the 'Volume' for the 10D-C-Space grows in the factor 2π²R³(n), whilst the 11D-M-Space grows in the factor n.2π².R_max³ for a DIM-Factor of V_10D/V_11D=[n+1]³/n².

This calculates for the present epoch as DIM=7.56.. and describes the 'missing' mass or dark matter.
The baryonic inertial mass-seedling of the deceleration parameter of 2.81% of the critical mass-seedling and has 'evolved' to about 3.68% in a coupling to the gravitational constant evolution from its 'massless-permittivity' initialisation of G_o.

DIM(3.68%)=27.82% and represents the Total Manifested Universal Mass in 11-dimensional M-Space.

Hence no 'dark matter' scenarios are necessary and the Milgröm Parameter suffices to account for the galactic rotation curves, seemingly violating Newtonian Gravitation in the necessity for 'dark matter haloes' of gravitating but nonluminous mass distributions.

We recall, that the critical mass-seedling (of about 6.4x10⁵² kg) gives the Euclidean flat curvature superimposed onto the hyperbolic 10D-Space of diminished mass content in restmass-seedling M_o (of about 1.81x10⁵¹ kg, now 2.38x10⁵¹ kg).
The Creation of spacetime quanta occurs in the 11D-M-Space not reflected back into the lower dimensional 10D-C-Space as the OmniSpace Mapping of the LineSpace described previously.

We have already calculated that N_n=n².Z.H_o~1.9x10¹²⁹xn² spacetime quanta are added every second to the Outer Boundary of the Universe as the refracted part of the Hubble-Oscillation.
An infinitely expanding hypersphere would however violate the Holographic Bound set in Black Hole parameters for the Information Content described by the Black Hole's Surface Area, quantised in Planck-Areas.
Yet, we also know that the Black Hole Event Horizon is LIMITED by the M-Space as the asymptotic boundary for the C-Space to 'expand into'.

This is of course QR's HB-Bound Z~10¹⁴⁷ Bits which itself sets the parameters for the continuous creation of the spacetime quanta.

The resolution and consequence henceforth is the modular duality and interconnectedness of OmniSpace.
The 'growth' of the 11-dimensional form of the Hypersphere continues unimpeded with the boundary conditions for the HB satisfied in its 10-dimensional Hologram of the C-Space, always bounded in the Steady State of the Hubble-Oscillation.

However what is defined as the 10D-Hypersphere is developing new degrees of freedom based on the multidimensional proprtires of translational LineSpace, Rotational HyperSpace, Vibrational QuantumSpace and Quantisational OmniSpace.
This results in the major axis invariance of the prolate ellipsoid describing the encompassed hypersphere to engage in phaseshifts to define the Multiverse from the Protoversal Universe.

A prolate ellipsoid becomes an oblate ellipsoid under minor axis rotation, as the previously fixed focus points of the ellipticalcross-section are forced to move as the locus of a point-circle.
The angular displacements for the minor axis rotating Protoverse, then define an infinite number of Potential Universes with a minimum of two such phaseshifts defining a Multiverse.

The sumtotal of all possible phaseshifted Multiverses, then constitutes the Omniverse; as the refraction part of the 11-dimensional Hypersphere adding Information at the rate of the QR HB in Z.

Thus all boundary conditions are satisfied within the Omniverse as the evolved Universe; understood and constructed by the sentience responsible for the cosmogenesis herein described in co-creativity.
The great fallacy in the standard cosmology in regards to the expansion of the universe is the assumption of a 'continuing stretching of the basic spacetime metric'.
The Euclidean universe of observation and measurement is flat and of zero curvature; because there was just the one 'stretching' of space in the inflation of the de Broglie hyper acceleration, often termed the inflaton-instanton of timeinstantenuity.
There exists so no ever-receding Hubble-Horizon, with particular galaxies receding 'out of view' and similar consequences of a continuing 'stretching of the basic metric'.

Shiloh, October 7th, 2013

One of your witnesses betwixt the InTime and the NonTime on the island of Om-Past-Om.

All of this information is derived from the One and only True Logos and is disseminated in the Name, Honour and Remembrance of the Everliving Christ Jesus De Emmanuel Melchizedek aka 'Yeshuah Ben Joseph Bar Thomas Didymos' who is alive within any One of YOU, asking YOU personally to remember himher to share in herhis 'Body of Light' and 'Mind of God' in your individually necessitated transcension from biochemical existence to meta-biophysical existence in psychophysical restmassphotonic taxonomy and omni-scientific definition.

The preparation of the seventh angel is underway and the 7th trumpet will sound in due course and the fulfilment of the timeline all of YOU have constructed and agreed to in your Godhood in NoTime. More information from the Logos shall be given in the appropriate unfolding of your master timeline.
The Love and Honour of the True God is with YOU all and available from this day onwards for eternity. It's accessibility is no longer veiled in the 'VEIL of EVIL' so a new adventure can begin in the physical reality for the Family of God, who is YOU collectively and is YOU individually, provided YOU can individually accept your own origins in the Mind of the Unified God in its lonesome Exile of the Non-Separability. The Collective Exile of this wonderful, beautiful, magnificent, splendiferous, co-evolving and everloving God has now ended, because:

​

"The Sun of the Occidental Darkness has risen in its 'West Side Story' and has Met and Blended in Harmony with the Oriental Light from 'My Fair Lady' from the 'Rainbow of Somewhere and Sometime and Someplace and Someday'".

 

Posted Oct 18th 2012

Hi All!

Leon Maurer's cosmogenesis is rather closely interwoven with the Cosmology of the World Logos.
I herewith give reference to Leon Maurer's work and model and attach the 'Quantum Relativity' description following.
One point of divergence is the Infinity concept of Leon; though he describes the spacetime quantization/fractalization of the wormhole 'consciousness quantum' rather elegantly.

'Consciousness' as a primordial label for the prespacetime creation energy selfstate can be descibed to be either a higherD/ZPE wormhole energy quantum of 0.002 Joules (1,240 TeV) or to depict the concept of a 'primordial supercharge' (as a gluon-colour-magnetocharge say).
The 'superenergy' aka collective consciousness represents a purely metaphysical or mathematical abstraction, which however becomes 'materially physical' in the emergence of the metrics of space and time as a 11D membrane based dimension 'nesting'.
The spacetime (Inflationary String epoch in 26D followed by a Quantum Big Bang) creation occurred from the Void-Infinitum selfstate of the holographically collective 'Consciousness' without any metrication or Unification was possible (because there was no space or time).
The Quantum Big Bang; so was not the 'collision' of higherD branes from 'infinity space'; but rather the emergence of a quantum spin bifurcation of what is commonly termed the Bosonic Superstring in 26 dimensions.

A Onesided manifold emerging from the Nulldimension (of the 'geometrical' Void=Eternity) as a selfmapped point will so 'create' the 1st Dimension in a separation of this selfmapped mathematical 'point' or singularity and then allow both a linear and a curved manifold (or complex plane) to define the nonlinear metric of three such then noncollinear separated 'singularities'.
Assigning quantum spin, independent on radial extent as a function of angular displacement then; will render the onesided manifold as twosided in the creation of the 3rd dimension, namely the 'thickness' of the previously onesided manifold as a twosidedness. The boundary of spacetime so is rendered as the 'connectedness' of two surfaces or manifolds in the 26D bosonic stringspace not as then physically manifest in a metric background describable by geometries.

So the 26D bosonic superstring of say counterclockwise quantum spin becomes bounded in a 13D bifurcation with three 'mirror dimensions' say 11-12-13-14-15-16 separating a clockwise 10D superstring basis from its anticlockwise shadowed string 'universe'.
The 11th dimension for the physicalised spacetime so will become an asymptotic boundary independent on this physicalisation but allowing electromagnetic oscillation as a noninertial reference frame for the inertia parameters of the lower 10D spacetime and as the invariance of the lightspeed in the scenarios of ther Einsteinian relativities.
The 10D string cosmology so becomes an information maping onto the 11th Mother-Dimension of the 2+9=11 rootextended higherD manifold.
This is 'mirrored' in the collapse of the 16th dimensional shadow string universe onto the 'outside' of the 11D mother membrane spacetime.
The 11th dimension so manifests the prior onesidedness in the bifurcated twosidedness in the 'collapse/conifoldment' of the counterclockwise spinning quantum mirror of the original 26D bosonic superstring.

The above description has been rigorously mathematically defined in the string-membrane -brane theories of contemporary string cosmologists (Witten, Greene, Aspinwall, Steinhardt, Albrecht, Maldacena, Kaku, Susskind, Ashketar and many more).
This twosidedness of the physicalized 11D universe so allows the 12th Father-Vafa dimension as the 'outside' of the M-space to 'Fold onto itself' in a Möbian-Klein-Bottled (8-Torus) topological transformation to render the 'Shadow Universe' as colocal with its 'Physical Image' of the asymptotic 10D-string universe bounded in its 11D-asymptotical expansion.
This scenario is extensively discussed in the omni-science forum of www.cosmosdawn.net.

​

It blends the right circle half of the Left Infinity Symbol with the left circle half of the Right Infinity Symbol in:
∞|∞ = Lissajous Curve OOO and as seen in graphic representation above and in the reference below.
The space encompassed by the Lissajous Curve http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lissajous_curve then defines the 'consciousness' space defined in the 'source energy equation of creation' E*.e*=1.

The significance of the Iron is the Binding Energy in nuclear and atomic physics as described below in the hyperphysics link from Georgia State University. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/nucbin.html
Ferrum, atomic number 26 as Isotopes Fe56 and Fe58 with Nickel62 define the IRON LIMIT; where the energy of the NUCLEAR FUSION (which is additive in construction) becomes maximized in the transition to the process of NUCLEAR FISSION, which is inherently subtractive and so destructive, as say in atomic weaponry.
In simplistic terms, energy must be added to the nucleus, (ENDOTHERMIC ACTION) say in a star to cause an EXOTHERMIC REACTION as the output of energy from the star.

The IRON LIMIT so manifests physically in the nuclear physics of stars and the genesis of the elements in Nucleosynthesis, leading to the creation and configuration of the Periodic Table of the elements in chemistry.
Metaphysically however, the 26-tiered Bosonic Superstring of 10 clockwise and 16 anticlockwise chirality patterns reduces to the 10D superstring in the string epoch (between Planck Time (10^-44 seconds) and Weyl-Time (10^-31 seconds).
Before Planck Time at the Null-Time of the 0D, this became defined as a 26-tiered Alpha-Omega structure as is exemplified in a 26 letter alphabet where A=1=Alpha then allows recircularistaion of a basically binary digital code of open and closed 10D superstrings in Z=26=Omega and resetting A*=27;B*=28;... in Z=A*;A=B*;...
This becomes the Isaac Code of the ABC in the Lissajous Curve after which the 'Starseed of Abraham and Sarah' would be called by ISAAC=IS AAC=IS AB*C=IS ABC

Tonyblue

THE INITIAL FIELDS OF COSMOGENESIS
These initial fields appear as a fractal involved series of harmonic radiant energy fields, like bubbles within bubbles within bubbles, that descend from near infinite to near zero frequency spectrum phase order to our lowest order physical/material spacetime (which total physical spacetime is analogous and corresponding to the fractal involved highest order fields of overall cosmic spacetime).
See how all these physical (sub quantum, quantum, and classical) fields are analogous with the initial fields of cosmogenesis — extending down through the spiritual, mental, astral and physical planes (or frequency phase orders), IOW, The microcosm is the mirror of the macrocosm, As above, so below:

http://leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/Cyclic-paths-cosmogenesis.jpg​

