Dna Evidence Rocks The Boat ~ X And, Rh Negative O - In Indigenous People & Tribes

yes, i too think 'dna' is in 'the blood' - susan lynne schwenger

 

Fognoggin says:





Some of the statements in the video in the opening post are logically and factually incorrect. We may all have common genetic origins but that doesn't mean that all of our body parts should be compatible and neither will we all be able to inherit all of our ancestors traits.

Think of Adam and Eve as two painting pallets. Each of their offspring inherited some colours from each pallet. Add the odd mutation so that the offspring pallets had a new colour now and again.
A few generations later some of the offspring on different branches of heredity may never be able to have all of the colours on Adam or Eve's pallets as the line of inheritence extends.
Apply the colour principle to blood, or any organ development. Each line of inheritance opens up new possibilities.
But in some ways it is like walking across along a path that crumbles behind you. Each of us (or couple of us) makes a new path, and maybe for a long time everybody's path is made of similar kind of stone, but that doesn't mean that, who knows how many generations later, that those paths have the same composition.

I would use eye colour to demonstrate this. Certain eye colour genes are dominant. That means that each parent of a couple with different eye colours have a chance of passing on part of their own eye colour combination genes. The child will not be inherit all the eye colour genes from both parents. That does not mean that the child has more or less human eyes or that any one eye colour is alien. As populations travel the branches of these hereditary lines can re-connect and re-diversify the possibilites - the diversification is enchanced by the mutations that have occurred along the way within each branch.
Hereditary lines with less travel may well have lines of development that die out. Purely red hair as an example is becoming more rare outside of places like Ireland as other colour genes are more dominant, so that gene becomes more and more watered down as you get further afield.

Ok this is an oversimplification of the way genes work, as some traits are passed on with hardly any variation through the generations (most of us still prefer to breathe air) - but I hope it demonstrates how the video is incorrect in its initial assertions that are the foundations of its theory.

Another flaw in the basis of the theory that is commonly made:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rh+factor
It is not called Rh because we inherited it from Rhesus monkeys - it is called Rh because it was first recognised in Rhesus monkey blood. If it had been given the name "F" people would not make the same mistake and jump to the wrong conclusions. Bear in mind that whether we did evolve from apes or not, in whole or in part, some of those mutations will become incompatible because as inheritance lines progress and diverge those differences will be more significant.

There are so many of these sweeping statements in there.

"no one has tried to explain where the rh negative people came from."
(expletive deleted) Actually lots of people have. One of the first hits on google came up with this, so I doubt very much that this is hard to find.

http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask381

Environmental factors in different places can determine whether some genetic developments (mutations) are successful. For example a local problem, such as a disease or type of predator, may mean that a person with a mutation that helps fight this is more likely to survive and propogate and pass this gene on. But, that very same mutation may be a liability in other ways or when transported to other environments.
The rh blood type could very well be an example of this, a mutation that was useful in combatting a problem in the local environment with a side effect of a risk of incompatiblity in other ways - but because the benefits to survival of having that gene outweighed the damage it caused, that mutation "survived" ie the people carrying it survived more often than those without it in the face of the hazard in the environment. Think about the phrase "survival of the fittest" it applies to survival of genetic traits and mutations.


"... these people must be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor"
We are all descendants of mutations - that is the nature of every evolving species on our planet. We as humans may all have originated from a narrow mutation - say human from apes, but along the way to where we are now our branches have grown and extended, some intermingling again and some dying in isolation or due to useless or counterproductive mutation. This is not proof of any alien involvement.
Siblings are discouraged from pro-creating for very good medical reasons. This does not mean that one of them is an alien.

The whole film continues in the misinformed way with its assertions. I don't like reacting so negatively when people are aiming to share what they find interesting or informative but I found it very frustrating to watch.

btw I am an rh neg variant.





Originally Posted by alienHunter

Why does DNA contain the ability to 'make' literally anything.
Having just about reached the limit of my knowledge (hi google) on genetic functions I could only try to answer using logic - if any base creature on any planet did not have the potential for mutation (whether random or selective, through a dna function or whatever) then, as long as the environment has any potential for change at all, the creature would not adapt and would be at risk from those changes.
This doesn't imply a conscious effort at mutation - it could just indicate that any creature without the capacity to mutate is eventually doomed. It could be that there were (are) lots of creatures that cant mutate and therefore are or have been doomed, leaving only the mutant capable creatures to continue the survival of the fittest.

