The United Synold-east "christian"(marian)orthodoxy & Roman Catholicism~1054 A.d~jesuit Order

The United Synold-East "Christian"(Marian)Orthodoxy & Roman Catholicism
~til 1054 a.d~Jesuit Order

East "Christian" (Marian) Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism were officially one system til 1054 a.d. I've seen it called the United Synod.

The Jesuit order (an order of Catholicism) is an extremely dangerous problem.

That's what i really want to say here. And how inconceivably manipulative they are, and how they manage to be so psychologically sinister, is the topic of the linked video.

But, don't let this post confuse you: I still think the final form of Revelation 17's Mother of Harlots shall be a Gnostic version of Eastern Orthodoxy.

I.e. particularly some return of Sophia-idolatry.

Still, the Mother of Harlots is also supposed to be drunk
with the blood of the saints.

So, the Catholic (universal as Babel) authority structure can't be completely eliminated as a contender either.

So, perhaps a Gnostic version of a re-United Synod
is the real Ill-Looming Naughty in this case.

( iLL-Looming Naughty - The iLLs aka The illuminati )

And now let's learn how these manipulators manage to do what they do:


video

View: https://youtu.be/e7rXJ59D26A

Jesuits, Part 1: Jesuits Are Not What They Seem


In the pic below from Mark, we have Jesus himself acting as a Bible thumper.

That is, he was holding the religious authorities accountable
to Constitutional-type documents.

Those are the 39 Books named after the Old Testament.

People think Jesus argued against the Old Testament.

Close, but very wrong. Rather Jesus argued
against how the religious establishment taught it
and how it disregarded the O.T. while pretending to teach it.

Those teachers did both.

So, in keeping with this example, i'm still waiting to see how Sunday
is the new weekly Sabbath (meaning, holy day of rest).

(My conclusions from this conclusion led me to a surprising revelation
about the identity of the Mother of Harlots in Revelation 17 & 18.
But it's still a journey to get there.

This post is on the Lord's Day, not the other though related topic.
But i'll link in the comments.)

So anyway, if i'm untainted by human tradition,
& if i am well versed in the Bible, then what shall i think "the Lord's day"
mentioned in Revelation 1 is?

"The Lord's day" in these exact words is no where else in Scripture.

But the Day of the Lord is!

It appears God moved apostle John to say this to --

1. give a brief summary of what he was about to talk about:
most of the Book is about the Day of the Lord.

2. he was referring to the present, & it was the Day of the Lord for Judaea
but Not for the whole world yet.

And later in the Book he visits the future.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yBx82Ppfq7am/


The Jesuit order of the Vatican (using their secret societies, like the Freemasons, Illuminati, )

video

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yBx82Ppfq7am/