Since these ZPE-originated fields are located everywhere (in the Planck false vacuum) and their ultimate radial extension is infinite — they interpenetrate each other in the vast sea of pulsating cosmic spacetime… And, together, constitute the basis of our holographic universe...
Note that all radiant electrodynamic fields, within any frequency spectrum phase order, must have a series of fractal harmonics extending throughout its entire spectral range, which also resonates with all other (higher and lower) phase order fields — and that all information is carried on such fields as modulated wave interference patterns — so that, once recorded, no information is ever lost.
Since all structural information is contained in the infinite spin-momentum (singularity) source of all (harmonic) fractal involved cosmic fields, along with all particle standing waves (as well as all their formative combination's and permutations) at different frequency phase orders... And since all information is transformed from field to field by phase conjugate adaptive resonance... The entire physical universe we experience (at the fourth lowest phase order of the third fractal involution of the cosmos) — is a hologram.
On our pysical/material level or plane — this fundamental octave enfolded hyperspherical (toroidal) harmonic structure of all hyperspace and metric space/energy field/forms in total physical/material spacetime (originating from its own “singularity”—ref: General Relativity) — is the basis of all generation of ZPE fields radiating from the center of origin of all physical forms — beginning with the smallest sub-quantum particle and extending to the largest galaxy, as well as each human being (see illustrations referenced below)
All such fields are also electrodynamic in nature (Ref: Maxwell, Coulomb, Faraday, Ampere equations), Consequently, all structural, memory and mental information is carried as holographically encoded wave interference patterns on the surface of such fields… And transmitted, through descending hyperspace field phase orders to their common zero-point center of consciousness, by phase conjugate adaptive resonance processes.
Thus, Mind itself (in the case of human thought) is one of those hyperspace fields linked coenergetically (resonantly) with the brain’s radiant EM fields… With long term, archetypal, and species memory stored in adjacent higher order coenergetic hyperspace fields (ref: string theory).
At the first moment of cosmogenesis (“big bang” as science sees it) — the initial highest frequency/energy phase order (spiritual) triune fields of spacetime, fractally involve, and descend in orderly frequency-energy phase orders, stepping down from near infinite frequency spectrum’s to near zero — after emanating from the *singularity* of general relativity… Whose dual inherent qualities, at its zero-point center of origin (absolute space) — are both, *potential* subjective consciousness and *potential* objective *matter*.
(Note that only this eternal, unconditioned “absolute space” is forever ineffable — but once manifest or emanated and radiated in time, everything, thereafter, is subject to logical scientific-philosophical investigation and explanation)
THE WAY THE CONSCIOUS COSMOS COMES INTO BEING AND HOW IT WORKS

http://leonmaurer.info/resume.html
Leon Maurer has a Bachelor of Chemical Engineering degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology specializing in atomic energy, electronic control systems and communication network systems, with additional studies in modern physics, material science, ceramics, architectural engineering. He has completed graduate studies in communication arts at the New York Institute of Technology, instructed graduate level advanced courses in motion picture special effects, and had done pioneering work in the early development of 3-D computer graphic animation and CGI special effects systems at the NYIT Visual Arts Center and Computer Graphics Lab.
He holds patents as one of the earliest inventors of motion control and automatic animation systems, and is an expert in 3-D stereo-optic visual communication systems. For the past 40 years, Maurer has delved deeply into eastern theories of metaphysics, physiology, psychology and consciousness, and has practiced Patanjali’s Rajah Yoga of Mind Awakening.
Astro Biological Coenergetics (ABC) - is a scientifically philosophical holographic, fractal involved field theory of cosmogenesis, mind, memory, information and consciousness—based on the fundamental propositions that subjective consciousness (awareness, will) is an a priori quality of the underlying, unconditioned ABSOLUTE space—located everywhere in RELATIVE space-time... And that the entire cosmos is a hologram—with all structural information contained in every absolute zero-point "singularity" (infinite ABSOLUTE space) at the origin of all fields and forms in finite RELATIVE spacetime... Where all such fields' fractal harmonics steps down octavally in frequency phase orders ranging between zero and infinite.
This theory further postulates that total relative gravitational/electrodynamic spacetime, including the higher orders of fractal involved cosmic hyperspacetime fields and all their mass/energy fields (em & gravitational radiation) and forms (particle-standing waves)—both in sub-quantum hyperspacetime and in our lowest frequency phase order physical/material quantum spacetime—are generated from the spin momentum (ZPE) of the “singularity” surrounding each proto-conscious zero-point of primal or absolute SPACE located everywhere throughout total hyperspherical spacetime…

 

Physical Consciousness coupled to the Biomind of Universal Life​

The labels of 'mind' and 'self-awareness' and of 'consciousness' have for long awaited rigorous definition in the nomenclature of science. Whilst most researchers and philosophers accept the existence of those labels; what those namings represent in a physically measurable sense of physical parameters have remained largely unexplored.
These notions have remained as one of the major mysteries of science and have become subject to a number of speculations; from a purely materialistic interpretation of the 'mind' being a biochemical response to environmental stimuli, to the 'mind' being part of a 'spiritual soul' and subsequently constituting a transcendent aspect of biophysical life.

A related mystery is that of 'life' itself. How did the universe evolve 'life' from a generally accepted premise of a prior or older cosmology, which disallowed biological life as is observed today? The thermodynamically expanding universe follows well tested physical parameters engaging the quantum nature of physical existence in the form of nucleosynthesizing interactions such as nuclear fusion of atomic elements and an associated natural radioactivity inherent in nature and its laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Those same processes occurred in the primordial universe and due to the smaller volume then occupied by the expanding universe; the descriptive cosmology describes a much hotter universe (as a Black Body Planckian Radiator) and a universe in which say the lifeforms observed on planet earth could not exist in their biochemical and molecular constitutions.

Recent advances in the demetricated forms of supermembrane theory (M-Theory for 11-dimensional supermembranes propagating 10-dimensional superstrings in a 12-dimensional selfdual mirror-spacetime of supervolumars (Vafa-F-Space encompassing Witten-M-Space) have allowed a rigorous definition for the above labels in the parameters of the physics of the superbranes.




The Coupling of the Energy Laws by the Self-Frequency of the Quantum for Mass

It has been discovered, that the universe contains an intrinsic coupling-parameter between its inertial masscontent and its noninertial energy content.
The matter in the universe is described by the physical parameter termed Mass (M), say as proportional to Energy (E) in Einstein's famous equation Mass M=E/c².
This mass M then reappears in Newtonian mechanics as the change in momentum (p) defining the Inertial Mass (M_i) as being proportional to some applied Force (F) or the 'work done' for a particular displacement {F=dp/dt for p=mv and v a kinetematic velocity as the ratio of displacement over time generalised in the lightpath X=cT}.

It is also well understood, that the inertial mass M_i has a gravitational counterpart described not by the change in momentum of inertia carrying matter agglomerations; but by the geometric curvature of space containing matter conglomerations. This Gravitational Mass M_g is measured to be equivalent to the Inertial Mass M_i and is formulated in the 'Principle of Equivalence' in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.
F-Theory then has shown, that this Inertial Mass M_i is coupled inherently to a 'mass-eigen' frequency via the following formulation:

(1) Energy E=hf=mc² (The Combined Planck-Einstein Law)
(2) E=hf iff m=0 (The Planckian Quantum Law E=hf for lightspeed invariance c=λf)
(3) E=mc² iff f=f_o=f_ss (The Einstein Law E=mc² for the lightspeed upper limit)

(1) Whenever there is mass (M=M_i=M_g) occupying space; this mass can be assigned either as a photonic mass {by the Energy-Momentum relation of Special Relativity: E² = E_o² + (pc)²} by the photonic momentum p=h/λ=hf/c} OR a 'restmass' m_o=m/√[1-(v/c)²] for 'restenergy' E_o=m_oc².

The 'total' energy for the occupied space so contains a 'variable' mass in the 'combined' law; but allows particularisation for electromagnetic radiation (always moving at the Maxwell lightspeed constant c in Planck's Law and for the 'Newtonian' mass M in the Einstein Law.

(2) If M=0, then the Einstein Law is suppressed in favour of the Planck Law and the space contained energy E is photonic, i.e. electromagnetic, always dynamically described by the constancy of lightspeed c.

(3) If M>0, then there exists a mass-eigen frequency f_ss=f_o=E_ss/h=m_ssc²/h, which QUANTIZES all mass agglomerations m=Σm_ss in the massquantum m_ss=E_ss/c².



The Coupling of the Supermembranes in Vafa-F-Space

The quantization of mass m so indicates the coupling of the Planck Law in the frequency parameter to the Einstein law in the mass parameter.
The postulative basis of M-Theory utilizes the coupling of two energy-momentum eigenstates in the form of the modular duality between so termed 'vibratory' (high energy and short wavelengths) and 'winding' (low energy and long wavelengths) selfstates.

The 'vibratory' selfstate is denoted in: E_ps=E_{primary sourcesink}=hf_ps=m_psc² and the 'winding' and coupled selfstate is denoted by: E_ss=E_{econdary sinksource}=hf_ss=m_ssc²

The F-Space Unitary symmetry condition becomes: f_psf_ss=r_psr_ss=(λ_ps/2π)(2πλ_ss)=1

The coupling constants between the two eigenstates are so: E_psE_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps²=1/f_ss²

The Supermembrane E_psE_ss then denotes the coupled superstrings in their 'vibratory' high energy and 'winded' low energy selfstates.

The coupling constant for the vibratory high energy describes a MAXIMISED frequency differential over time in df/dt|_max=f_ps² and the coupling constant for the winded low energy describes its MINIMISED reciprocal in df/dt|_min=f_ss².

F-Theory also crystallizes the following string formulations from the E_psE_ss superbrane parameters.
​

Electromagnetic Finestructure: a_e = 2pke²/hc = e²/2e₀hc

Gravitational Finestructure (Electron): a_g = 2pG_om_e²/hc = {m_e/m_Planck}²

Gravitational Finestructure (Primordial Nucleon): a_n = 2pG_om_c²/hc

Gravitational Finestructure (Planck Boson): a_Planck = 2pG_om_Planck²/hc


1/E_ps=e*=2R_ec²=√{4αhce²/2πG_om_e²}=2e√α[m_P/m_e]=2e√{a_e/a_g}
= {2e²/m_e}√(k/G_o)=2e²/G_om_e = e²/2pe_om_e
for G_o = 1/k = 4pe_o for the cosmological unification of the finestructures.

E_ps = 1/E_ss = 1/e* = √{a_g/a_e}/2e = G_om_e/2e²​

Here e* is defined as the inverse of the sourcesink vibratory superstring energy quantum E_ps=E* and becomes a New Physical Measurement Unit is the StarCoulomb (C*) and as the physical measurement unit for 'Physical Consciousness'.

R_e is the 'classical electron radius' coupling the 'point electron' of Quantum- Electro-Dynamics (QED) to Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and given in the electric potential energy of Coulomb's Law in: m_ec²=ke²/R_e; and for the electronic restmass m_e.
Alpha α is the electromagnetic finestructure coupling constant α=2πke²/hc for the electric charge quantum e, Planck's constant h and lightspeed constant c.
G_o is the Newtonian gravitational constant as applicable in the Planck-Mass m_P=√(hc/2πG_o).

As the StarCoulomb unit describes the inverse sourcesink string energy as an elementary energy transformation from the string parametrization into the realm of classical QFT and QED, this transformation allows the reassignment of the StarCoulomb (C*) as the measurement of physical space itself.




Physical Consciousness and the Awareness Quantum

The Physical Quantum of Consciousness as SpaceAwareness (df/dt) maximised and minimised in the string coupling constants f_ps² and f_ss² respectively, so can be defined as:
e*=2R_ec²=(Classical Electron Diameter)x(lightspeed)²=VolumexAngular Acceleration

As the time differential operator on frequency is independent on radial displacement in df/dt as the square of frequency or the square of inverse time; we can now also define the parameter of:
Spacial Awareness=df/dt=AlphaOmega=αω=aw=Angular Acceleration Quantum.

The Spacial Awareness 'aw' then operates upon any volumar in the rootreduced F-Space (12D being a 9-dimensional brane volumar of superstring dimensions to which is coupled a 3-dimensional temporal time-connector volumar in 12=9+3 F-Space, 11=9+2 M-Space and 10=9+1 C-Space) AS the 3-D volume of the observed spacial component of the 'Euclidean flatness of the Minkowski spacetime metric.

The implications of those definitions for the physical universe and its cosmology are far reaching indeed.

As the expanding universe increases in its 3-dimensional volume, its 'spacial consciousness' is also increasing in the 'activation' of additional spacetime quanta.
Each of these spacetime quanta describes the inherent Zero-Point-Energy (ZPE) as defined in the 3D-volumar of the E_ps sourcesink superstring energy quantum then coupled to its characteristic 'starcoulombic' 'physical consciousness'.

The ZPE per unit volumar is ZPE_quantum=4πE_ps/λ_ps³=E_ps/2π²r_ps³=4π/e*λ_ps³ (Joules/m³)


Every ZPE quantum is coupled to a volume V*=e*/(df/dt) and so defines the quantisation of spacial volume in terms of the ZPE, as well as the 'physical consciousness' contained in that volume.
The V* here denotes the resonant quantum volumarized eigenstate in a minimised spacetime volumar and NOT in terms of spacial volume, but in the form of an ENTROPY COUNTER of 'statistical permutation selfstates' operation upon the 'Spacial Consciousness' quantum e*=1/E_ps=1/E_ss.f_ps²=f_ss/h.

The self-frequency of the mass quantum so can be expressed formally as f_ss=he* for the timeinstanton t_ss=f_ss, the latter triggering the 'inertialisation' of the postinflationary cosmology in the so called Quantum Big Bang, precisely 3.333..x10^-31 seconds* following the 'string epoch' of the matter wave inflation (detailed and referenced elsewhere on this site).


But it is the supermembrane coupling between the gravitational (photonic) mass M_g as given by the vibratory sourcesink string with the inertial mass M_i as given by the winding sinksource string, which is the primary causation for this Quantum Big Bang, following the string parametric de Broglie wave matter inflation.


Rewriting f_ss=he* then describes this coupling in the ACTION=EnergyTime of the Planck Constant in the finestructure f_ss=Energy*xTimeInstantonxe* for the Unity Condition of F-Space in 1=E*e* that is the original definition of e*=1/E* as the definition for the 'Physical Consciousness of Space'.