If everything living here now developed from single cell creature mutations - randomly mutating with more or less successful interaction with its environment, which in turn affected survival and propogation rates it leads me to two more questions that aren't obviously related to whether any non-earth intervention was evident in what we, or some of us, are now-

1. Surely there was not one point at which a mutation created a soul, therefore if anybody or any thing has a soul, everything else living has - plants, humans, animals - including bacteria etc. That's not a comfortable though for many religions.
I was raised to believe that only humans and not animals could go to heaven, as only humans had souls. If it's argued that certain levels of intellect are necessary for the formation of soul, while accepting that we are random mutations, this would mean that a random intellectual capactity mutation also created a soul. I'm not convinced by that. For me, either we are clever enough now to invent the concept of the soul and it remains just a concept, or every living thing has one.
I've got to admit that I'm pretty ignorant about spiritual concepts but it is interesting how they can be interpreted. For example the idea that every life is precious, or at least not to be disregarded, right through to the "do as you would be done by" standpoint, could all be seen to be a mutation that works by not harming the environment that sustains you, or the safety in numbers reaction. Or, creatures smarter than us introduced the concept. If so I hope they were being honest

2. If humans are merely a successful line of mutation, then we are a random product (a successful product of mutation interacting with environment maybe, but still random) and if that kind of mutation process is necessary on any life sustaining object - planet - then the odds of a similar kind of mutation are unfeasable statistically, even if similar environmental conditions existed elsewhere.
Is there any point in considering there are humanoids anywhere else? If we did one day meet even vaguely humanoid aliens, that in itself would be proof to me (if statistics can be seen as proof) that our genetic development has been tampered with. It's just as likely that on the nearest earth twin, our neighbour is a tree that learned to mate with itself and eat its children, took over the whole planet and is the sole occupant and doesn't give a monkies about visiting us or answering our pestering messages.

edit to add:
having re-read, I've realised I've only partially answered the quote.
the scope of the mutation - litterally anything - is because it's not conscious and could be why we (earth creatures) survive - the more mutations, the better chance some of them will survive and propogate. if you reverse engineer the process - any creature without the consciousless random mutation capability, would eventually "choose" the wrong mutation, or not think of a successful mutation and would again die out.

Last edited by fognoggin; 29th June 2012 at 21:21.

​

 

Posted Nov 21st 2012
Alienhunter says:


could be...if the first living creature didn't have that capacity,
it wouldn't have gone much farther...

One wouldn't expect the capability to build a Rolls with the parts of a bicycle, though.

 

KristenAnn says: I was just taking my natural vitamins, and don't think I mentioned this on this thread.

So I will, in case any of you other negatives would be interested. Interestingly,

a friend who researched blood types told me that negative blood

(and now I don't remember if she was referring specifically to O negative or any negatives)

is more copper than iron based. ! An intriguing find!

She said that she takes Copper Sebacate by Source Naturals. I've ordered it & am now taking it.


This was interesting because my whole family is O-.

And we've never been able to take iron supplements. Iron just doesn't really agree with us.

Just a tip for any of you negative blood types who might like to try copper supplements.

 

Originally Posted by KristenAnn
I was just taking my natural vitamins, and don't think I mentioned this on this thread. So I will, in case any of you other negatives would be interested. Interestingly, a friend who researched blood types told me that negative blood (and now I don't remember if she was referring specifically to O negative or any negatives) is more copper than iron based. ! An intriguing find! She said that she takes Copper Sebacate by Source Naturals. I've ordered it & am now taking it.

This was interesting because my whole family is O-. And we've never been able to take iron supplements. Iron just doesn't really agree with us. Just a tip for any of you negative blood types who might like to try copper supplements.
I'd recommend you be careful about mineral levels and boosting or reducing them outside of normal intake ranges without being tested and discussing the results with a doctor.

Copper and iron are essential for the production of blood. Iron is needed in the right quantity range for haemoglobin which transports oxygen around the body, which is why people who are low on haemoglobin can get breathless or dizzy - a common effect of anemia.

I'm O neg.