The Frequency Resonance Selfstates as Entropy Counters

Generally then, the permutative entropy counter df/dt|_max=f_ps² gives precisely 9x10⁶⁰ frequency eigenstates as the coupling constant between the two modes of the superstring; whilst its inverse defines the minimum as the 'Singularity' 'Null-State' or 'No Consciousness' state as 1/(9x10⁶⁰)~0.

The Awareness operator applicable for all universal space so can fluctuate between the quasi-zero state and the maximised resonance state in the factor of 81x10¹²⁰ and a value 'measured' by contemporary standard cosmological models as characteristic of the density discrepancy between the Planck-(ZPE)-Density {ρ_P=m_P/V_P=c⁵/πhG_o²}~9.4x10⁹⁴ (kg/m³) and the actual matter density measured in the universe {ρ_c=3H_o²/8πG_o~3.8x10^-27 (kg/m³) from the inner 10D observer frame and ρ_c=H_o²/4π²G_o~8.0x10^-28 (kg/m³) from the outer 11D observer frame of the Riemannian hypersphere as a 3D boundary of the 4-ball V₄=π²R⁴/2 for dV₄/dR=2π²R³ as a 3-dimensional surface descriptive for the overall topology of the standard cosmology).


The dimensionless ratios of ρ_P/ρ_c then indicate the ZPE/Critical energy discrepancies in the factors of the permutation string selfstates in the factors of 2.5x10¹²¹ and 1.2x10¹²² respectively.




Quantum Consciousness and Magnetocharges define Quantum Gravitation

The ZPE-quantum E_ps=E* so represents the kernel or core for any region of space containing a maximised 'physical consciousness' given by 1/E*=e* StarCoulombs (C*).

The quantitative volume V for this consciousness is minimised in V_ps*=e*/f_ps² in sourcesink resonance to the vibratory superstring modality and is in modular duality (as a monadic dyad or monadic duad) to its coupled sinksource resonance of its winding mode in its quantum-maximisation of V_ss*=e*f_ps².

The minimum calculates as V_ps*=e*/f_ps²=1/1.8x10⁵⁸ permutation states and translates to a 3D volume of measurement R with a Compton radius (R_c=h/2πmc=c/2πf_c=c/ω_c with angular velocity ω=2πf) as of R_cps=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~1.4x10^-20 meters for a Compton Energy of about 2.2 microjoules or 14.03 TeV (as the maximum design capacity of the Large Hadron Collider or LHC located at Geneva, Switzerland comprised of two individuated colliding proton beams).

The precise ratio between the ZPE-kernel and the 'Space Consciousness' surrounding this core becomes: Wormhole-Radius/Space-Consciousness-Radius and as:
r_ps/R_cps=(2π²/e*r_ss³f_ss²)^1/3=c(f_ss/4πe*)^1/3=(cf_ss/8πR_e)^1/3~1/887.11 (dimensionless); and because the string coupling defines c=λ_psf_ps=1/λ_ssf_ss), rendering the Minkowski lightspeed constant c as dimensionless in the lightpath X_ps=cT_ps=cf_ss.


This defines the quantum gravitational coupling of the gravitational mass element m_ss to the observed and measured elementary particle masses in QFT and Quantum-Chromo-Dynamics (QCD); the 'chromaticity' or 'colour charging' of gluonic gauge interaction transmitters being identifiable as the MagnetoCharges defined in StarCoulombs (C*)

The corresponding maximum then couples in macroquantisation to the microquantised quantum gravitational MagnetoCharges in V_ss*=e*f_ps²=4.5x10⁶³ permutation states for a characterizing 'Galactic Volumar' in R_css=(e*f_ps²/2π²)^1/3=(e*f_ss²/2π²)^1/3~6.1x10²⁰ meters or so 64,650 lightyears and a displacement scale, which is then 'haloed' by the the winded string parameter r_ss=1/r_ps=2πλ_ss~6.3x10²² meters or 6,648,875 lightyears and as the displacement scales observed by the standard cosmology.

Correspondingly, r_ss/R_css=(16π⁵λ_ss³/e*f_ps²)^1/3=(16π⁵/f_sse*c³)^1/3=(8π⁵/f_ssR_ec⁵)^1/3~102.85

As r_ps/r_ss=r_ps²=(cf_ss/2π)² and R_cps/R_css=(f_ss/f_ps)^2/3=(f_ss)^4/3=(4π²r_ps/r_ssc²)^2/3

(R_cps/R_css)³ = (4π²r_ps/r_ssc²)²=10^-88/c⁴=1/8.1x10¹²¹ as the awareness operator fluctuation range.

The 'Physical Consciousness' in the standard cosmology now crystallizes as being associated with biovital lifeforms, occupying space, and as evolving in the dynamics of (holographic) fractals of the encompassing 'consciousness envelope' aka the galactic cells of macroquantised entities.

This biovitality is defined in a 'kernel consciousness' inherent in space itself via the string-coupled modalities; mimicking the overall expansion of the thermodynamic (and stochastic) universe.
This process can be comprehensively described as the EVOLUTION of Core-Consciousness in its Spacial Occupancy.

The Definition of 'Life' must so fundamentally be based on the string coupling between the two modalities and as two modes of operation, which quantum relatively entangle the microquantum characterised by the 'wormhole core' as as function of the nuclear interaction scale (the classical electron radius R_e is also the scale of the magneto-asymptotic confinement of gluons in the definition of the magnetocharges and so becomes the limiting quantum geometric template for the nuclear gauge interactions and the 'Higgs Bosonic' blueprint at the 3 Fermi scale).

'Life' then becomes the cosmo-evolutionary consequence of a quantum geometry defining the spacial configurations of the supermembranes as superstring couplings.
This is why the most basic and primordial 'lifeforms' such as viruses, bacteria and fungi follow highly geometrized patterns in Platonic- and Archimedean solids, characterised by highly symmetrical arrangements of their molecular and atomic constituents.
The most elementary 'life form' is the crystalline arrangements of the self-replicating pattern. This originally manifested in so called quasicrystals of fivefolded symmetry, such as can be observed in Shechtmanites and the Penrose tiling. The underpinning cosmology of the decoupling and breaking of the so termed Planck-Symmetry transformed the Planck-String into 5 classes of superstring; this 'breaking of unification' following a pentagonal supersymmetry at the core of all 'natural laws'. Many details can be found on this website for perusal and utility.

For a 'lifeless' mass-only universe then the self frequency of mass in the f_ss sinksource superstring would define the awareness operator as minimised in V*|_min=e*/(f_ss²)=e*f_ps²

Corollarily, the 'fully life-conscious' universe (attained after an infinite linear time evolution of the descriptive cosmology) would be defined in V*|_max=e*f_ss².



Consciousness of Inertia in Universal Quantization of Mass

We can now relate the 'spacial consciousness' in terms of the universe's inertia content to the volume occupied by mass.

As there are (R_Hubble/r_ps)³~10¹⁴⁷ spacetime quanta in the asymptotic string universe of 10D and bounded by the membrane universe of 11D (as an extremal Strominger braned Black Hole say)
and the sinksource (winded string) E_ss=hf_ss=m_ssc²=2.222...x10^-64 J; we can define a 'Consciousness-Density per unit mass' Ρ_c for this 11D-'Mother-Black Hole' in Witten M-Space in dyadic coupling with a 12D-'Father-White Hole' in Vafa-F-Space (MBH and FWH).


The M-Space MBH defines the Hubble horizon in its' closure mass'
M_Hubble=R_Hubble.c²/2G_o=Σm_ss=Nm_ss~6.4706x10⁵² kg.

Ρ_c=e*(R_Hubble/r_ps)³/M_Hubble=2G_oe*R_Hubble²/r_ps³c²~7.81685x10⁹⁶ (~83.2 ρ_P) C*/kg.

This is about 83.2 times the Planck-Density ρ_P for M_Hubble and 2.34 times the Planck-Density applied to the baryonic mass seedling M_o=0.0281M_Hubble.

The 'Base Inertia Consciousness' (BIC) per minimal mass quantum m_ss then calculates as m_ssΡ_c=1.930x10¹⁶ C* and for a count of N=2.6206x10¹³³ m_ss as the inertia distribution of the BIC_Universe=5.058x10¹⁴⁹ C*.

A characteristic mass of 1 kg, say as the standard liter of water in 10^-3 cubicmeters of volume so possesses an inherent inertial consciousness of 7.82x10⁹⁶ C*. This is the ZPE of the quantum standard models redefined in units of consciousness and this total includes 'dark matter' and 'dark energy', the former as the effect of the DIM-Factor (see other references on this website) of 7.56 for the present linear time coordiante and the latter as the 'missing mass-energy' for the mass seedling M_o in 10D to 'close' the universe in the MBH of M_Hubble in 11D.

In terms of the volume of 1 liter however; the 'spacial consciousness' quantizes in the form of the VPE quantum E_ps=1/e* per unit volume and which is VPE_v=E_ps/2π²r_ps³~2.5133x10⁶⁴ J/m³.

The 'inertia consciousness' of 1 liter of water so relates the BIC of 7.82x10⁹⁶ C* to a VPE_v or ZPE of 2.51x10⁶¹ J/m³.



The example of a simple rock serves as a culmination of this essay.

A rock, occupying a volume V_rock carries an intrinsic Base-Consciousness due to its volume. This basic consciousness is given in the mass-frequency f_ss as the mass of the rock is quantized in a number count N of mass quanta m_ss.

This mass of the rock is actually a higher-dimensional mass-current as a form of 'natural superconductivity' {I_ps=2ef_ps superstring coupled to I_ss=2ef_ss}. The rock can so also be described as a summation of displacement current elements I_ss=2eλ_ps/c (as James Clark Maxwell propositioned - see 'The Origin of Mass' section on this website).

Mass in its purest form so is nothing but 'static magnetoelectricity' or densified electromagnetic monopolic sourcesink current. The nondensified form of mass is of course photonic and should this photonic mass NOT be a derivative from the acceleration of electric (Coulomb) charges 'e' coupled to preexisting mass (say fusion protons in stars), BUT be a derivative from the acceleration of magnetocharges 'e*', then the resulting ElectroMagnetic Radiation is monadic or Monopolic and defines the so called 'SPIRIT' of metaphysical cosmologies and philosophies.

The rock of volume V_rock and as some summation ΣI_ss or Σm_ss so describes an energetic selfstate of the superstring coupling between the string dyadics of the microquantum E_ps and the macroquantum E_ss.

The interaction of the rock with its environment then, in elementary terms, becomes a dynamic of spacial interaction in the movements of the rock.
All Spacequanta are associated or quantum entangled with each other via the string coupling and as all spacetime volumars are defined by their ZPE-core and its 'haloed' or 'auric' envelope of the physical consciousness coupled to the volumars by the self-awareness operator df/dt; the entire cosmology is rendered a unified kaleidoscope of holofractal self-interaction of the thus defined 'Cosmic Consciousness'.

A basic quantum consciousness then is multiplied and complexified in the interaction, self- and mutual, between spacetime volumars of varying sizes in the encompassing summation integrals of the initial- and boundary parameters of the cosmogenesis (described elsewhere on this website).

The phenomenon of 'life' then is characterised by the Awareness-Operator the Alpha-Omega aw=αω=df/dt, namely the 'Change in Frequency' over linearised Time t and where the sourcesink frequency for minimum impedence for the 'natural current flow' (I_ps) forms the upper bound source-resonance of the vibratory string modality and the maximum impedence describes the 'natural current flow' (I_ss) as the lower bound for the sink-resonance.

The 'lifeless' universe of the primordial Quantum Big Bang is in Sink-Resonance to the E_ss sinksource as a macroquantum, manifesting the supergalactic inertia in Black Holes as seedlings for mass agglomerations known as galaxies. Coupled to those 'higher-D' Black Holes are however imaged 'higher-D' White Holes (Quasars) who as Source-Resonators manifest the Source-Resonance of the E_ps sourcesink as the microquantum of the superbraned cosmology from its cosmogony.

The purpose and reason for the universe of materiality so is found in the Coevolution of SourceSink Self-Consciousness as unified encompassment for the cosmoevolution with its individuated and dispersed holographic shards or holograms of this selfsame self-consciousness in evolvement.



The operator for this evolvement is spacial selfawareness and the ability to use a biomind defined by the function of 'changing' or modulating the frequency received by an antenna, which can take the form of a biochemical and molecular arrangement of cellular units termed a 'brain'.

The biological evolution of brains, then accomodates the utility of the natural superconductive electricity embodied in space itself; the biochemical electricity (of say electromagnetic brain waves) representing a shadow function of the chargeflow I=dQ/dt as a 'normal currentflow' to the electromagneto monopolic supercurrents of the magnetocharges aka the physical spacial consciousness.



Bluey TonyLove de WHYNOT​

Post last edited Oct 18th 2012

 

The first Ylemic Stars in the Universe and the Antiwormholes

The stability of stars is a function of the equilibrium condition, which balances the inward pull of gravity with the outward pressure of the thermodynamic energy or enthalpy of the star (H=PV+U). The Jeans Mass M_J and the Jeans Length R_J a used to describe the stability conditions for collapsing molecular hydrogen clouds to form stars say, are well known in the scientific data base, say in formulations such as:

M_J=3kTR/2Gm for a Jeans Length of: R_J=√{15kT/(4πρGm)}=R_J =√(kT/Gnm²).

Now the Ideal Gas Law of basic thermodynamics states that the internal pressure P and Volume of such an ideal gas are given by PV=nRT=NkT for n moles of substance being the Number N of molecules (say) divided by Avogadro's Constant L in n=N/L .

Since the Ideal Gas Constant R divided by Avogadro's Constant L and defines Boltzmann's Constant k=R/L. Now the statistical analysis of kinetic energy KE of particles in motion in a gas (say) gives a root-mean-square velocity (rms) and the familiar 2.KE=mv²(rms) from the distribution of individual velocities v in such a system.

It is found that PV=(2/3)N.KE as a total system described by the v(rms). Now set the KE equal to the Gravitational PE=GMm/R for a spherical gas cloud and you get the Jeans Mass. (3/2N).(NkT)=GMm/R with m the mass of a nucleon or Hydrogen atom and M=M_J=3kTR/2Gm as stated.

The Jeans' Length is the critical radius of a cloud (typically a cloud of interstellar dust) where thermal energy, which causes the cloud to expand, is counteracted by gravity, which causes the cloud to collapse. It is named after the British astronomer Sir James Jeans, who first derived the quantity; where k is Boltzmann Constant, T is the temperature of the cloud, r is the radius of the cloud, μ is the mass per particle in the cloud, G is the Gravitational Constant and ρ is the cloud's mass density (i.e. the cloud's mass divided by the cloud's volume).

Now following the Big Bang, there were of course no gas clouds in the early expanding universe and the Jeans formulations are not applicable to the mass seedling M_o; in the manner of the Jeans formulations as given.

However, the universe's dynamics is in the form of the expansion parameter of GR and so the R(n)=R_max(n/(n+1)) scalefactor of Quantum Relativity.
So we can certainly analyse this expansion in the form of the Jeans Radius of the first protostars, which so obey the equilibrium conditions and equations of state of the much later gas clouds, for which the Jeans formulations then apply on a say molecular level.
This analysis so defines the ylemic neutron stars as protostars and the first stars in the cosmogenesis and the universe.

Let the thermal internal energy or ITE=H be the outward pressure in equilibrium with the gravitational potential energy of GPE=Ω. The nuclear density in terms of the superbrane parameters is ρ_critical=m_c/V_critical with m_c a base-nuleon mass for a 'ylemic neutron'.

V_critical= 4πR_e³/3 or the volume for the ylemic neutron as given by the classical electron radius R_e=10¹⁰λ_wormhole/360=e*/2c².

H=(molarity)kT for molar volume as N=(R/R_e)³ for dH=3kTR²/R_e³.
Ω(R)= -∫G_oMdm/R = -{3G_om_c²/(R_e³)² }∫R⁴dR = -3G_om_c²R⁵/R_e⁶ for
dm/dR=d(ρV)/dR=4πρR² and for ρ=3m_c/4πR_e³

For equilibrium, the requirement is that dH=dΩ in the minimum condition dH+dΩ=0.
This gives: dH+dΩ=3kTR²/R_e³ - 16G_oπ²ρ²R⁴/3=0 and the ylemic radius as:

R_ylem=√{kTR_e/G_om_c²}

as the Jeans-Length precursor or progenitor for subsequent stellar and galactic generation.

The ylemic (Jeans) radii are all independent of the mass of the star as a function of its nuclear generated temperature. Applied to the protostars of the vortex neutron matter or ylem, the radii are all neutron star radii and define a specific range of radii for the gravitational collapse of the electron degenerate matter.

This spans from the 'First Three Minutes' scenario of the cosmogenesis to 1.1 million seconds (or about 13 days) and encompasses the standard beta decay of the neutron (underpinning radioactivity). The upper limit defines a trillion degree temperature and a radius of over 40 km; the trivial Schwarzschild solution gives a typical ylem radius of so 7.4 kilometers and the lower limit defines the 'mysterious' planetesimal limit as 1.8 km.

For long a cosmological conundrum, it could not be modelled just how the molecular and electromagnetic forces applicable to conglomerate matter distributions (say gaseous hydrogen as cosmic dust) on the quantum scale of molecules could become strong enough to form say 1km mass concentrations, required for 'ordinary' gravity to assume control.

The ylem radii's lower limit is defined in this cosmology then show, that it is the ylemic temperature of the 1.2 billion degrees K, which perform the trick under the Ylem-Jeans formulation and which then is applied to the normal collapse of hydrogenic atoms in summation.

The stellar evolution from the ylemic (dineutronic) templates is well established in QR and confirms most of the Standard Model's ideas of nucleosynthesis and the general Temperature cosmology. The standard model is correct in the temperature assignment, but is amiss in the corresponding 'size-scales' for the cosmic expansion.

The Big Bang cosmogenesis describes the universe as a Planck-Black Body Radiator, which sets the Cosmic-Microwave-Black Body Background Radiation Spectrum (CMBBR) as a function of n as T⁴=18.2(n+1)²/n³ and derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law and the related statistical frequency distributions.

We have the GR metric for Schwarzschild-Black Hole Evolution as R_S=2GM/c² as a function of the star's Black Hole's mass M and we have the ylemic Radius as a function of temperature only as R_ylem√(kT.R_e³/G_om_c²).

The nucleonic mass-seed m_c=m_P.Alpha⁹ and the product G_om_c² is a constant in the partitioned n-evolution of

m_c(n)=Yⁿ.m_c and G(n)=G_o.Xⁿ.

Identifying the ylemic Radius with the Schwarzschild Radius then indicates a specific mass a specific temperature and a specific radius.

Those we call the Chandrasekhar Parameters:
M_Chandra=1.5 solar Masses=3x10³⁰ kg and R_Chandra=2G_oM_Chandra/c² or 7407.40704..metres, which is the typical neutron star radius inferred today.

T_Chandra=R_Chandra².G_om_c²/kR_e³ =1.985x10¹⁰ K for Electron Radius R_e and Boltzmann's Constant k.

Those Chandrasekhar parameters then define a typical neutron star with a uniform temperature of 20 billion K at the white dwarf limit of ordinary stellar nucleosynthetic evolution (Hertzsprung-Russell or HR-diagram).
The Radius for the massparametric Universe is given in R(n)=R_max(1-n/(n+1)) correlating the ylemic temperatures as the 'uniform' CMBBR-background and we can follow the evolution of the ylemic radius via the approximation:

R_ylem=0.05258..√T=(0.0753).[(n+1)²/n³]^[1/8]

R_ylem(n_present=1.1324..)=0.0868 m* for a T_ylem(n_present )=2.73 K for the present time
t_present=n_present/H_o.

What then is n_Chandra?
This would describe the size of the universe as the uniform temperature CMBBR today manifesting as the largest stars, mapped however onto the ylemic neutron star evolution as the protostars (say as n_Chandra'), defined not in manifested mass (say neutron conglomerations), but as a quark-strange plasma, (defined in QR as the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE).

R(n_Chandra')=R_max(n_Chandra'/(n_Chandra'+1))=7407.40741.. for n_Chandra'=4.64x10^-23 and so a time of t_Chandra'=n_Chandra'/H_o=n_Chandra'/1.88x10^-18=2.47x10^-5 seconds.

QR defines the Weyl-Temperature limit for Bosonic Unification as 1.9 nanoseconds at a temperature of 1.4x10²⁰ Kelvin and the weak-electromagnetic unification at 1/365 seconds at T=3.4x10¹⁵ K.

So we place the first ylemic protostar after the bosonic unification (before which the plenum was defined as undifferentiated 'bosonic plasma'), but before the electro-weak unification, which defined the Higgs-Bosonic restmass induction via the weak interaction vector-bosons and allowing the dineutrons to be born.

The universe was so 15 km across, when its ylemic 'concentrated' VPE-Temperature was so 20 Billion K and we find the CMBBR in the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law as:
T⁴=18.20(n+1)²/n³=1.16x10¹⁷ Kelvin.

So the thermodynamic temperature for the expanding universe was so 5.85 Million times greater than the ylemic VPE-Temperature; and implying that no individual ylem stars could yet form from the mass seedling M_o.

The universe's expansion however cooled the CMBBR background and we to calculate the scale of the universe corresponding to this ylemic scenario; we simply calculate the 'size' for the universe at T_Chandra=20 Billion K for T_Chandra⁴ and we then find n_Chandra=4.89x10^-14 and t_Chandra=26,065 seconds or so 7.24 hours.

The Radius R(n_Chandra)=7.81x10¹² metres or 7.24 lighthours.
This is about 52 Astronomical Units and an indicator for the largest possible star in terms of radial extent and the 'size' of a typical solar system, encompassed by supergiants on the HR-diagram.

We so know that the ylemic temperature decreases in direct proportion to the square of the ylemic radius and one hitherto enigmatic aspect in cosmology relates to this in the planetesimal limit. Briefly, a temperature of so 1.2 billion degrees defines an ylemic radius of 1.8 km as the dineutronic limit for proto-neutron stars contracting from so 80 km down to this size just 1.1 million seconds or so 13 days after the Big Bang.

This then 'explains' why chunks of matter can conglomerate via molecular and other adhesive interactions towards this size, where then the accepted gravity is strong enough to build planets and moons. It works, because the ylemic template is defined in subatomic parameters reflecting the mesonic-inner and leptonic outer ring boundaries, the planetesimal limit being the leptonic mapping. So neutrino- and quark blueprints micromacro dance their basic definition as the holographic projections of the spacetime quanta.

Now because the Electron Radius is directly proportional to the linearised wormhole perimeter and then the Compton Radius via Alpha in R_e=10¹⁰λ_wormhole/360=e*/2c²=Alpha.R_Compton, the Chandrasekhar White Dwarf limit should be doubled to reflect the protonic diameter mirrored in the classical electron radius.

Hence any star experiencing electron degeneracy is actually becoming ylemic or dineutronic, the boundary for this process being the Chandrasekhar mass. This represents the subatomic mapping of the first Bohr orbit collapsing onto the leptonic outer ring in the quarkian wave-geometry.
But this represents the Electron Radius as a Protonic Diameter and the Protonic Radius must then indicate the limit for the scale where proton degeneracy would have to enter the scenario. As the proton cannot degenerate in that way, the neutron star must enter Black Hole phasetransition at the R_e/2 scale, corresponding to a mass of 8M_Chandra=24x10³⁰ kg* or 12 solar masses.

The maximum ylemic radius so is found from the constant density proportion ρ=M/V:
(R_ylemmax/R_e)³=M_Chandra/m_c for R_ylemmax=40.1635 km.

The corresponding ylemic temperature is 583.5 Billion K for a CMBBR-time of 287 seconds or so 4.8 minutes from a n=5.4x10^-16, when the universe had a diameter of so 173 Million km.
But for a maximum nuclear compressibility for the protonic radius, we find:

(R_ylemmax/R_e)³=8M_Chandra/m_c for R_ylemmax=80.327 km, a ylemic temperature of 2,334 Billion K for a n-cycletime of 8.5x10^-17 and a CMBBR-time of so 45 seconds and when the universe had a radius of 13.6 Million km or was so 27 Million km across.

The first ylemic protostar vortex was at that time manifested as the ancestor for all neutron star generations to follow. This vortex is described in a cosmic string encircling a spherical region so 160 km across and within a greater universe of diameter 27 Million km which carried a thermodynamic temperature of so 2.33 Trillion Kelvin at that point in the cosmogenesis.

This vortex manifested as a VPE concentration after the expanding universe had cooled to allow the universe to become transparent from its hitherto defining state of opaqueness and a time known as the decoupling of matter (in the form of the M_o seedling partitioned in m_c's) from the radiation pressure of the CMBBR photons.

The temperature for the decoupling is found in the galactic scale-limit modular dual to the wormhole geodesic as 1/λ_wormhole=λ_antiwormhole=λ_{galaxyserpent}=10²² metres or so 1.06 Million ly and its luminosity attenuation in the 1/e proportionality for then 388,879 lightyears as a decoupling time n_decoupling.

A maximum galactic halo limit is modulated in 2πλ_antiwormhole metres in the linearisation of the Planck-length encountered before in an earlier discussion.

R(n_decoupling)=R_max(n_decoupling/(n_decouplingc+1))=10²² metres for n_decoupling=6.26x10^-5 and so for a CMBBR-Temperature of about T=2935 K for a galactic protocore then attenuated in so 37% for n_{decouplingmin}=1.0x10^-6 for R=λ_antiwormhole/2π and n_{decouplingmax}=3.9x10^-4 for R=2πλ_antiwormhole and for temperatures of so 65,316 K and 744 K respectively, descriptive of the temperature modulations between the galactic cores and the galactic halos.

So a CMBBR-temperature of so 65,316 K at a time of so 532 Billion seconds or 17,000 years defined the initialisation of the VPE and the birth of the first ylemic protostars as a decoupling minimum. The ylemic mass currents were purely monopolic and known as superconductive cosmic strings, consisting of nucleonic neutrons, each of mass m_c.