I very recently found out I have a recessive gene comination (needs BOTH parents to be carriers of at least one of the double gene combination) which means I absorb too much iron. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_overload
The only way to get rid of iron is bleeding (it should only be one pint a few times per year for me once the levels are normalised), which is important because excess iron is stored in any and all organs - primarily the liver, so the effects vary individually and can build up to toxic levels eventually - although women with this conditon (haemachromatosis) are less affected due to menstruation.

But there are other mineral versions of this genetic condition - including copper. Unfortunately some of the symptoms of genetic iron overload, "The Celtic Disease", are very similar to iron deficiency, with many doctors misdiagnosing then recommending iron supplements which make the problem worse. Self diagnosis is not enough - confirming tests are needed.
People with this condition are advised to avoid frequent consumption of red meat (most other food sources only contain a fraction of iron in comparison) and alcohol, because booze increases your iron absorbtion if you have some iron in your diet.

An inbalance in minerals can also affect other nutrition, for example too much iron can inhibit calcium absorbtion. It also has a relationship with vitamin C.
So you may agree it's always worth talking to an expert about balancing your nutrition - taking into account any "abnormalities" - before loading or limiting nutrition. For example I have to have lots of dairy and avoid blood products. I was extremely lucky - if I hadn't given up meat in my 20s I could be dead by now.

If you have unusual levels of any mineral your doctor can test for them, and if they are out of normal range despite your not having a diet that could cause this then more tests can be made, eventually with a gene test if it's narrowed down to this cause. If, like me, you're found to have a genetic conditon, your family then need to be screened.
The gene test is too expensive to do unless you have the cheaper mineral/vitamin test results done first.

The iron overload condition affects about 1 in 200 people in Europe (rarer outside Europe) but still most doctors havent heard of it even though that doesn't seem too rare to me.



frognoddiin

 

Alienhunter says: I'm one of those lowly A- but i have always instinctively tried to minimize my red meat intake

(i didn't know my blood type until relatively recently). Have always enjoyed 'dairy' too much...

I haven't had any real problems with blood other than some anomalous characteristics of my phosphorus levels...

no health problems associated, it's just weirdly out of range.

(Any ideas about that...beyond the typical health ramifications).

Oh, last physical, my testosterone levels were unusually high according to my doctor

(no associated health problems beyond being hairy and beating my chest a lot).

 

KristenAnn says:

Wow Fognoggin -- impressive knowledge you have there on the issue! Interesting that alcohol promotes/increases iron absorbtion! Yes, I guess I better have a thorough testing at some point. Luckily I have friends who own a compounding pharmacy and are very much into natural things,

especially where drugs are concerned

. Even tho my Dad was a doctor, I'm very leery of traditional medical professionals & their diagnoses.

(Actually Dad became very open to our natural ideas.)


Anyway! Thanks for all the info! Sorry about your condition, but it looks like your body has good instincts for what it needs & doesn't need.

Sorry Alienhunter, I don't know anything about phosphorus etc.

Often what your body craves is what it needs tho -- like in the case of dairy. It just could be a necessity for you -- possibly.

Kristen

 

do any of you know what 'the monarchs' are - they are people with rh neg o blood & a mixture of native american and/or other races ?

 

some info on - rh negative o blood

Jesus (Yashua’s) Nazarene

Found on: http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/...le_11992.shtml
Written by: Neil (Unknown)

We wonder today if there is a bloodline group alive today that has the same bloodline that Jesus (Yashua) was born with and I SAY YES. This bloodline is not large in number but they represent about 10% of the global populations and can be found primarily in the United State but on all continents as well.

These descendents have a rare blood factor and have prehistoric ancestors that can be tracked back to an area in the world known as the “Garden.” This original people group on earth were what we refer to today as Scandinavians. Believe it or not, the oldest mummies all over the world had blonde hair, which also tells us that our original ancestors were Scandinavians. I mean all of us. It does not matter what color your skin is today, your original ancestors on earth were Scandinavian. When Jesus (Yashua) said we were all brothers he meant it literally.

THE BLONDE BLUE-EYED SCANDINAVIAN NAZARENE TRIBES THAT JESUS (YASHUA) WAS BORN INTO, ARE NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE RED HAIR GREEN-EYED BLOODLINE KNOWN AS THE “TRIBE OF CAIN” that is also known as the “Tribe of DAN”, WHICH IS A HYBRID BLOODLINE,

Science can track this Scandinavian Bloodline from the exact location Jesus (Yashua’s) Nazarene tribes lived in Northern Israel back in time thousands of years before Jesus (Yashua) was born. Jesus (Yashua) was not a Jew as people have falsely labeled him, he was a Nazarene and was probably born in the same Nazarene village where ran his ministry from in Northern Israel. The Bible clearly states that Jesus (Yashua) was a Nazarene.