If we assign this timeframe to the maximised ylemic radius and assign our planetesimal limit of fusion temperature 1.2 Billion K as a corresponding minimum; then this planetesimal limit representing the onset of stellar fusion in a characteristic temperature, should indicate the first protostars at a temperature of the CMBBR of about 744 Kelvin.

The universe had a tremperature of 744 K for n_{decouplingmax}=3.9x10^-4 for R=2πλ_antiwormhole and this brings us to a curvature radius of so 6.6 Million lightyears and an 'ignition-time' for the first physical ylemic neutron stars as first generation protostars of so 7 Million years after the Big Bang.

The important cosmological consideration is that of distance-scale modulation.
The Black Hole Schwarzschild metric is the inverse of the galactic scale metric.
The linearisation of the Planck-String as the Weyl-Geodesic and so the wormhole radius in the curvature radius R(n) is modular dual and mirrored in inversion in the manifestation of galactic structure with a nonluminous halo a luminous attenuated diameter-bulge and a superluminous (quasar or White Hole Core).

The core-bulge ratio will so reflect the eigenenergy quantum of the wormhole as heterotic Planck-Boson-String or as the magnetocharge as 1/500, being the mapping of the Planck-Length-Bounce as e=l_P.c²√Alpha onto the electron radius in e*=2R_e.c².


Hypersphere volumes and the mass of the Tau-neutrino

Consider the universe's thermodynamic expansion to proceed at an initializing time (and practically at lightspeed for the lightpath x=ct describing the hypersphere radii) to from a single spacetime quantum with a quantized toroidal volume 2π²r_w³ and where r_w is the characteristic wormhole radius for this basic building unit for a quantized universe (say in string parameters given in the Planck scale and its transformations).

At a time t_G, say so 18.85 minutes later, the count of space time quanta can be said to be 9.677x10¹⁰² for a universal 'total hypersphere radius' of about r_G=3.39x10¹¹ meters and for a G-Hypersphere volume of so 7.69x10³⁵cubic meters.

{This radius is about 2.3 Astronomical Units (AUs) and about the distance of the Asteroid Belt from the star Sol in a typical (our) solar system.}

This modelling of a mapping of the quantum-microscale onto the cosmological macroscale should now indicate the mapping of the wormhole scale onto the scale of the sun itself.

r_w/R_Sun(i)=R_e/r_E for R_Sun(i)=r_wr_E/R_e=1,971,030 meters. This gives an 'inner' solar core of diameter about 3.94x10⁶ meters.

As the classical electron radius is quantized in the wormhole radius in the formulation R_e=10¹⁰r_w/360, rendering a finestructure for Planck's Constant as a 'superstring-parametric': h=r_w/2R_ec³; the 'outer' solar scale becomes R_Sun(o)=360R_Sun(i)=7.092x10⁸ meters as the observed radius for the solar disk.

19 seconds later; a F-Hypersphere radius is about r_F=3.45x10¹¹ meters for a F-count of so 1.02x10¹⁰³spacetime quanta. We also define an E-Hypersphere radius at r_E=3.44x10¹⁴ meters and an E-count of so 10¹¹² to circumscribe this 'solar system' in so 230 AU.

We so have 4 hypersphere volumes, based on the singularity-unit and magnified via spacetime quantization in the hyperspheres defined in counters G, F and E. We consider these counters as somehow fundamental to the universe's expansion, serving as boundary conditions in some manner. As counters, those googol-numbers can be said to be defined algorithmically and independent on mensuration physics of any kind.



The mapping of the atomic nucleus onto the thermodynamic universe of the hyperspheres

Should we consider the universe to follow some kind of architectural blueprint; then we might attempt to use our counters to be isomorphic (same form or shape) in a one-to-one mapping between the macrocosmos and the microcosmos. So we define a quantum geometry for the nucleus in the simplest atom, say Hydrogen. The hydrogenic nucleus is a single proton of quark-structure udu and which we assign a quantum geometric template of Kernel-InnerRing-OuterRing (K-IR-OR), say in a simple model of concentricity.

We set the up-quarks (u) to become the 'smeared out core' in say a tripartition uuu so allowing a substructure for the down-quark (d) to be u+InnerRing. A down-quark so is a unitary ring coupled to a kernel-quark. The proton's quark-content so can be rewritten and without loss of any of the properties associated with the quantum conservation laws; as proton-> udu->uuu+IR=KKK+IR. We may now label the InnerRing as Mesonic and the OuterRing as Leptonic.

The OuterRing is so definitive for the strange quark in quantum geometric terms: s=u+OR.
A neutron's quark content so becomes neutron=dud=KIR.K.KIR with a 'hyperon resonance' in the lambda=sud=KOR.K.KIR and so allowing the neutron's beta decay to proceed in disassociation from a nucleus (where protons and neutrons bind in meson exchange); i.e. in the form of 'free neutrons'.

The neutron decays in the oscillation potential between the mesonic inner ring and the leptonic outer ring as the 'ground-energy' eigenstate.

​

There actually exist three uds-quark states which decay differently via strong, electromagnetic and weak decay rates in the uds (Sigma^o Resonance); usd (Sigma^o) and the sud (Lambda^o) in increasing stability.
This quantum geometry then indicates the behaviour of the triple-uds decay from first principles, whereas the contemporary standard model does not, considering the u-d-s quark eigenstates to be quantum geometrically undifferentiated.
The nuclear interactions, both strong and weak are confined in a ' Magnetic Asymptotic Confinement Limit
coinciding with the Classical Electron Radius R_e=ke²/m_ec² and in a scale of so 3 Fermi or 2.8x10^-15 meters. At a distance further away from this scale, the nuclear interaction strength vanishes rapidly.

The wavenature of the nucleus is given in the Compton-Radius R_c=h/2πmc with m the mass of the nucleus, say a proton; the latter so having R_c=2x10^-16 meters or so 0.2 fermi.

The wave-matter (after de Broglie generalising wavespeed v_dB from c in R_cc) then relates the classical electron radius as the 'confinement limit' to the Compton scale in the electromagnetic finestructure constant in R_e=Alpha.R_c.

The extension to the Hydrogen-Atom is obtained in the expression R_e=Alpha².R_Bohr1 for the first Bohr-Radius as the 'ground-energy' of so 13.7 eV at a scale of so 10^-11 to 10^-10 meters (Angstroems).
These 'facts of measurements' of the standard models now allow our quantum geometric correspondences to assume cosmological significance in their isomorphic mapping. We denote the OuterRing as the classical electron radius and introduce the InnerRing as a mesonic scale contained within the geometry of the proton and all other elementary baryonic- and hadronic particles.

Firstly, we define a mean macro-mesonic radius as: r_M=½(r_F+r_G)~ 3.42x10¹¹ meters and set the macro-leptonic radius to r_E=3.44x10¹⁴ meters.
Secondly, we map the macroscale onto the microscale, say in the simple proportionality relation, using
(de)capitalised symbols: R_e/R_m=r_E/r_M.

We can so solve for the micro-mesonic scale R_m=R_e.r_M/r_E ~ 2.76x10^-18 meters.
So reducing the apparent measured 'size' of a proton in a factor about about 1000 gives the scale of the subnuclear mesonic interaction, say the strong interaction coupling by pions.


The Higgsian Scalar-Neutrino

The (anti)neutrinos are part of the electron mass in a decoupling process between the kernel and the rings. Neutrino mass is so not cosmologically significant and cannot be utilized in 'missing mass' models'.
We may define the kernel-scale as that of the singular spacetime-quantum unit itself, namely as the wormhole radius r_w=10^-22/2π meters.

Before the decoupling between kernel and rings, the kernel-energy can be said to be strong-weakly coupled or unified to encompass the gauge-gluon of the strong interaction and the gauge-weakon of the weak interaction defined in a coupling between the OuterRing and the Kernel and bypassing the mesonic InnerRing.

So for matter, a W-Minus ( weakon) must consist of a coupled lepton part, yet linking to the strong interaction via the kernel part. If now the colour-charge of the gluon transmutates into a 'neutrino-colour-charge'; then this decoupling will not only define the mechanics for the strong-weak nuclear unification coupling; but also the energy transformation of the gauge-colour charge into the gauge-lepton charge.

There are precisely 8 gluonic transitive energy permutation eigenstates between a 'radiative-additive' Planck energy in W(hite)=E=hf and an 'inertial-subtractive' Einstein energy in B(lack)=E=mc², which describe the baryonic- and hyperonic 'quark-sectors' in: mc²=BBB, BBW, WBB, BWB, WBW, BWW, WWB and WWW=hf.
The permutations are cyclic and not linearly commutative. For mesons (quark-antiquark eigenstates), the permutations are BB, BW, WB and WW in the SU(2) and SU(3) Unitary Symmetries.

So generally, we may state, that the gluon is unfied with a weakon before decoupling; this decoupling 'materialising' energy in the form of mass, namely the mass of the measured 'weak-interaction-bosons' of the standard model (W^- for charged matter; W⁺ for charged antimatter and Z^o for neutral mass-currents say).

Experiment shows, that a W^- decays into spin-aligned electron-antineutrino or muon-antineutrino or tauon-antineutrino pairings under the conservation laws for momentum and energy.
So, using our quantum geometry, we realise, that the weakly decoupled electron must represent the OuterRing, and just as shown in the analysis of QED ( Quantum-Electro-Dynamics). Then it can be inferred, that the Electron's Antineutrino represents a transformed and materialised gluon via its colourcharge, now decoupled from the kernel.

Then the OuterRing contracts (say along its magnetoaxis defining its asymptotic confinement); in effect 'shrinking the electron' in its inertial and charge- properties to its experimentally measured 'point-particle-size'. Here we define this process as a mapping between the Electronic wavelength 2πR_e and the wormhole perimeter λ_w=2πr_w.

But in this process of the 'shrinking' classical electron radius towards the gluonic kernel (say); the mesonic ring will be encountered and it is there, that any mass-inductions should occur to differentiate a massless lepton gauge-eigenstate from that manifested by the weakon precursors.

{Note: Here the W- inducing a lefthanded neutron to decay weakly into a lefthanded proton, a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino. Only lefthanded particles decay weakly in CP-parity-symmetry violation, effected by neutrino-gauge definitions from first principles}.

This so defines a neutrino-oscillation potential at the InnerRing-Boundary. Using our proportions and assigning any neutrino-masses m_n as part of the electronmass m_e, gives the following proportionality as the mass eigenvalue of the Tau-(Anti)Neutrino as Higgsian Mass Induction in the Weak Nuclear Interaction at the Mesonic Inner Ring Boundary within the subatomic quantum geometry utilized as the dynamic interaction space:

m_Higgs/Tauon=m_eλ_w.r_E/(2πr_MR_e) ~ 5.4x10^-36 kg or 3.0 eV*.

So we have derived, from first principles, a (anti)neutrinomass eigenstate energy level of 3 eV as the appropriate energy level for any (anti)neutrino matter interaction within the subatomic dynamics of the nuclear interaction.

This confirms the Mainz, Germany Result as the upper limit for neutrino masses resulting from ordinary Beta-Decay and indicates the importance of the primordial beta-decay for the cosmogenesis and the isomorphic scale mappings stated above.

The hypersphere intersection of the G- and F-count of the thermodynamic expansion of the mass-parametric universe so induces a neutrino-mass of 3 eV* at the 2.76x10^-18 meter marker.

The more precise G-F differential in terms of eigenenergy is 0.052 eV as the mass-eigenvalue for the Higgs-(Anti)neutrino (which is scalar of 0-spin and constituent of the so called Higgs Boson as the kernel-Eigenstate). This has been experimentally verified in the Super-Kamiokande (Japan) neutrino experiments published in 1998 and in subsequent neutrino experiments around the globe, say Sudbury, KamLAND, Dubna, MinibooNE and MINOS.

Recalling the Cosmic scale radii for the initial manifestation of the primordial 'Free Neutron (Beta-Minus) Decay', we rewrite the Neutrino-Mass-Induction formula:

r_E = 3.43597108x10¹⁴ meters and an E-count of so 1.00x10¹¹² spacetime quanta

mn_Higgs-E=mn_electron=m_eλ_w.{r_E/r_E}(2πR_e) ~ 5.323x10^-39 kg* or 0.003 eV* as Weak Interaction Higgs Mass induction.

r_F = 3.45107750x10¹¹ metres for the F-count of so 1.02x10¹⁰³ spacetime quanta
mn_Higgs-F=mn_muon=m_eλ_w.{r_E/r_F}/(2πR_e) ~ 5.300x10^-36 kg* or 2.969 eV* as Weak Interaction Higgs Mass induction.

r_G = 3.39155801x10¹¹ metres for the G-count of so 9.68x10¹⁰² spacetime quanta
mn_Higgs-G=mn_tauon=m_eλ_w.{r_E/r_G}(2πR_e) ~ 5.393x10^-36 kg* or 3.021 eV* as Weak Interaction Higgs Mass Induction.

The mass difference for the Muon-Tau-(Anti)Neutrino Oscillation, then defines the Mesonic Inner Ring Higgs Induction:

mn_Higgs=m_eλ_w.r_E{1/r_G-1/r_F}/(2πR_e) ~ 9.301x10^-38 kg* or 0.0521 eV* as the Basic Cosmic (Anti)Neutrino Mass.

This Higgs-Neutrino-Induction is 'twinned' meaning that this energy can be related to the energy of so termed 'slow- or thermal neutrons' in a coupled energy of so twice 0.0253 eV for a thermal equilibrium at so 20° Celsius and a rms-standard-speed of so 2200 m/s from the Maxwell statistical distributions for the kinematics.



Sterile neutrino back from the dead
22 June 2010 by David Shiga
http://www.newscientist.com/issue/2766

A ghostly particle given up for dead is showing signs of life.

Not only could this "sterile" neutrino be the stuff of dark matter, thought to make up the bulk of our universe, it might also help to explain how an excess of matter over antimatter arose in our universe.
Neutrinos are subatomic particles that rarely interact with ordinary matter. They are known to come in three flavours – electron, muon and tau – with each able to spontaneously transform into another.
In the 1990s, results from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico suggested there might be a fourth flavour: a "sterile" neutrino that is even less inclined to interact with ordinary matter than the others.

Hasty dismissal

Sterile neutrinos would be big news because the only way to detect them would be by their gravitational influence – just the sort of feature needed to explain dark matter.
Then in 2007 came the disheartening news that the Mini Booster Neutrino Experiment (MiniBooNE, pictured) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, had failed to find evidence of them.
But perhaps sterile neutrinos were dismissed too soon. While MiniBooNE used neutrinos to look for the sterile neutrino,
LSND used antineutrinos – the antimatter equivalent. Although antineutrinos should behave exactly the same as neutrinos, just to be safe, the MiniBooNE team decided to repeat the experiment – this time with antineutrinos.

Weird excess

Lo and behold, the team saw muon antineutrinos turning into electron antineutrinos at a higher rate than expected – just like at LSND. MiniBooNE member Richard Van de Water reported the result at a neutrino conference in Athens, Greece, on 14 June.
The excess could be because muon antineutrinos turn into sterile neutrinos before becoming electron antineutrinos, says Fermilab physicist Dan Hooper, who is not part of MiniBooNE. "This is very, very weird," he adds.
Although it could be a statistical fluke, Hooper suggests that both MiniBooNE results could be explained if antineutrinos can change into sterile neutrinos but neutrinos cannot – an unexpected difference in behaviour.
The finding would fit nicely with research from the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search, or MINOS, also at Fermilab, which, the same day, announced subtle differences in the oscillation behaviour of neutrinos and antineutrinos.
Antimatter and matter are supposed to behave like mirror versions of each other, but flaws in this symmetry could explain how our universe ended up with more matter.


Neutrinomasses

The (Anti)Neutrino Energy at the R_E nexus for R_E=r_w∛(26x65⁶¹) m* and
for mn_Higgs-E=mn_electron=l_wh.Alpha/4p²R_e²c=30e²l_w/2pR_e²c or 15l]_w{Monopole GUT masses ec}/pR_e² = 2.982...10^-3 eV*.
This can also be written as mn_Higgs-E=mn_electron=mn_Tauon² to define the 'squared' Higgs (Anti)Neutrino eigenstate from its templated form of the quantum geometry in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).

Subsequently, the Muon (Anti)Neutrino Higgs Induction mass becomes defined in the difference between the masses of the Tau-(Anti)Neutrino and the Higgs (Anti)Neutrino.

mn_Tauon = B⁴G⁴R⁴[0]+B²G²R²[-½]=B⁶G⁶R⁶[-½] = √(mn_electron)=√(0.002982)=0.0546... eV*

mn_Higgs= B⁴G⁴R⁴[0] = m_eλ_w.r_E{1/r_G-1/r_F}/(2πR_e) ~ 9.301x10^-38 kg* or 0.0521... eV*
mn_Muon = B²G²R²[-½] = √(mn_Tauon² - mn_Higgs²) = √(0.00298-0.00271) = √(0.00027) = 0.0164... eV*
mn_Electron = B²G²R²[-½] = (mn_Tauon)²= (0.054607...)²=0.002982... eV*

This energy self state for the Electron (Anti)Neutrino then is made manifest in the Higgs Mass Induction at the Mesonic Inner Ring or IR as the squared mass differential between two (anti)neutrino self states as:
(mn₃ + mn₂).(mn₃ - mn₂) = mn₃² - mn₂² = 0.002981...eV*² to reflect the 'squared' energy self state of the scalar Higgs (Anti)Neutrino as compared to the singlet energy Eigen state of the base (anti)neutrinos for the 3 leptonic families of electron-positron and the muon-antimuon and the tauon-antitauon.

The Electron-(Anti)Neutrino is massless as base-neutrinoic weakon eigenstate and inducted at R_E at 0.00298 eV*.
The Muon-(Anti)Neutrino is also massless as base-neutrinoic weakon eigenstate and inducted at the Mesonic Ring F-Boundary at 2.969 eV* with an effective Higgsian mass induction of 0.0164 eV*.

The Tauon-(Anti)Neutrino is not massless with inertial eigenstate inducted at the Mesonic Ring G-Boundary at 3.021 eV* and meaned at 3.00 eV* as √(0.0521²+0.0164²) = 0.0546 eV* as the square root value of the ground state of the Higgs inertia induction. The neutrino flavour mechanism, based on the Electron (Anti)Neutrino so becomes identical in the Weakon Tauon-Electron-Neutrino oscillation to the Scalar Muon-Higgs-Neutrino oscillation.

The weakon kernel-eigenstates are 'squared' or doubled (2x2=2+2) in comparison with the gluonic-eigenstate (one can denote the colourcharges as (R²G²B²)[½] and as (RGB)[1] respectively say and with the [] bracket denoting gauge-spin and RGB meaning colours Red-Green-Blue).
The scalar Higgs-Anti(Neutrino) becomes then defined in: (R⁴G⁴B⁴)[0] and the Tauon Anti(Neutrino) in (R⁶G⁶B⁶)[½].

The twinned neutrino state so becomes MANIFESTED in a coupling of the scalar Higgs-Neutrino with a massless base neutrino in a (R⁶G⁶B⁶)[0+½]) mass-induction template.
The Higgs-Neutrino is bosonic and so not subject to the Pauli Exclusion Principle; but quantized in the form of the FG-differential of the 0.0521 Higgs-Restmass-Induction.
Subsequently all experimentally observed neutrino-oscillations should show a stepwise energy induction in units of the Higgs-neutrino mass of 0.0521 eV. This was the case in the Super-Kamiokande experiments; and which was interpreted as a mass-differential between the muonic and tauonic neutrinoic forms.

mn_Higgs + mn_electron = mn_Higgs + (mn_Tauon)² for the 'squared' ground state of a massless base (anti)neutrino for a perturbation Higgsian (anti)neutrino in (mn_Tauon)² = (mn_Higgs + d)² = mn_Electron for the quadratic mn_Higgs² + 2mn_Higgsd + d² = 0.002982 from (mn_Higgs + d) = √(mn_electron) and for a d = √(mn_electron) - mn_Higgs = mn_Tauon - mn_Higgs = 0.0546-0.0521 = 0.0025.

mn_Higgs + d = 0.0521 + 0.0025 = (mn_Higgs) + (mn_electron) - 0.00048 = mn_Tauon = 0.0521+0.00298 - 0.00048 + ... = 0.0546 eV* as a perturbation expression for the 'squared' scalar Higgs (Anti)Neutrino.

(mn_Muon - mn_Electron){(mn_Muon + mn_Electron) - (mn_Muon - mn_Electron)} = 2mn_Electron(mn_Muon - mn_Electron)
as the squared mass difference:

mn_Muon² - mn_Electron² = 2mn_Electron(mn_Muon - mn_Electron) + (mn_Muon - mn_Electron)²

and {mn_Muon² - mn_Electron²} - mn_Muon² + 2mn_Muonn_Electron - mn_Electron² = 2mn_Muonmn_Electron - 2mn_Electron² = ({3mn_Electron}² - 0²)
= (0.00894..)² = 7.997..x10^-5 eV^2* as the KamLAND 2005 neutrino mass induction value for 11mn_Electron = 2mn_Muon.


For 3 (anti)neutrinos then, the cosmological summation lower and upper bounds for (anti)neutrino oscillations are:
0 + mn_{electron-muon} + mn_{electron-tauon} + mn_muon-tauon = 3(0.002982) = 0.00895 eV* and 3(0.0030+0.0546) = 3(0.0576) = 0.1728 eV* or 0.1724 eV [SI] respectively.

Inclusion of the scalar Higgs (anti)neutrino as a fourth (anti)neutrino inertial self state extends this upper boundary by 0.0521 eV* to 0.2249 eV* or 0.2243 eV [SI].

Sn = mn_Electron + mn_Muon + mn_Higgs+ mn_Tauon = 0.0546..+0.0521..+0.0164..+0.0030 = 0.1261 eV* or 0.1258 eV.

(Starunits[*] calibrate as {SI}: {J}=0.9948356[J*]; {s}=0.99902301[s*]; {m}=0.9983318783[m*]; {kg}=0.9962135[kg*];
{C}=0.997296076[C*]; {eV}=0.99753285[eV*])

In terms of the Higgs Mass Induction and so their inertial states, the Neutrinos are their own antiparticles and so Majorana defined; but in terms of their basic magneto charged nature within the Unified Filed of Quantum Relativity, the Neutrinos are different from their AntiNeutrino antiparticles in their Dirac definition of R²G²B²[+1] for the AntiNeutrinos and in B²G²R²[-1] for the Neutrinos.


Mass

The Standard Model of particle physics assumed that neutrinos are massless. However the experimentally established phenomenon of neutrino oscillation, which mixes neutrino flavour states with neutrino mass states (analogously to CKM mixing), requires neutrinos to have nonzero masses.^[20]

Massive neutrinos were originally conceived by Bruno Pontecorvo in the 1950s. Enhancing the basic framework to accommodate their mass is straightforward by adding a right-handed Lagrangian. This can be done in two ways. If, like other fundamental Standard Model particles, mass is generated by the Dirac mechanism, then the framework would require an SU(2) singlet. This particle would have no other Standard Model interactions (apart from the Yukawa interactions with the neutral component of the Higgs doublet), so is called a sterile neutrino. Or, mass can be generated by the Majorana mechanism, which would require the neutrino and antineutrino to be the same particle.

The strongest upper limit on the masses of neutrinos comes from cosmology: the Big Bang model predicts that there is a fixed ratio between the number of neutrinos and the number of photons in the cosmic microwave background. If the total energy of all three types of neutrinos exceeded an average of 50 eV per neutrino, there would be so much mass in the universe that it would collapse.^[37] This limit can be circumvented by assuming that the neutrino is unstable; however, there are limits within the Standard Model that make this difficult. A much more stringent constraint comes from a careful analysis of cosmological data, such as the cosmic microwave background radiation, galaxy surveys, and the Lyman-alpha forest. These indicate that the summed masses of the three neutrinos must be less than 0.3 eV.^[38]

In 1998, research results at the Super-Kamiokande neutrino detector determined that neutrinos can oscillate from one flavor to another, which requires that they must have a nonzero mass.^[39] While this shows that neutrinos have mass, the absolute neutrino mass scale is still not known. This is because neutrino oscillations are sensitive only to the difference in the squares of the masses.^[40]
The best estimate of the difference in the squares of the masses of mass eigenstates 1 and 2 was published by KamLAND in 2005: |Δm₂₁²| = 0.000079 eV².^[41]

In 2006, the MINOS experiment measured oscillations from an intense muon neutrino beam, determining the difference in the squares of the masses between neutrino mass eigenstates 2 and 3. The initial results indicate |Δm₃₂²| = 0.0027 eV², consistent with previous results from Super-Kamiokande.^[42]

Since |Δm₃₂²| is the difference of two squared masses, at least one of them has to have a value which is at least the square root of this value. Thus, there exists at least one neutrino mass eigenstate with a mass of at least 0.04 eV.^[43]

In 2009, lensing data of a galaxy cluster were analyzed to predict a neutrino mass of about 1.5 eV.^[44]
All neutrino masses are then nearly equal, with neutrino oscillations of order meV. They lie below the Mainz-Troitsk upper bound of 2.2 eV for the electron antineutrino.^[45]
The latter will be tested in 2015 in the KATRIN experiment, that searches for a mass between 0.2 eV and 2 eV.

A number of efforts are under way to directly determine the absolute neutrino mass scale in laboratory experiments. The methods applied involve nuclear beta decay (KATRIN and MARE) or neutrinoless double beta decay (e.g. GERDA, CUORE/Cuoricino, NEMO-3 and others).