The Nazarenes were Scandinavians who apparently had the PURE Rh Negative bloodline factor, which can be tracked back in time to the original human race that was born on this planet in a part of the world that was known as the “Garden”.



After the original human race incarnated in human flesh on earth, Cain’s bloodline was created. Cain’s hybrid bloodline has a long history of in breeding. Below are some examples of this in breeding. Cain is actually a Biblical example of a human hybrid, so let’s start with Cain’s origins.



http://www.britam.org/ HebrewTypes.html#Hebrew


•According to what Jesus (Yashua) taught in the “Sophia Pistis Story” which can be found in the Nag Hammadi Scrolls, Yahweh Ildabaoth the Demiurge was the evil god of the Jews. It was Yahweh Ildabaoth the Demiurge who was the biological father of Cain. Jesus (Yashua) describes this evil fallen entity as a lion-faced reptilian. As the story goes Yahweh Ildabaoth the Demiurge raped Eve who gave birth to Cain. Some say that Eve was not Cains actual mother and that originally Adam had a different wife. The stories are very convoluted, however the point is that Cain was a hybrid from the start.


•After the last BIG FREEZE and after the flood, which inundated the island of Atlantis that also generated the global Noah and the Ark stories, the survivors landed in the America’s, Africa, parts of the Middle East, the Canary Islands, the Azores etc. This people group was known to science as the “Adams.” The “Adams” bred into the Middle East and seeded the Canaanites. They were also called the Phoenicians and the “Sea People.” It was the “Sea People” who also transported the Tribe of Cain –Dan” into Spain, France and the British Isles from the Mediterranean Sea

•Another in breeding took place between the Scandinavian Nazarene tribes that Jesus (Yashua) would later be born into that are described in Egyptian records as having BLONDE HAIR BLUE-EYES. They were a tribe that lived in Northern Israel at the base of Mt. Carmel between the Mediterranean Sea and the Sea of Galilee. They were referred to as the SHOSHU in Egyptian Hieroglyphics This in breeding took place so far back we have trouble tracking them. Cain’s tribe was a wandering tribe of nomads with out a home, who were known in Egyptian hieroglyphics as the APIRU. The descendents of this in breeding became the Hebrew people of Northern Israel.




The “Sea People” aka the Adams were the first people group who migrated out of Hyperborea after they were forced to leave for mingling with the gods.



Hyperborean legends tell us that two waves of human beings left Hyperborea. The first wave moved into North America, Atlantis and eventually the America’s and the rest of the world, while the second wave moved into the Northern Scandinavian countries.

In my research regarding the direct bloodline of Jesus Yashua, I have found little information. Unfortunately the "Powers At Be" have all but destroyed these bloodline links to Jesus Yashua and his Nazarene bloodline. However we can pick up the pieces today by tracking the Scandinavian Nazarene tribes on earth through national origins and their PURE Rh Negative blood factors.



BUYER BEWARE OF THE DAVINCI CODE BLOODLINES



The HOLY GRAIL writers appear to have associated the RED HAIR GREEN-EYED "Serpent Bloodline of the Cain with the Merovingian Kings that were a hybrid line of kings. The Merovingian bloodline is not the PURE Rh Negative BLONDE BLUE-EYED Scandinavian descendents of Jesus Yashua and his Nazarene tribes. One of the ways the Holy Grail authors make this association is by claiming Jesus (Yashua) is a Jew and then tracking a Jewish bloodline to the Merovingian kings, another way they do this is by not telling you that the Merovingian bloodline was the hybrid bloodline of Cain.



THE BLOODLINE OF JESUS (YASHUA) AND THE NAZARENES APPEAR TO BE THE PURE RH NEGATIVES.



We know from the teachings of Jesus (Yashua) and in the Nag Hammadi Documents as well as from prehistoric records, legends, myths, archeology etc., that a SPECIAL BREED OF HUMAN BEINGS were created initially. They were and still are being created and they appear to have the PURE Rh Negative blood factor.