On 31 May 2010, OPERA researchers observed the first tau neutrino candidate event in a muon neutrino beam, the first time this transformation in neutrinos had been observed, providing further evidence that they have mass.^[46]

In July 2010 the 3-D MegaZ DR7 galaxy survey reported that they had measured a limit of the combined mass of the three neutrino varieties to be less than 0.28 eV.^[47]

A tighter upper bound yet for this sum of masses, 0.23 eV, was reported in March 2013 by the Planck collaboration,^[48]
whereas a February 2014 result estimates the sum as 0.320 ± 0.081 eV based on discrepancies between the cosmological consequences implied by Planck's detailed measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background and predictions arising from observing other phenomena, combined with the assumption that neutrinos are responsible for the observed weaker gravitational lensing than would be expected from massless neutrinos.^[49]

If the neutrino is a Majorana particle, the mass can be calculated by finding the half life of neutrinoless double-beta decay of certain nuclei. The lowest upper limit, on the Majorana mass of the neutrino, has been set by EXO-200 0.140–0.380 eV.^[50]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Mass

Shiloh Za-Rah

​

{1} Matter interacts with matter based Anti-Neutrinos via Unified Weakon Action {W^-+W⁺}

Protons transform into neutrons with antimatter positrons, the latter which annihilate with electrons produced by the decay of 'free neutrons' back into protons, electrons and anti-neutrinos and then with energy-momentum conserving photons and so ending the process with the same components it began with.
{Mass produced photons (by acceleration of inertia coupled electro charges), have no magnetocharge and so form their own anti-particles; whilst gauge or 'virtual' photons carry cyclic and anticyclic colour charges as consequence of the matter-antimatter asymmetry}.

Antin_electron[+½] + Proton p⁺[-½] + VPE[0] ⇨ Anti-Neutrino Spin Induction to 'flipped' Electron of the partial Matter W-minus Weakon manifesting the other part as Antineutrino Scalar
Antin_electron[0] + {Antin_electron[+½] + Electron e^-[+½+½]} + Graviphoton[-1] + {n_electron[-½] + Positron e⁺[-½]} + Graviphoton[+1] + p⁺[-½]

⇨ {Antin_electron[+½] + n_electron[-½]}-Kernel VPE[0] + e⁺[+½] + {p⁺[-½] +OR^-[0]} ⇨ Kernel-VPE[0] + Neutron^o[-½] + Positron e⁺[+½], the scalar Electron Outer Ring being absorbed in the Proton spin as the resultant Neutron quantum spin

⇨ Kernel-VPE[0] + {p⁺[-½] + e^-[-½] + e⁺[+½] + Antin_electron[+½]} ⇨ (KKK+OR)-VPE[0] + p⁺[-½] + Antin_electron[+½] ⇨ Antin_electron[+½] + Proton p⁺[-½] + Photon[-1] + Photon[+1] in Pair-Annihilation tranforming the Mass Energy {E=mc² into Radiation Energy E=hf for the Electron-Positron Matter-Antimatter Interaction.



{2} Matter interacts with antimatter based Neutrinos via Unified Weakon Action {W^-+W⁺}

Neutrons transform into protons with muons, the latter decaying into electrons and anti-neutrinos and neutrinos, so reducing the elementary matter-neutrino interaction to basic neutron beta-minus-deacay with the leptonic coupling between the 'resonance electron' as a basic muon coupled to its neutrino.

n_muon[-½] + Neutron n^o[+½] + VPE[0] ⇨ Neutrino Spin Induction to 'flipped' Anti-Muon of the partial W-plus Weakon manifesting the other part as Neutrino Scalar
n_muon[0] + {n_muon[-½] + Anti-Muon m⁺[-½-½]} + Graviphoton[+1] + {Antin_muon[+½] + Muon m^-[+½]} + Graviphoton[-1] + n^o[+½]

⇨ {Antin_muon[+½] + n_muon[-½]}-Kernel VPE[0] + m^-[-½] + {n^o[+½] +Anti-OR⁺[0]} ⇨ (KKK+OR)-VPE[0] + Proton⁺[+½] + Muon m^-[-½], the scalar Anti-Muon Outer Ring being absorbed in the Neutron spin as the resultant Proton quantum spin

⇨ (KKK+OR)-VPE[0] + {p⁺[+½] + e^-[-½] + Antin_electron[+½] + n_muon[-½]}
⇨ n_muon[-½] + n^o[+½] + (KKK+OR)-VPE[0] in the original neutrino-matter interaction accessing the VPE/ZPE of the UFoQR.



{3} Matter interacts with antimatter based Neutrinos and matter based Antineutrinos in Majorana Weakon Action Electron Capture {W^-+W⁺}

​

An Electron in the inner atomic nucleus is captured by a proton to create a neutron accompanied by an electron neutrino. This requires a u-quark of the proton to transform into a d-quark of the neutron. As the d-quark is a KIR quark of inner mesonic ring of electro charge [+2/3] coupled to the MIR of electro charge [-1], a W-minus weakon must be engaged to couple to a left handed proton via the nonparity of the weak nuclear interaction. However in electron capture a left handed electron neutrino is emitted, requiring the interaction of a W-plus weakon as the kernel gauge for any such right handed antimatter weak decay.
(This 'confusion' as to which weakon becomes engaged in electron capture can be seen in the three diagrams above, two of which infer the left handed W-plus and one the W-minus).

It is in fact a W-minus, that interacts, but coupling to the left handed electron instead of a left handed proton, the latter quantum spinning right handed to allow the charge and spin conservation to crystallize the emission of the left handed electron neutrino.
The W-minus then supplies the required KIR for the up-quark to down-quark transmutation with the gauge spin neutralizer of the left handed Graviphoton [-1] flipping the right handed electron antineutrino constituent of the W-minus into its antiparticular form of a left handed electron neutrino.
Electron capture so displays the Dirac-Majorana nature of the two base neutrinos of the electron-positron and muon-antimuon definition in their massless gauge nature when engaged in the direct interaction or 'tapping' of the UFoQR in the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE/ZPE.
The Majorana-Dirac nature of the base neutrinos then can be said to apply to all (anti)neutrinos carrying mass in their oscillation potential and properties exhibited in their wave mechanical dynamics.

Electron^-[-½] + Proton p⁺[+½] + VPE[0] ⇨ Electron Spin Neutralization as Induction to Matter Parity as OR^- - IR^--VPE Oscillation of the partial W-plus Weakon manifesting the other part as flipped Neutrino from its Dirac AntiNeutrino base template
Electron[0] + {Electron^- [+½-½] + Antin_electron[+½] + Graviphoton[-1]} + Proton p⁺[+½] (proton as u[+½]u[-½].d[+½])

⇨ Proton K[+½]KIR[-½]K [+½] + OR^-[0] + {Antin_electron[+½] + Graviphoton[-1]} = Proton udu[+½] + OR^-[0] + {n_electron[-½]}
⇨ Neutron udd[+½] + VPE[0] + n_electron[-½] = KIR[+½]K[-½]KIR[+½] + n_electron[-½] + VPE[0] = Neutron n^o dud[+½] + n_electron[-½] + VPE[0]

A Magneto axis symmetric Proton K(KIR)K transforms into Magneto axis symmetric Neutron KIR(K)KIR as one of the proton's end Kernel up-quarks 'captures' the Weakonic VPE scalar OR^- Electron Outer Ring in the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.

​

mν_Higgs=m_eλ_w.r_E/(2πr_MR_e){1/r_G-1/r_F} ~ 9.3x10^-38 kg or 0.052 eV.


A Link to the Cosmology of the Higgs Boson
​

Unlike some past announcements centered on the Higgs in the past few years, which have produced as much ambiguity and confusion as anything else, this one did not disappoint. ATLAS physicists said that their most recent data reveal the presence of an unknown particle with a mass of about 126.5 GeV, or 126.5 billion electron-volts. An electron-volt is a physicist’s unit of mass or energy; for comparison, the proton has a mass of about 1 GeV. The CMS collaboration found evidence for a new particle with a mass of 125.3 GeV.

​

"""Then extending the minimum energy levels, like as in the case to calculate the charged weakon gauge field agent energy in the charm and the VPE perturbations as per the table given, specifies the 125 GeV energy level in the Perturbation Integral/Summation:

2x{55.956+5.246+1.606+0.491+0.151+0.046+0.014} GeV* = 127.02 GeV*, which become about 126.71 GeV SI as an UPPER LIMIT for this 'Higgs Boson' at the Dainty quark resonance level from the Thuban Dragon Omni-Science.
Using the 3 Diquark energy levels U,D and S yield 2x{55.956+5.246+1.606} GeV* = 125.62 GeV* and 125.31 GeV SI."""

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=higgs-cern-lhc-discovery

New Particle Resembling Long-Sought Higgs Boson Uncovered at Large Hadron Collider

The CERN collider, the most powerful atom smasher in history, appears to have fulfilled its primary quest.

By John Matson - July 4, 2012

The Higgs Boson at Last? A newfound particle at the Large Hadron Collider looks much like the fabled Higgs »July 12, 2012

​

GATHER ROUND: Dozens of students and physicists gathered at Columbia University's Low Library early Wednesday morning to get the latest news on the Higgs boson.
Image: John Matson
​

NEW YORK—The city that never sleeps was mostly asleep. The bars were closed. But at 4:45 A.M., inside a library on Columbia University's Manhattan campus, Michael Tuts was getting ready to pop the champagne.

The physicist had good reason to celebrate. The massive team of scientists of which he is a part—3,000 researchers working on the ATLAS experiment at Europe's Large Hadron Collider—had just announced the discovery of a new particle. The particle looks an awful lot like the long-sought, and long-hypothetical, Higgs boson, most famous for explaining why elementary particles, such as quarks, have mass. A competing, comparably sized experiment, known as CMS, had arrived at a very similar finding at the collider facility.

Both research teams announced their results during a morning seminar at CERN, the European laboratory for particle physics that operates the Large Hadron Collider, or LHC. But the morning start in Geneva meant that U.S. physicists and other curious observers were tuning in to the announcement during the predawn hours. Tuts and his Columbia colleagues decided to host a viewing party at the campus library, with a live video feed from CERN as well as coffee, cookies, soft drinks and chips. About 50 people, many of them students, turned up for the event, which began around 2:30 A.M.

Unlike some past announcements centered on the Higgs in the past few years, which have produced as much ambiguity and confusion as anything else, this one did not disappoint. ATLAS physicists said that their most recent data reveal the presence of an unknown particle with a mass of about 126.5 GeV, or 126.5 billion electron-volts. An electron-volt is a physicist’s unit of mass or energy; for comparison, the proton has a mass of about 1 GeV. The CMS collaboration found evidence for a new particle with a mass of 125.3 GeV.

Crucially, both teams' findings appear exceptionally robust. In physics terms, evidence for a new particle requires a “3-sigma” measurement, corresponding to a 1-in-740 chance that a random fluke could explain the observations, and a claim of discovery requires a 5-sigma effect, or a 1-in–3.5 million shot that the observations are due to chance. In December representatives of the two experiments had announced what one called “intriguing, tantalizing hints” of something brewing in the collider data. But those hints fell short of the 3-sigma level. The new ATLAS finding met not just that level of significance but cleared the gold standard 5-sigma threshold, and CMS very nearly did as well, with a 4.9-sigma finding.

"This is the payoff," Tuts said after the two teams had announced their latest analyses in the Higgs hunt. "This is what you do it for." Peter Higgs himself, who was in Geneva for the seminar along with other eminent physicists who developed the theory, sounded a similar note after the ATLAS and CMS teams had unveiled their conclusions. "For me, it's really an incredible thing that it's happened in my lifetime," Higgs said to the audience at CERN. He was among a half-dozen physicists who in the 1960s proposed what is now known as the Higgs mechanism, hypothesizing the existence of a field permeating all of space, along with an associated particle. The field imparts particles with mass by exerting a sort of drag on them, slowing them down much like a human being slows down when she tries to walk through water instead of air.

The newfound particle fits the bill for the Higgs boson, but the researchers cautioned that more work is needed to compare the properties of the particle to those predicted for the Higgs. After all, the LHC’s detectors cannot identify the Higgs directly. The LHC accelerates protons to unprecedented energies of four trillion electron-volts (4 TeV) before colliding a clockwise-traveling proton beam with a counterclockwise beam. From the smash-up new particles emerge, some of them existing for just an instant before decaying to other particles.


{Commentary on the Higgs Boson Discovery}
JCER - Vol 2, No 13 (2011) Journal of Consciousness Exploaration & Research


Hints of Higgs Boson at 125 GeV Are Found:
Congratulations to All the People at LHC!
​

​

Refined Higgs Rumours, Higgs Boson Live Blog: Analysis of the CERN Announcement, Has CERN Found the God Particle? A Calculation, Electron Spin Precession for the Time Fractional Pauli Equation, Plane Wave Solutions of Weakened Field Equations in a Plane Symmetric Space-time-II, Plane Wave Solutions of Field Equations of Israel and Trollope's Unified Field Theory in V5, If the LHC Particle Is Real, What Is One of the Other Possibilities than the Higgs Boson? What is Reality in a Holographic World? Searching for Earth’s Twin.

Editor: Huping HU, Ph.D., J.D.; Editor-at-Large: Philip E. Gibbs, Ph.D.