The Hyperborea, legends tell us that the original breed of human beings were perfect in almost every way. Jesus (Yashua) teaches us that the original human race were incarnated heavenly beings who decided incarnate, in earth’s dimension, for several reasons.

One of the reasons these souls incarnated originally was to populate the world and allow our souls or spirits to experience life in our three dimensional world. Unfortunately part of this original bloodline became victims of the evil entities known as the “gods of Eden.”



This original group of human beings had some pretty amazing talents, which appears to have include talents we can’t begin to imagine today. Jesus (Yashua) stated that: “WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO MOVE MOUNTAINS.” That we, at some point, we will be able to use skills and abilities even greater than he showed his followers on earth. That we were originally born with these abilities and talents, until the evil jealous “gods” came into our three dimensional world to tamper with human DNA in an attempt to destroy our souls.



Lets now move to the blood factor theories. Theory has it that the PURE Rh Negative blood factor is the blood factor of the Nazarenes and Jesus (Yashua). The Rh Negative factor runs through the veins of approximately 10% of the global population today. The Rh Negative factor means that a person having this blood factor has pure blood. These people do not have hybrid “Monkey Blood”, as do the Rh Positive bloodlines on earth. Rh Positive means that people with this blood factor are positive for Rhesus Monkey protein, that they are essentially hybrid humans whose ancestors have been inbred with Monkey DNA. THE EVIL GODS DID IT, THIS IS NOT YOUR FAULT.



Woman with the PURE Rh Negative blood factor have trouble giving birth to babies, who have the Rhesus Monkey blood factor, these bloods to not mix. A PURE Rh Negative mother cannot carry a hybrid fetus. Rh Negative blood has been mislabeled, on line, as diseased blood. Science does not know where it came from. However ancient legends tell us that original man had Rh Negative blood, which science is unable to track because it originated in the polar region, which is now under ice and snow. This group appears to have originated in Hyperborea and then migrated into the rest of the world in pockets.



With out telling you more about the Rh Negative blood factor itself, what we do need to discuss is that this appears to be the blood factor being promoted by the HOLY BLOODLINE authors as being Jesus (Yashua’s) blood factor. Jesus (Yashua) was a Nazarene, which would also seem to indicate that the Nazarenes had the Rh Negative blood factor as well. If this is the case then many people today have this blood factor running through their veins today. It is this group who originally had the “Divine Right To Rule The World,” until it was stolen from them by these evil entities and their hybrid bloodlines.



If you have this factor in your blood you are special. The down side is that you are also a target for victimization. In the last Bilderberg meeting they decided to chip implant all blue-eyed blond people with Rh Negative blood. Chemtrails are designed to target those with the PURE RH Negative blood factor. Alien groups appear to abduct Rh Negative woman and us them as incubators in which to plant human alien fetus’s. These HYBRID BABIES are born with reptilian copper based blood that has been combined with the Rh Negative factor. Blonde blue-eyed babies are used in human sacrifices etc. THE LIST OF VICTIMIZATIONS GOES ON. These Rh Negative Reptilian Hybrids are then abducted over and over again and used for any number of reasons, most of which we don’t even want to talk about, you can only imagine why.



Today 5% of the Rh Negative population on earth that actually total 15% have what some people call the HYBRID REPTILAN ACQUATIC COPPER BASED BLOOD FACTOR. THIS VERY SMALL IN NUMBER YET GLOBALLY POWERFUL GROUP RULE OUR WORLD TODAY FROM BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. THEY ARE THE GROUP REFERRED TO AS THE ILLUMINATI, THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT, THE BILDERBERGS, THE ELITE, THE LEADERS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER, THE RICH AND POWERFUL AND THE LIST OF NAMES GO ON.



Those promoting the hybrid bloodline of “Cain” aka the “Lost Tribe of Dan,” claim to be tracking Jesus Yashua’s family after his crucifixion into Europe, through France into Northern Europe. What they don’t tell you is that this is the direction the “Serpent Bloodline of Cain” entered Europe THAT BRED WITH SCANDINAVIAN TRIBES. DNA also shows us that they were the red hair green-eyed and dark hair dark-eyed tribes that were escorted into France, Spain and the British Isles by the “Sea People” that were the same race of people known as the “Adams” (Indians) who seeded the Canaanites.