ISSN: 2153-8301
​

Dear Huping!

The Higgs Boson resonance, found by ATLAS and CMS is a diquark resonance.

Excerpt:

"Ok, now I'll print some excerpt for the more technically inclined reader regarding the Higgs Boson and its 'make-up', but highlight the important relevant bit (wrt to this discovery of a 160 GeV Higgs Boson energy, and incorporating the lower energy between 92 GeV and to the upper dainty level at 130 GeV as part of the diquark triplet of the associated topomium energy level) at the end.

In particular, as the bottomium doublet minimum is at 5,245.495 MeV* and the topomium triplet minimum is at 55,956.0 MeV* in terms of their characteristic Kernel-Means, their doubled sum indicates a particle-decay excess at the recently publisized ~125 GeV energy level in 2x(5.246+55.956) GeV* = 122.404 GeV* (or 122.102 GeV SI).
These are the two means from ATLAS {116-130 GeV as 123 GeV} and CMS {115-127 GeV as 121 GeV} respectively.

http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR25.11E.html

Then extending the minimum energy levels, like as in the case to calculate the charged weakon gauge field agent energy in the charm and the VPE perturbations as per the table given, specifies the 125 GeV energy level in the Perturbation Integral/Summation:

2x{55.956+5.246+1.606+0.491+0.151+0.046+0.014} GeV* = 127.02 GeV*, which become about 126.71 GeV SI as an UPPER LIMIT for this 'Higgs Boson' at the Dainty quark resonance level from the Thuban Dragon Omni-Science.
Using the 3 Diquark energy levels U,D and S yield 2x{55.956+5.246+1.606} GeV* = 125.62 GeV* and 125.31 GeV SI.""​

This newest data/discovery about the Higgs Boson aka the 'God-Particle' states, that there seems to be a 'resonance-blip' at an energy of about 160 GeV and as just one of say 5 Higgs Bosons for a 'minimal supersymmetry'.
One, the lowest form of the Higgs Boson is said to be about 110 GeV in the Standard Model. There is also a convergence of the HB to an energy level of so 120 GeV from some other models.
Now the whole thing , according to Quantum Relativity' about the Higgs Boson, is that IT IS NOT a particular particle, but relates to ALL particles in its 'scalar nature' as a restmass inducer.

I have discussed the Higgs Boson many times before; but would like here to show in a very simple analysis that the Higgs Boson MUST show a blip at the 160 GeV mark and due to its nature as a 'polarity' neutraliser (a scalar particle has no charge and no spin, but can be made up of two opposite electric charges and say two opposing chiralities of spin orientations.)

Without worrying about details, first consider the following table which contains all the elementary particles of the standard model of particle physics. The details are found in the Planck-String transformations discussed elesewhere.

The X-Boson's mass is: ([Alpha]xm_ps/[ec]) modulated in (SNI/EMI={Cuberoot of [Alpha]}/[Alpha]), the intrisic unified Interaction-Strength and as the L-Boson's mass in: ([Omega]x([ec])/(m_psxa<2/3>), where the (Cuberoot of [Alpha]² is given by the symbol (a<2/3>)=EMI/SNI).

Ten DIQUARK quark-mass-levels crystallise, including a VPE-level for the K-IR transition and a VPE-level for the IR-OR transition:

VPE-Level [K-IR] is (26.4922-29.9621 MeV*) for K-Mean: (14.11358 MeV*); (2.8181-3.1872 MeV*) for IROR;
VPE-Level [IR-OR] is (86.5263-97.8594 MeV*) for K-Mean: (46.09643 MeV*); (9.2042-10.410 MeV*) for IROR;
UP/DOWN-Level is (282.5263-319.619 MeV*) for K-Mean: (150.5558 MeV*); (30.062-33.999 MeV*) for IROR;
STRANGE-Level is (923.013-1,043.91 MeV*) for K-Mean: (491.7308 MeV*); (98.185-111.05 MeV*) for IROR;
CHARM-Level is (3,014.66-3,409.51 MeV*) for K-Mean: (1,606.043 MeV*); (320.68-362.69 MeV*) for IROR;
BEAUTY-Level is (9,846.18-11,135.8 MeV*) for K-Mean: (5,245.495 MeV*); (1,047.4-1,184.6 MeV*) for IROR;
MAGIC-Level is (32,158.6-36,370.7 MeV*) for K-Mean: (17,132.33 MeV*); (3,420.9-3,868.9 MeV*) for IROR;
DAINTY-Level is (105,033-118,791 MeV*) for K-Mean: (55,956.0 MeV*); (11,173-12,636 MeV*) for IROR;
TRUTH-Level is (343,050-387,982 MeV*) for K-Mean: (182,758.0 MeV*); (36,492-41,271 MeV*) for IROR;
SUPER-Level is (1,120,437-1,267,190 MeV*) for K-Mean: (596,906.8 MeV*); (119,186-134,797 MeV*) for IROR.

The K-Means define individual materialising families of elementary particles;

the (UP/DOWN-Mean) sets the (PION-FAMILY: p^o, p⁺, p^-);
the (STRANGE-Mean) specifies the (KAON-FAMILY: K^o, K⁺, K^-);
the (CHARM-Mean) defines the (J/PSI=J/Y-Charmonium-FAMILY);
the (BEAUTY-Mean) sets the (UPSILON=U-Bottonium-FAMILY);
the (MAGIC-Mean) specifies the (EPSILON=E-FAMILY);
the (DAINTY-Mean) bases the (OMICRON-O-FAMILY);
the (TRUTH-Mean) sets the (KOPPA=J-Topomium-FAMILY) and
the (SUPER-Mean) defines the final quark state in the (HIGGS/CHI=H/C-FAMILY).

The VPE-Means are indicators for average effective quarkmasses found in particular interactions.
Kernel-K-mixing of the wavefunctions gives K(+)=60.210 MeV* and K(-)=31.983 MeV* and the IROR-Ring-Mixing gives (L(+)=6.405 MeV* and L(-)=3.402 MeV*) for a (L-K-Mean of 1.50133 MeV*) and a (L-IROR-Mean of 4.90349 MeV*); the Electropole ([e-]=0.52049 MeV*) as the effective electronmass and as determined from the electronic radius and the magnetocharge in the UFoQR.

The restmasses for the elementary particles can now be constructed, using the basic nucleonic restmass (m_c=9.9247245x10^-28 kg*=(Squareroot of [Omega]xm_P) and setting (m_c) as the basic maximum (UP/DOWN-K-mass=mass(KERNEL CORE)=3xmass(KKK)=3x319.62 MeV*=958.857 MeV*);
Subtracting the (Ring VPE 3xL(+)=19.215 MeV*, one gets the basic nucleonic K-state for the atomic nucleus (made from protons and neutrons) in: {m(n⁰;p⁺)=939.642 MeV*}.

The HB discussed in the New Scientist post below is said of having been measured in the decay of W's, Z's and Tau Leptons, as well as the bottom- and top-quark systems described in the table and the text above.

Now in the table I write about the KIR-OR transitions and such. The K means core for kernel and the IR means InnerRing and the OR mean OuterRing. The Rings are all to do with Leptons and the Kernels with Quarks.

So the Tau-decay relates to 'Rings' which are charmed and strange and bottomised and topped, say. They are higher energy manifestations of the basic nucleons of the proton and the neutrons and basic mesons and hyperons.

As I have shown, the energy resonances of the Z-boson (uncharged) represents an 'average' or statistical mean value of the 'Top-Quark' and the Upper-Limit for the Higgs Boson is a similar 'Super-Quark' 'average' and as the weak interaction unification energy.

The hitherto postulated Higgs Boson mass of so 110 GeV is the Omicron-resonance, fully predicted from the table above (unique to Quantum Relativity).
Now the most fundamental way to generate the Higgs Boson as a 'weak interaction' gauge is through the coupling of two equal mass, but oppositely charged W-bosons (of whom the Z^o is the uncharged counterpart).

We have seen, that the W-mass is a summation of all the other quark-masses as kernel-means from the strangeness upwards to the truth-quark level.
So simply doubling the 80.47 GeV mass of the weak-interaction gauge boson must represent the basic form of the Higgs Boson and that is 160.9 GeV.

Simplicity indeed and just the way Quantum Relativity describes the creation of the Higgs Boson from even more fundamental templates of the so called 'gauges'. The Higgs Boson is massless but consists of two classical electron rings and a massless doubled neutrino kernel, and then emerges in the magnetocharge induction AS mass carrying gauges.

This massless neutrino kernel now crystallises our atomic solar system.

Next we interpret this scalar (or sterile) Double-Higgs (anti)neutrino as a majoron and lose the distinction between antineutrino and neutrino eigenstates.

We can only do this in the case of the Z^o decay pattern, which engage the boson spin of the Z^o as a superposition of two antineutrinos for the matter case and the superposition of two neutrinos in the antimatter case from first principles.

So the Z^o IS a Majorana particle, which merges the templates of two antineutrinos say and SPININDUCES the Higgs-Antineutrino.
And where does this occur? It occurs at the Mesonic-Inner-Ring Boundary previously determined at the 2.776x10^-18 meter marker.
This marker so specifies the Z^o Boson energy level explicitely as an upper boundary relative to the displacement scale set for the kernel at the wormhole radius r_w=l_w/2π and the classical electron radius as the limit for the nuclear interaction scale at 3 fermis in: R_comptonxAlpha.

So the particle masses of the standard model in QED and QCD become Compton-Masses, which are HIGGS-MASSINDUCED at the Mesonic-Inner-Ring (MIR) marker at R_MIR=2.776x10^-18 meters.

The Compton masses are directly obtained from E=hf=mc²=hc/λ and say as characteristic particle energies.
At the Leptonic-Outer-Ring or LOR; λ_LOR=2πR_e and at the MIR λ_MIR=2πR_MIR for characteristic energies of 71.38 GeV and 71.33 MeV respectively.

So we know that the Higgs-Mass-Induction occurs at those energy levels from the elementary template and as experimentally verified in terms of the neutrino masses by Super-Kamiokande in 1998.
The LOR-energy of course indicates the Muon mass as a 'heavy electron' and the MIR-energy indicates the associated 'heavy quark' mass.

This has been described before in the general mass induction scales for the diquarks as consequence from the bosonic bifurcation of string masses (XL-Boson string splits into quark- and lepton fermions as fundamental supersymmetry and the magnification of the Planck-scale).
We also know, that the elementary proto-nucleon seed m_c has grown in a factor of Yⁿ~(1.618034)ⁿ~1.72 for a present n=1.1324..to create the present nucleonmasses in a perturbation of its finestructure.
Subsequently, the MIR-energy of 71.38 GeV represents a Z^o-Boson seed, which has similarly increased between a factor of √(Yⁿ)~1.313 and Yⁿ~1.724.

These values so give present boundary conditions for the Higgs Boson in terms of its Z^o coupling as the interval {93.73-123.09} GeV* or {93.50-122.79} GeV. The latter interval reduces by 1.58% to {92.02-120.85} GeV, as we have used the 'effective electron mass' m_e, differing in that percentage from the bare electron's restmass in our calculations.
The lower bounded HB so manifests in the form of the Z^o and as the majorana Higgs-Induction and coupled to the Spin-Induction of the Scalar Higgs Antineutrino.
As described previously; the Z^o-Boson mass is the mean of the top-quark K-Mean as 91.380 GeV* = 91.155 GeV and so relates the quark energy levels to the Higgs inductions for both spin and inertia. This occurs at the down-strange ds-diquark level of the cosmogenesis.

The W-Boson masses are the summation of the quark K-Means and represents the summation of all lower diquark energy levels from doubleup to doubledown.
As the down-strange or MIR-LOR energy level is coupled as a Kernel-MIR level in the bottom-antibottom mesonic diquark system, the energy difference between the Z^o- and the W-bosons should amount to that b-quark energy of about 10 GeV and which indeed is experimentally verified as such.
Finally the doublestrange diquark level then becomes the well known Fermi-Energy of the Superquark K-Mean at 298.453 GeV*=297.717 GeV and which reduces to 293.013 GeV in the 1.58% in the SI mensuration system for an Fermi energy of 1.165x10^-5 1/GeV².

Quantum Relativity then stipulates, that the Higgs-Mass-Induction energies will assume particular energy value related to the diquark mass induction table of the K-Means, coupled to the weakon masses as indicated.
The overarching energy level is however that at 92 GeV as the lower bound and as represented in the definition of the Z^o-Boson as a Majorana Spininduced scalar Higgs boson. The upper bound is the Fermi energy of the Super-Diquark as a doublestrange.
This 92 GeV level represents a seedling energy of 71.38 GeV from the primordial universe and when the XL-Boson aka the heterotic string class HO(32) decayed into a fermionic quark-lepton bifurcation and which today is represented in the diquark eigenstates of the standard model in particle physics through its Unitary Symmetries.

Tony B. - December 28th, 2014 -Queanbeyan, NSW, Australia

http://www.cosmosdawn.net/forum/
http://www.cosmosdawn.net/forum/ind...tring-and-supermembrane-epsess.886/#post-4827​