Once they entered these areas they bred with the Scandinavians. After the last BIG FREEZE ended most of the Scandinavians migrated back to Scandinavia leaving behind hybrid descendents that were the result of the inbreeding with the “Bloodline of Cain.” This bloodline left in these areas of Western Europe was an Rh Negative bloodline with hybrid DNA and was no longer a pure line.






What I have learned from my research is that Jesus (Yashua) was a BLONDE BLUE-EYED Scandinavian. Pontius Pilot described Jesus (Yashua’s) hair as being similar to the color of a walnut shell or chestnut shell.



Below is a copy of a letters written by Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar and the President of Judea describing Jesus (Yashua) as a Scandinavian.



He was not a dark eyed dark haired Judah Jewish type that we think of today, NOR DID HE HAVE THE RED HAIR AND GREEN EYES FEATURES FOUND IN THE TRIBE OF DAN. So once again the Jewish and Roman Orthodox Church movement has lied to us about the real Jesus (Yashua).



The Orthodox Jewish and Roman Catholic Church founders have also mislead us regarding the religious beliefs and teachings of Jesus (Yashua). Did you know that the Nazarene's had their own separate religion, which was also very different from the Jewish religion we find in our Bibles?



Jesus (Yashua’s) Nazarene tribes worshiped a DIFFERENT GOD in separate temples, from the Hebrew tribes of Northern and the Judah Jewish tribes in Southern Israel. THE NAZARENES ALSO HAD THEIR OWN SEPARATE SCRIPTURES. Jesus Yashua never called his God Yahweh Jehovah; in fact he clearly referred to the gods of the Hebrews and Israelites as Satanic entities and knick named them snakes and scorpions. Jesus (Yashua) referred to our GOD as FATHER and instructed his followers to do the same.



The beliefs and customs of Jesus Yashua's Nazarene tribes were very different from what we have been taught in our Orthodox Jewish and Roman Catholic Christian Church’s. For an example, did you know that Jesus (Yashua's) Nazarene tribes believed that human and animal souls came from the same basic soul pool as we did and as such animals were precious. Nazarenes did not kill and eat animals and it was forbidden to sacrifice them like the Hebrews and Jews did to appease their evil gods.



We have to remember here that several different tribes were considered to be Jewish during the time of Jesus (Yashua’s) ministry. All of them had similar, yet at the same time, very different beliefs. Jesus (Yashua) came to minister and reform all of them.

The northern Hebrew tribes worshipped the gods known to us as the Nordic Aryan Alien “Fallen Watchers” The Southern Jews of Judah worshipped Ildabaoth the Demiurge aka Yahweh Jehovah.



The Pharisee, Sadducee, Scribal, Talmud, and Torah Jews led these tribes with hidden doctrines and mystical teachings. Once you begin to read the books in the Nag Hammadi Library that apply to the Nazarene tribal beliefs, you will see that the teachings of Jesus (Yashua) and the Nazarenes were very different from what we have been schooled to believe by our religious leaders.


WE HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND THAT JESUS (YASHUA) CAME TO REFORM THESE SATANIC GROUPS, NOT TO JOIN THEM. KEEP THIS IIN MIND as you read the Nazarene, Essene and Gnostic sites on line. Many of them incorporate SATANIC PAGAN doctrines. Some of them are endorsing the satanic bloodline versions of the HOLY GRAIL facts.
http://rhnegativeregistry.com/jesus-...ve-origin.html

 

Stories of The Lost Tribes (note the plural) of Israel...
these Lost Tribes may have actually sailed to the Americas when they left Egypt.
There is supposed to be a lot of circumstancial evidence leaning towards this:

There are stories of a tribe of Native Americans known for their blonde or reddish hair, blue eyes and taller statute.
Unlike any other Native American tribes in North America, although we are starting to see these recessive genes showing up.

10 of "The Lost Tribes"
we know, that t tere were ten that were taken away into captivity that made up Israel.
They were Dan, Ephraim, Benjamin, Gad, Reuben, Manasseh, Zebulun, Asher, Issachar, and Nephtali.
Judah and Simeon were the two tribes that made up the kingdom of Judah.
It's fascinating to study these peoples and there are lots of theories about just where they ended up.

There is a magazine called "Ancient American: Archaeology of the Americas before Columbus"
that has great stuff that sheds some like on early archaeology in The Americas.